The HANDS project: Studying and refining the automated collection of a cross-setting clinical data set

CIN-Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 89-100

  Keenan, Gail M ^a,b   Stocker, Julia R ^a   Geo Thomas, Annie T ^a   Soparkar, Nandit R ^a   Barkauskas, Violet H ^a   Lee, Jan L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized; Controlled vocabulary; Medical records systems; NANDA; NIC; NOC; Nursing records

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

AUTOMATION; DATA COLLECTION; NURSING RECORDS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 0036583226     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200205000-00008     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Keenan G, Barkauskas V, Lee J, Pohl J. Evaluation of nursing-sensitive patient outcome measures. Subcontract - From University of Iowa HHS PHS National Institute of Health Funded Proposal. Bethesda, MD: HHS PHS National Institute of Health; 1998-2001. #1RO1NR03437-01.
2. Johnson M. Evaluation of Nursing Sensitive Patient Outcome Measures. Bethesda, MD: HHS PHS National Institute of Health; 1997-2001. #1RO1NR03437-01.
3. Ozbolt J. Resolving ambiguities at the intersections of conceptual structures. Paper presented at: Nursing Terminology Summit; July 7-10, 2001. Nashville, TN.
4. Moen A, Bakken S, Warren J. Representing nursing judgments in the electronic health record. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30(4):990-997.
5. Bakken S, Campbell KE, Cimmo JJ, Huff SM, Hammond WE. Toward vocabulary domain specifications for health level 7-coded data elements. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(4):333-342.
6. Bakken S, Cimino JJ, Haskell R, et al. Evaluation of clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) semantic structure as a terminology model for standardized assessment measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(6):529-538.
7. Hardiker N, Hoy D, Casey A. Standards for nursing terminology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(6):523-528.
8. Health Level 7 Inc. About HL7. Available at: http://www.hl7.org. Accessed April 2, 2001.
9. American Nurses Association. Recognized languages for nursing. Available at: http://www.nursingworld.org/nidsec/classlst.htm. Accessed September 26, 2001.
10. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification, 2001-2002. Philadelphia: NANDA; 2001.
11. Johnson M, Maas M, Morehead S. Nursing Outcomes Classification. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000.
12. McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000.
13. American Nurses Association. NIDSEC Standards and Scoring Guidelines. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1997.
14. Humphreys BL, Lindberg DA, Schoolman HM, Barnett GO. The unified medical language system: an informatics research collaboration. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(1):1-11.
15. Campbell JR, Carpenter P, Sneiderman C, Simon C, Chute C, Warren J. Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: completeness, taxonomy, mapping definitions, and clarity. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(3):238-251.
16. Campbell K, Oliver D, Shortliffe E. The unified medical language system: toward a collaborative approach for solving terminologic problems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(1):12-16.
17. Chute C, Cohn S, Campbell J. A framework for comprehensive health terminology systems in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(6):503-510.
18. Ingenerf J. Taxonomic vocabularies: the intention of usage determines different established structures. In: Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ, eds. MedInfo95. Vancouver, British Columbia: Health Care Computing and Communications, Canada, Inc.; 1995.
19. Spackman KA, Campbell K, Cote R. SNOMED RT: A reference terminology for health care. Paper presented at: 1997 AMIA Fall Symposium; Nashville, TN; 1997.
20. International Organization for Standardization. Health informatics. Controlled health vocabularies - vocabulary structure and high-level indicators. Available at: http://www.standards.nhsia. nhs.uk/isotc215/wg3/docs/. Accessed April 3, 2001.
21. International Organization for Standardization. Health informatics-Health indicators conceptual framework. Available at: http://www.standards.nhsia.nhs.uk/isotc215/wg1/docs/. Accessed March 14, 2001.
22. International Organization for Standardization. Integration of a reference terminology model for nursing. Available at: http://www.standards.nhsia.nhs.uk/isotc215/wg3/docs/. Accessed July 24, 2001.
23. Huber DG, Schumacher L, Delaney C. Nursing management minimum data set. J Nurs Admin. 1997;27:42-48.
24. Ryan P, Delaney C. Nursing minimum data set. In: Fitzpatrick JJ, Stevenson JS, eds. Annual Review of Nursing Research. Vol 13. New York: Springer; 1995:169-194.
25. Goosen W, Epping P, Feuth T, Dassen T, Hasman A, Van Den Heuvel W. A comparison of nursing minimal data set. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(2):152-163.
26. Werley H, Zorn C, eds. The nursing minimum data set: benefits and implications. In: Werely H, ed. Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set. New York: Springer; 1988.
27. Delaney CW, Mehmert P. Utility of the nursing minimum data set in validation of computerized nursing diagnoses. In: Carroll-Johnson RM, ed. Classification of Nursing Diagnosis: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1991.
28. Werley HH. Introduction to the nursing minimum data set and its development. In: Werley HH, Lang NM, eds. Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set. New York: Springer; 1988.
29. Whitten JL, Bentley LD, Dittman KC. Systems Analysis and Design Methods. 5th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2000.
30. NANDA. Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions & Classification 1999-2000. Philadelphia: NANDA; 1999.
31. Ozbolt JG. Terminology standards for nursing: collaboration at the summit. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(6):517-522.
32. Soparkar N, Korth HF, Silberschatz A. Failure-resilient transaction management in multidatabases. Computer. 1991;24(12):28-36.
33. ArsDigita. Available at: http://www.arsdigita.com. Accessed April 2, 2002.
34. World Wide Web Consortium. Available at: http://www.w3.org. Accessed October 25, 2000.
35. KDnuggets. KDnuggets: data mining, Web mining and knowledge discovery guide. Available at: http://www.kdnuggets.com. Accessed October 1, 2000.
36. Crestana-Jensen V, Soparkar N. Frequent itemset counting across multiple tables. Paper presented at: 4th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; April 18-20, 2000; Kyoto, Japan.