Comparison of the quality score of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude values measured by the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer

International Ophthalmology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-5

  Pourjavan, S ^a   Boghossian, P ^a   Detry Morel, M ^a  

^a CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Intraocular pressure; Ocular pulse amplitude; Pascal dynamic contour tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OCULAR PULSE AMPLITUDE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TONOMETER; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EYE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULSE; RESEARCH DESIGN; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 76449091876     PISSN: 01655701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-008-9280-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J Flammer S Orgül 1998 Optic nerve blood-flow abnormalities in glaucoma Prog Retin Eye Res 17 267 289 10.1016/S1350-9462(97)00006-2 1:STN:280:DyaK1czmtV2jug%3D%3D 9695795 (Pubitemid 28339915)
2. J Flammer S Orgül VP Costa N Orzalesi GK Krieglstein LM Serra JP Renard E Stefánsson 2002 The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma Prog Retin Eye Res 21 359 393 10.1016/S1350-9462(02)00008-3 12150988 (Pubitemid 34879080)
3. MC Grieshaber J Flammer 2005 Blood flow in glaucoma Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16 79 83 10.1097/01.icu.0000156134.38495.0b 15744136 (Pubitemid 43790798)
4. EM Hoffmann F-H Grus N Pfeiffer 2004 Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry BMC Ophthalmol 4 1 7 10.1186/1471-2415-4-4
5. O Schwenn R Troost A Vogel F Grus S Beck N Pfeiffer 2002 Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension Br J Ophthalmol 86 981 984 10.1136/bjo.86.9.981 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vltVaqtQ%3D%3D 12185121 (Pubitemid 34953609)
6. TH Williamson A Harris 1996 Color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the eye and orbit Surv Ophthalmol 40 255 267 10.1016/S0039-6257(96)82001-7 1:STN:280:DyaK283hsVKnuw%3D%3D 8658337 (Pubitemid 26046205)
7. HE Kanngiesser C Kniestedt YC Roberts 2005 Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer J Glaucoma 14 344 350 10.1097/01.ijg.0000176936. 16015.4e 16148581 (Pubitemid 41383326)
8. A Kotecha ET White JM Shewry DF Garway-Heath 2005 The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry Br J Ophthalmol 89 1572 1575 10.1136/bjo.2005.075580 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2Mnhs1aktg%3D%3D 16299132 (Pubitemid 41729900)
9. C Kaufmann LM Bachmann MA Thiel 2004 Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry IOVS 45 3118 3121
10. S Pourjavan PY Boëlle M Detry-Morel P De Potter 2007 Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal) Int Ophthalmol 27 357 360 10.1007/s10792-007-9161-7 17955180 (Pubitemid 350090639)
11. Vulsteke C, Satlmans I, Fieuw S, Zeyen T (2008). Correlation between ocular pulse amplitude measured by dynamic contour tonometer and visual field defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:559-565
12. J Barreto Jr M Babic MR Vessani R Susanna Jr 2006 Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus Clinics 61 511 514 17187085
13. S Pourjavan C Deghislghe Van Maelderen T Zeyen 2005 Pachymetry before or after applanation tonometry. Does it matter? Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 296 51 55
14. Y Lachkar 2006 I have tested for you. The contour tonometer. IOP analysis using "Dynamic Contour Tonometry" J Fr Ophthalmol 29 32 35 10.1016/S0181-5512(06)73744-5
15. FA Medeiros PA Sample RN Weinreb 2007 Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects Ophthalmology 114 658 665 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.065 17141320 (Pubitemid 46483675)
16. M Pache S Wilmsmeyer S Lautebach J Funk 2005 Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243 763 767 10.1007/s00417-005-1124-y 15756572 (Pubitemid 41300416)
17. M Detry-Morel J Jamart MB Detry A Ledoux S Pourjavan 2007 Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer J Fr Ophtalmol 30 260 270 10.1016/S0181-5512(07)89588-X 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3hsFSmug%3D%3D 17417152
18. S Herdener M Pache S Lautebach J Funk 2007 Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT)-a comparison of agreement and reproducibility Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 24 1027 1030 10.1007/s00417-006-0449-5 (Pubitemid 46979540)
19. S Herdener D Hafizovic M Pache S Lautebach J Funk 2008 Is the PASCAL-Tonometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine? Long- and short-term reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry Eur J Ophthalmol 18 39 43 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FkvFOqsg%3D%3D 18203083
20. GT Georgopoulos M Diestelhorst R Fisher P Ruokonen GK Krieglstein 2002 The short-term effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80 54 58 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2002. 800111.x 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XislKrsL8%3D 11906305 (Pubitemid 34506344)