The current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Europe

Transplantation

Volumn 82, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 892-897

  Kok, Niels F M ^a   Weimar, Willem ^a   Alwayn, Ian P J ^a   Ijzermans, Jan N M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Kidney transplantation; Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; Living donors; Minimally invasive; Open donor nephrectomy; Surgical technique; Survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EUROPE; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; KIDNEY DONOR; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEPHRECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EUROPE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; NEPHRECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;

EID: 33749855492     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000235511.19629.0d     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60(9): 1047.
2. Wolf JS, Jr., Merion RM, Leichtman AB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 72(2): 284.
3. Bachmann A, Wolff T, Ruszat R, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of early complications, donor and recipient outcome with the standard open approach. Eur Urol 2005; 48(1): 90.
4. Wadstrom J. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: experience from the first 75 consecutive cases. Transplantation 2005; 80(8): 1060.
5. Redman JF. An anterior extraperitoneal incision for donor nephrectomy that spares the rectus abdominis muscle and anterior abdominal wall nerves. J Urol 2000; 164(6): 1898.
6. Greenstein MA, Harkaway R, Badosa F, et al. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy compared to the hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. World J Urol 2003; 20(6): 356.
7. Yang SL, Harkaway R, Badosa F, et al. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy: improvement in patient outcome. Urology 2002; 59(5): 673.
8. Neipp M, Jackobs S, Becker T, et al. Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision. Transplantation 2004; 78(9): 1356.
9. Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, et al. A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2004; 17(10): 589.
10. Brook NR, Nicholson ML. An audit over 2 years' practice of open and laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy at renal transplant centres in the UK and Ireland. BJU Int 2004; 93(7): 1027.
11. Pietrabissa A, Boggi U, Vistoli F, et al. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in Italy: a national profile. Transplant Proc 2004; 36(3): 460.
12. http://www.eurotransplant.nl.
13. http://www.uktransplant.org.
14. http://www.efg.sante.fr.
15. http://www.etco.org.
16. http://www.scandiatransplant.org.
17. http://www.swisstransplant.org.
18. Friedman AL, Peters TG, Jones KW, et al. Fatal and Nonfatal Hemorrhagic Complications of Living Kidney Donation. Ann Surg 2006; 243(1): 126.
19. Matas AJ, Bartlett ST, Leichtman AB, Delmonico FL. Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: survey of United States transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2003; 3(7): 830.
20. Tooher R, Boult M, Maddern GJ, Rao MM. Final report from the ASERNIP-S audit of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74(11): 961.
21. Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2003; 169(6): 2018.
22. Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997; 226(4): 483.
23. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M, et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy-a comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 1997; 63(2): 229.
24. Oyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005; 79(9): 1236.
25. Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, et al. A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2004; 78(3): 404.
26. Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2005; 95(6): 851.
27. Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng S, Palmer E, et al. Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol 2001; 166(4): 1270.
28. Lind MY, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, et al. Right-sided laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: is reluctance still justified? Transplantation 2002; 74(7): 1045.
29. Posselt AM, Mahanty H, Kang SM, et al. Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 2004; 78(11): 1665.
30. Srivastava A, Tripathi DM, Zaman W, Kumar A. Subcostal versus transcostal mini donor nephrectomy: is rib resection responsible for pain related donor morbidity. J Urol 2003; 170(3): 738.
31. Jones KW, Peters TG, Walker GW. Anterior-retroperitoneal living donor nephrectomy: technique and outcomes. Am Surg 1999; 65(3): 197.