The electronic use of the NANDA-, NOC- and NIC-classifications and implications for nursing practice;Die elektronische anwendung der NANDA-, NOC- und NIC-klassifikationen und Folgerungen für die pflegepraxis

Pflege

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 443-454

  Bernhart Just, Alexandra ^a   Hillewerth, Kathrin ^b   Holzer Pruss, Christina ^c   Paprotny, Monika ^d   Heinrich, Heidi Zimmermann ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Spital Zollikerberg   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PSYCHIATRY   (Switzerland)

^d Beratung und Entwicklung   (Switzerland)

^e Klinik Adelheid   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RECORD; MODEL; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING PROCESS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; SWITZERLAND; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MODELS, NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING RECORDS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SWITZERLAND; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 77049106860     PISSN: 10125302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1012-5302.22.6.443     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Al-Ghamdi, O.: A Clinical Aspect of the Computer-Based Patient Record: Free Text versus Coded Data. TIR The Informatics review, e-journal of the Association of Medical Directors of Information Systems and The Improve-IT Institute, 2002. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 28.04.2008 unter: http://www.informatics-review.com/thoughts/freetext.pdf.
2. Allred, S.; Smith, K.; Flowers, L.: Electronic Implementation of National Nursing Standards-NANDA, NOC and NIC as an Effective Teaching Tool. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 18, 2004, 4: 56-60.
3. Aquilino, M.; Keenan, G.: Having Our Say: Nursing's Standardized Nomenclatures. American Journal of Nursing, 100, 2000, 7: 33-38.
4. Bakken, S.; Warren, J.; Lange, L.; Button, P.: A review of major Nursing Vocabularies and the Extent to Which They Have the Characteristics required for Implementation in Computer- based Systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5, 1998, 4: 312-328.
5. Bartholomeyczik, S.: Einführung in die deutschsprachige Ausgabe. In: Gordon, M.; Bartholomeyczik, S.: Pflegediagnosen: Theoretische Grundlagen. Urban & Fischer, München, 2001
6. Barton, A.; Gilbert, L.; Erickson, V.; Baramee, J.; Sowers, D.; Robertson, K.: A Guide to Assist Nurse Practitioners With Standardized Nursing Language. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 21, 2003, 3: 128-133.
7. Baumberger, D.; Holzer-Pruss, C.; Just, A.; Kleinknecht, M.; Märki, W.; Mercado, B.: DAPEP Nebenprojekt 1: Machbarkeitsklärung NIC- LEP® Nursing 3 Überleitung. Schlussbericht zu Handen der Pflegedienstkommission der Gesundheitsdirektion des Kantons Zürich, Mai 2007. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 18.04.2008 unter: http://www.pflegedienst.usz.ch/NR/rdonlyres/74E9AEC7-9988-43B8-9D19-A7D80B74AAD0/0/DAPEPNICLEPSchlussberichtv070521.pdf.
8. Bernhart-Just, A.; Steffen-Bürgi, B.: Pflege-Assessmentkonzept USZ, Zentrum für Entwicklung und Forschung Pflege, ZEFP, Universitäts- Spital Zürich, 2007. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 05.05.2008 unter: http://www.pflegedienst.usz.ch/NR/rdonlyres/B33D2C98-F2ED-4015-873D-C5EF24CFD6F8/0/projektergebnis_assessmentkonzept.pdf.
9. Bernhart-Just, A.; Hillewerth, K.; Holzer- Pruss, C.; Kleinknecht, M.; Kuster, B.; Lassen, B.; Märki, W.; Mercado, B.; Messmer, S.; Paprotny, P.; Zimmermann Heinrich, H.: Schlussbericht zum DAPEP-Projekt, Oktober 2007. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 24.04.2008 unter: http://www.pflegedienst.usz.ch/NR/rdonlyres/A72A233DEB82-4F89-BA61-46BA364AC6DE/0/DAPEP_Projektabschlussbericht.pdf.
10. Berthou, A.; Junger, A.; Kossaibati, S.: Test des Schweizerischen Nursing Minimum Data Sets (CH-NMDS) (Test II) Schlussbericht, 2005. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 25.06.2007 unter: http://www.isesuisse.ch/nursingdata/de/index.htm.
11. Brooks, B.; Massanari, K.: Implementation of NANDA Nursing Diagnosis Online. Computers in Nursing, 16, 1998, 6: 320-326.
12. Brunt, B.: Models, Measurement, and Strategies in Developing Critical- Thinking Skills. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 36, 2005, 6: 255-262.
13. Burkhart, L.; Sommer, S.: Integrating Preventive Care and Nursing Standardized Terminologies in Nursing Education: A Case Study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23, 2007, 4: 208-213.
14. Carpenito-Moyet, L.: Nursing diagnosis: application to clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006, 11th ed. Charters, K.: Nursing Informatics, Outcomes, and Quality Improvement. AACN Clinical Issues, 14, 2003, 3: 282-294.
15. Coenen, A.; McNeil, B.; Bakken, S.; Bickford, C.; Warren, J.: Toward Comparable Nursing data: American Nurses Association Criteria for Data Sets, Classification Systems, and Nomenclatures. Computers in Nursing, 19, 2001, 6: 240-246.
16. Curran, C.: Informatics Competencies for Nurse Practitioners. AACN Clinical Issues, 14, 2003, 3: 320-330.
17. Curtin, L.; Simpson, R. L.: Nursing technology. Not for nurses only: a NIDSEC primer. Health Management Technology, 21, 2000, 11: 60, 62.
18. Doenges, M. F.; Moorhouse, M.; Geissler- Murr, A.: Pflegediagnosen und Maßnahmen. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, 2002.
19. Dowding, D.; Thompson, C.: Using judgement to improve accuracy in decision-making. Nursing Times, 100, 2004, 21: 36-39.
20. Doyle, M.: Home Study Program. Promoting standardized nursing language using an electronic medical record system. AORN Journal, 83, 2006, 6: 1336-1342.
21. Elfrink, V.; Bakken, S.; Coenen, A.; McNeil, B.; Bickford, C.: Standardized Nursing Vocabularities: A Foundation for Quality Care. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 17, 2001, 1: 18-23
22. ©-ergebnisorientiertes PflegeAssessment AcuteCare. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 11.11.2008 unter: http://www.epaonline.info/Downloads/ePA-Flyer_2006.pdf.
23. Fuller, K.: In Search of Intelligent Life in the Documentation Universe: A Hospital's Journey to Developing an Interdisciplinary Computer-based Documentation System. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 2006, January/February: 6-9.
24. Goossen, W.; Epping, P.; Feuth, T.; Dassen, T.; Hasman, A.; van den Heuvel, W.: A Comparison of Nursing Minimal Data Set. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5, 1998, 2: 152-163.
25. Hardiker, R.: Modelling Nursing Terminology Using the GRAIL Representation Language. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1998, 5, 1: 120-128.
26. Hebda, T.; Czar, P.; Mascara, C.: Handbook of Informatics for Nurses & Health Care Professionals. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2005, 3rd ed.
27. Hellige, B.; Stemmer, R.: Klinische Behandlungspfade: Ein Weg zur In tegration von standardisierter Behandlungsplanung und Patientenorientierung? Pflege, 2005, 18: 176-186.
28. Hübner, U.: Pflegedokumentation und Informationstechnologie-Chancen und Grenzen. Pflegeinformatik, 2004, 4: 231-233.
29. Hübner, U.; Giehoff, C.: ICNP und NANDA-zwei sich ergänzende Terminologien? Pflegeinformatik, 2003, 11: 64-67.
30. Hughes, R.; Lloyd, D.; Clark, J.: A Conceptual Model for Nursing Information. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 19, 2008, 2: 48-56.
31. Hughes, R.; Clark, J.; Lloyd, D.: A conceptual model for nursing information In: Oud, N.; Sheerin, F.; Ehnfors, M.; Sermeus, W. (ed.): ACENDIO 2007. 6th European Conference of Acendio, Nursing Communication in Multidisciplinary Practice. Oud Consultancy & Conference Management, Amsterdam, 2007.
32. Hughes, R.: Conference/Workshop, Naming Nursing in an Information Age, Bodelwyddan Castle, 2005a, Internetressource. Abgerufen am 01.09.2007 unter: http://www.ehealthnurses.org.uk/wales/pdf/nwntg.pdf.
33. Hughes, R.: Nurse Terminology Model, North Wales Nursing Terminology Group, 2005b. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 30.04.2007 unter: http://www.ehealthnurses.org.uk/wales/ppt/econf1e.ppt.
34. Johnson, M.; Bulechek, G.; Butcher, H.; McCloskey Dochterman, J.; Maas, M.; Moorhead, S.; Swanson, E.: NANDA, NIC, and NOC Linkages. Nursing Diagnoses, Outcomes and Interventions. Mosby & Elsevier, St. Louis, 2006.
35. Just, A.; Arnold, A.; Busch, N.; Hillewerth, K.; Holzer-Pruss, Ch.; Miserez, B.; Kleinknecht, M.; Kuster, B.; Lassen, B.; Märki, W.; Mercado, B.; Messmer, S.; Miserez, B.; Schwendimann, R.; Zimmermann Heinrich, H.: Bericht zum Teilprojekt A: Ordnungssysteme zur Abbildung des Pflegeprozesses im elektronischen Patientendossier, 2005. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 20.03.2007 unter: http://www.pflegedienst.usz.ch/german/HealthProfessionals/ZEFP/Projektberichte05/elekt_pflegedoku_kt_zh.htm.pdf.
36. Just, A.; Busch, N.; Hillewerth, K.; Holzer-Pruss, Ch.; Kleinknecht, M.; Kuster, B.; Lassen, B.; Märki, W.; Mercado, B.; Messmer, S.; Paprotny, M.; Schwendimann, R.; Zimmermann Heinrich, H.: Bericht zum Teilprojekt B: Die Abbildung des Pflegeprozesses im elektronischen Patientendossier-das Zürcher Datenmodell, 2006. Internetressource. Abgerufen am 20.03.2007 unter: http://www.pflegedienst.usz.ch/NR/rdonlyres/2F6A5D3A-D99C-4A0D-A8FE-02B5985F3E5F/0/Abschlussbericht_DAPEP_Teilprojekt_B.pdf.
37. Keenan, G.; Stocker, J.; Geo-Thomas, A.; Soparkar, N.; Barkauskas, V.; Lee, J.: The HANDS project: studying and refining the automated collection of a cross-setting clinical data set. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 3, 2002, 20: 89-100 (36 ref).
38. Keenan, G.; Falan, S.; Heath, C.; Treder, M.: Establishing Competency in the Use of North American Nursing Diagnosis, Nursing Out comes Classification, and Nur sing Interventions Classification Terminology. Journal of Nursing Management, 11, 2003b, 2: 183-196.
39. Keenan, G.; Stocker, J.; Barkauskas, V.; Treder, M.; Heath, C.: Toward collecting a Standardized Nursing Data Set Across the Continuum: Case of Adult Care Nurse Practitioner Setting. Outcome Management, 7, 2003a, 3: 113-120.
40. Kol, Y.; Jacobson, O.; Wieler, S.; Weiss, D.; Sadeh, Z.: Evaluation of the Nursing Outcome Classification (NOC)-From theory to Practice in Israel. Outcome Management, 7, 2003, 3: 121-128.
41. Kuntze, A.; Hübner, U.: Vergleich von NANDA, ICNP und HHCC Pflegediagnosen. Pflegeinformatik, 2006, 2: 98-101.
42. LaDuke, S.: Online nursing documentation: finding a middle ground. Journal of Nursing Administration, 31, 2001, 6: 283-286.
43. Laing, K.: The Benefits and Challenges of the Computerized Electronic Medical Record. Gastroenterology Nursing, 25, 2002, 2: 41-45.
44. Lee, M.; Delaney, C.; Moorhead, S.: Building a personal health record from a nursing perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 2007, 2: 308-316.
45. Lunney, M.: Helping Nurses use NANDA, NOC and NIC. Novice to expert. Nurse Educator, 2006, 1: 40-46.
46. McCloskey Dochterman, J.; Bulechek, G.: Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC). Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, 2004, 4th ed.
47. McCloskey Dochterman, J.; Jones, D.: Unifying Nursing Languages, the Harmonization of NANDA, NIC and NOC. American Nurses Association, Washington, D. C., 2003.
48. McCormick, C.; Delaney, C.; Flatley Brennan, P.; Effken, J.; Kendrick, K.; Murphy, J.; Skiba, D.; Warren, J.; Weaver, C.; Weiner, B.; Westra, B.: Guideposts to the future-An Agenda for Nursing Informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14, 2007, 1: 19-24.
49. McNeil, B.; Odom, S.: Nursing Informatics Education in the United States: proposed undergraduate curriculum. Health Informatics Journal, 2000, 6: 32-38.
50. Moorhead, S.; Johnson, M.; Maas, M.: Nursing Outcome Classification (NOC). Mosby & Elsevier, St. Louis, 2004, 3rd ed.
51. Moorhead, S.; Johnson, M.; Maas, M.: Pflegeergebnisklassifikation (NOC). Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, 2005.
52. Müller-Staub, M.; Lavin, M.; Needham, I.; Van Achterberg, T.: Nursing diagnosis, interventions and outcomes - application and impact on nursing practice: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56, 2006, 5: 514-531.
53. NANDA International: NANDA Pflegediagnosen. Definitionen und Klassifikation 2005-2006. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, 2005.
54. Porcella, A.: Narrative Notes in a Nursing Information System (NIS). Proceedings of the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2001: 538-542.
55. Prophet, C.; Dorr, T.; Gibbs, A.; Porcella, A.: Implementation of Standardized Nursing Languages (NIC, NOC) in On-Line Care Planning and Documentation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 1997, 46: 395-400.
56. Salanterä, S.; Eriksson, E.; Junnola, T.; Salminen, E.; Lauri, S.: Clinical Judgement and Information Seeking by Nurses and Physicians Working with Cancer Patients. Psycho- Oncology, 2002, 12: 280-290.
57. Schilder, M.: Standardisierte Pflegediagnosen, ein Instrument für die klinische Praxis? Pflegeinformatik, 2003, 4: 13-22.
58. Thompson, C.; Dowding, D.; McCaughan, D.: Strategies for avoiding pitfals in clinical decision-making. Nursing Times, 100, 2004, 20: 40-42.
59. Thoroddsen, A.; Ehnfors, M.: Putting policy into practice: pre- and posttests of implementing standardized languages for nursing documentation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 2007, 10: 1826-1838.
60. Thorrodson, A.: Applicability of the Nursing Intervention Classification to describe nursing. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19, 2005, 2: 128-139.
61. WiCARE/DOC: Internetressource. Abgerufen am 11.11.2008 unter: http://www.wigasoft.ch/produkte/wicare_doc.cfm.
62. Zytkowski, M.: Nursing Informatics: The Key to Unlocking Contemporary Nursing Practice. AACN Clinical issues, 14, 2003, 3: 271-281.