A Fast and Safe Living Donor "Finger-Assisted" Nephrectomy Technique: Results of 359 Cases

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 165-170

  Hakim, N ^a   Aboutaleb, E ^a   Syed, A ^a   Rajagopal, P ^a   Herbert, P ^a   Canelo, R ^a   Papalois, V ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ADULT; ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CHRONIC WOUND; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAPHRAGM RUPTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INCISION; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVER INJURY; LIVING DONOR; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT SAFETY; PNEUMONIA; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RENAL ARTERY; SPLEEN INJURY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BODY MASS INDEX; FEMALE; FINGERS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LIVING DONORS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; ORGAN SIZE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RENAL ARTERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SAFETY;

EID: 76749144550     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.042     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abecassis M., Bartlett S.T., Collins A.J., et al. Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: a National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3 (2008) 471
2. Shaffer D., Sahyoun A.I., Madras P.N., et al. Two hundred consecutive living-donor nephrectomies. Arch Surg 133 (1998) 426
3. Dunn J.F., Nylander W.A., Richie R.E., et al. Living related kidney donors. A 14-year experience. Ann Surg 203 (1984) 637
4. Giessing M. Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19 suppl 4 (2004) iv36
5. Rajab A., Mahoney J.E., Henry M., et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open nephrectomies in living donors. Can J Surg 48 (2005) 123
6. Nanidis T., Antcliffe D., Kokkinos C., et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation. Ann Surg 247 (2008) 58
7. Yang S.L., Harkaway R., Badosa F., et al. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy: improvement in patient outcome. Urology 59 (2002) 673
8. Kok N.F., Alwayn I., Schouten O., et al. Mini-incision open donor nephrectomy as an alternative to classic lumbotomy: evolution of the open approach. Transpl Int 19 (2006) 500
9. Jackobs S., Becker T., Rainer L., et al. Quality of life following living donor nephrectomy comparing classical flank incision and anterior vertical mini-incision. World J Urol 23 (2005) 343
10. Schnitzbauer A., Loss M., Hornung M., et al. Mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation vs flank incision. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21 (2006) 2948
11. Kok N., Weimar W., Alwayn I., et al. The current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Europe. Transplantation 82 (2006) 892
12. Hadjianastassiou V.G., Johnson R.J., Rudge C.J., et al. 2509 Living donor nephrectomies, including the UK introduction of laparoscopic donor surgery. Am J Transplant 7 (2007) 2532
13. Hakim N. A fast and safe finger assisted nephrectomy technique. Hakim N Int Surg 92 (2008) 305
14. Shokeir A.A. Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry. J Urol 2007 178 (2007) 1860
15. Perry K.T., Freedland S., Hu J., et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 169 (2003) 2018
16. Kumar A., Tripathi D., and Srivastava A. Mini-incision live donor nephrectomy: an optimal approach for the developing countries. Clin Transplant 17 (2003) 498
17. Kok N., Lind M., Hansson B., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 333 (2006) 221
18. Kok N., Adang E., Hansson B., et al. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: a randomised study. Transplantation 83 (2007) 1582
19. Chin E.H., Hazzan D., Edye M., et al. First decade of a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program: effect of surgeon and institute experience with 512 cases from 1996 to 2006. J Am Coll Surg 209 (2009) 106
20. Kok N., Alwayn I., Lind M., et al. Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 81 (2006) 881
21. Kok N, Alwayn I, Tran K, et al: Psychosocial and physical impairment after mini-incision open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective study. Transplantation 10:1291, 82
22. Oyen O., Anderson M., Mathisen L., et al. Laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: experience from a prospective, randomised, single-centre focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 79 (2005) 1236
23. Martin G., Guise A., Bernie J., et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: effects of learning curve on surgical outcomes. Transplant Proc 39 (2007) 27
24. Lewis G., Brook N., and Waller J. A comparison of traditional open, minimal incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 17 (2004) 589
25. Srivastava A., Tripathi D., Zaman W., et al. Subcostal versus transcostal mini donor nephrectomy: is rib resection responsible for pain related donor morbidity. J Urol 170 (2003) 738