Building a personal health record from a nursing perspective

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 76, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2007, Pages

  Lee, Mikyoung ^a   Delaney, Connie ^b   Moorhead, Sue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Nursing informatics; Nursing outcomes classification; Personal health record; Regional health information organizations; Standardized nursing language

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; NURSING; USER INTERFACES;

CONSUMER VOCABULARY; DIARY FUNCTION; HEALTH INFORMATION; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING OUTCOMES CLASSIFICATION; PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD; STANDARDIZED NURSING LANGUAGE;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; CONSUMER; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NURSING MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF EVALUATION;

HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING CARE; NURSING INFORMATICS; SOFTWARE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 34548216363     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. J.B. Horrigan, L. Rainie, Getting serious online, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC, 2002, available at http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Getting_Serious_Online3ng.pdf.
2. Baker L., Wagner T.H., Singer S., and Bundorf M.K. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: Results from a national survey. JAMA 289 18 (2003) 2400-2406
3. S. Fox, D. Fallows, Internet health resources, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC, 2003, available at http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Health_Report_July_2003.pdf.
4. Nelson R., and Ball M.J. Consumer informatics: Applications and strategies in cyber health care series (2004), Springer Publishing, New York
5. Markle Foundation, Attitudes of Americans regarding personal health records and nationwide electronic health information exchange, 2005, available at http://www.markle.org/downloadable_assets/research_release_101105.pdf.
6. Brennan P.F., and Friede A. Public health and consumer uses of health information: Education, research, policy, prevention and quality assurance. In: Shortliffe E.H., and Perreault L.E. (Eds). Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. second ed. (2001), Springer, New York 397-420
7. C.P. Waegemann, EHR vs. CPR vs. EMR, Healthcare Informatics Online, 2003, available at http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/issues/2003/05_03/cover_ehr.htm.
8. Tang P.C., Ash J.S., Bates D.W., Overhage M., and Sands D.Z. Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13 2 (2006) 121-126
9. The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), 2005, available at http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/050909lt.htm.
10. K. Sun, Development of a model and comparison of personal health record and related health sites, 2001, available at http://www.informatics-review.com/thoughts/ksun.html.
11. Klein-Fedyshin M.S. Consumer health informatics-integrating patients, providers, and professionals online. Med. Ref. Serv. Q. 21 3 (2002) 35-50
12. Sittig D.F. Personal health records on the Internet: a snapshot of the pioneers at the end of the 20th century. Int. J. Med. Inform. 65 (2002) 1-6
13. AHIMA e-HIM Personal Health Record Work Group. Defining the personal health record: AHIMA releases definition, attributes of consumer health record. J. AHIMA 76 6 (2005) 24-25
14. Clarke J.L., and Meiris D.C. Electronic personal health records come of age. Am. J. Med. Qual. 21 3 (2006) 5S-15S
15. Denton I.C. Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience. J. Healthc. Inf. Manage. 15 3 (2001) 251-259
16. D.J. Protti, Seventh World View Report: Personal Health Records and Sharing Patient Information, July 2005, available at http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/worldview/protti7.
17. Millard R.W., and Fintak P.A. Use of the Internet by patients with chronic illness. Dis. Manage. Health Outcomes 10 3 (2002) 187-194
18. Markle Foundation, Connecting for health: Connecting Americans to their healthcare, 2004, available at http://www.connectingforhealth.org/resources/eis_exec_sum_final_0704.pdf .
19. Huston T.K., and Ehrenberger H.E. The potential of consumer health informatics. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 17 1 (2001) 41-47
20. Brennan P.F. Health informatics and community health: support for patients as collaborators in care. Method Inform. Med. 38 (1999) 274-278
21. Kaplan B., and Brennan P.F. Consumer informatics supporting patients as co-producers of quality. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8 4 (2001) 309-316
22. T.G. Thompson, D.J. Brailer, The decade of health information technology: delivering consumer-centric and information-rich health care, Framework for Strategic Action, 2004, available at http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/documents/hitframework.pdf.
23. The Library of Congress Thomas. H. R. 2234: 21st Century Health Information Act of 2005, 2005, available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:HR.2234:.
24. Koval D. Real-world RHIO: A regional health information organization blazes a trail in upstate New York. J. AHIMA 76 3 (2005) 44-48
25. B. Robinson, RHIO resistance, 2005, available at http://www.govhealthit.com/article91429-11-14-05-Print.
26. Conn J., and Destination R.H.I.O. As regional data networks continue to grow in number, some find financial strength. Mod. Healthc. 35 42 (2005) 28, 32
27. Daly J.M., Buckwalter K., and Maas M. Written and computerized care plans: organizational processes and effect on patient outcomes. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 28 9 (2002) 14-23
28. Lang N., Clark J., Coenen A., and Styles M.M. The international classification for nursing practice. In: Clark D.J. (Ed). Naming Nursing (2003), Verlag Hans Huber, Bern
29. Moorhead S., and Delaney C. Series on Nursing Administration. Information Systems Innovations: New Visions and Ventures vol. 10 (1998), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
30. Lunney M., Delaney C., Duffy M., Moorhead S., and Welton J. Advocating for standardized nursing languages in electronic health records. J. Nurs. Adm. 35 1 (2005) 1-3
31. Warren J., Delaney C., and Ryan P. Health care reform in an electronic world: information systems and the computerized patient record. In: Rantz M., and LeMone P. (Eds). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the twelfth conference, Cinahl Information Systems. Glendale, CA (1997) 385-399
32. Moorhead S., Johnson M., and Maas M. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). third ed. (2004), Mosby, St. Louis
33. Swanson E., Moorhead S., Jones M., Mass M., and Lee M. Using the model of mapping nursing outcomes classification (NOC) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to map NANDA, NIC and NOC. Int. J. Nurs. Termiol. Classif. 17 1 (2006) 56-57
34. Kim M.I., and Johnson K.B. Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9 2 (2002) 171-180
35. The Iowa Department of Public Health, Healthy Iowans 2010; Mid-course revision, 2005, available at http://www.idph.state.ia.us//bhpl/common/pdf/healthy_iowans_2010_chapter s/Healthy_Iowans_2010_Complete.pdf.
36. Werley H.H. Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set (1988), Springer Publishing, New York
37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information, security standards for the protection of electronic protected health information, general administrative requirements including, civil money penalties: Procedures for investigations, imposition of penalties, and hearings, 2003, available at http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/combinedregtext.pdf.
38. NANDA International. Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification 2005-2006 (2005), ProAccess, Inc., Philadelphia, PA
39. Iakovidis I. From electronic medical record to personal health records: present situation and trends in the European Union in the area of electronic healthcare records. Medinfo. 9 suppl. 1 (1998) 18-22
40. Ueckert F., Goerz M., Ataian M., Tessmann S., and Prokosch H. Empowerment of patients and communication with health care professionals through an electronic health record. Int. J. Med. Inform. 70 (2003) 99-108
41. Munir S., and Boaden R. Patient empowerment and the electronic health record. In: Patel V., Rogers R., and Haux R. (Eds). Medinfo 10 Pt 1 (2001) 663-665
42. Masys D., Baker D., Butors A., and Cowles K.E. Giving patients access to their medical records via the Internet: the PCASSO experience. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9 2 (2002) 181-191
43. Kinzie M.B. Instructional design strategies for health behavior change. Patient. Educ. Couns. 56 (2005) 3-15
44. Kim M.I., and Johnson K.B. Patient entry of information: Evaluation of user interfaces. J. Med. Internet Res. 6 2 (2004) e13
45. Markle Foundation, Connecting for health: a public-private collaborative, 2003, available at http://www.markle.org/downloadable_assets/dswg_report.pdf.
46. Eysenbach G., and Jadad A.R. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. J. Med. Internet Res. 3 2 (2001) e19
47. Vivian A.S., and Robertson E.J. Readability of patient education materials. Clin. Ther. 3 2 (1980) 129-136
48. Baker D.W., Parker R.M., Williams M.V., Clark W.S., and Nurss J. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am. J. Public Health. 87 6 (1997) 1027-1030
49. Graber M.A., Roller C.M., and Kaeble B. Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web. J. Fam. Pract. 48 1 (1999) 58-61
50. McCray A.T., Loane R.F., Browne A.C., and Bangalore A.K. Terminology issues in user access to Web-based medical information. Proc. AMIA Symp. (1999) 107-111
51. Lerner E.B., Jehle D.V., Janicke D.M., and Moscati R.M. Medical communications: do our patients understand?. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 18 7 (2000) 764-766
52. Zeng Q., Kogan S., Ash N., and Greenes R. Patient and clinician vocabulary: how different are they?. Medinfo. 10 Pt 1 (2001) 399-403
53. Zielstorff R.D. Controlled vocabularies for consumer health. J. Biomed. Inform. 36 (2003) 326-333
54. Eng T.R., Maxfield A., Patrick K., Deering M.J., Ratzan S.C., and Gustafson D.H. Access to health information and support: a public highway or a private road?. JAMA 280 15 (1998) 1371-1375
55. Hsieha Y., Hardardottirb G.A., and Brennan P.F. Linguistic analysis: terms and phrases used by patients in e-mail messages to nurses. Medinfo. 11 Pt 1 (2004) 511-515
56. Lavin M.A., Krieger M.M., Meyer G.A., Spasser M.A., Cvitan T., Reese C.G., and Carlson J.H. Development and evaluation of evidence-based nursing (EBN) filters and related databases. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 93 1 (2005) 105-115
57. S. Fox, Older Americans and the Internet, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC, 2004, available at http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Seniors_Online_2004.pdf.
58. Morrissey J. But what does the public think?. J. AHIMA 76 10 (2005) 42-44
59. Whiddett R., Hunter I., Engelbrecht J., and Handy J. Patients' attitudes towards sharing their information. Int. J. Med. Inform. 75 (2006) 530-541