I have tested for you: The contour tonometer. IOP analysis using «Dynamic contour tonometry»;J'ai testé pour vous: Le tonomètre à contours. Analyse de la PIO par «Dynamic contour tonometry»

Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie

Volumn 29, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2006, Pages

  Lachkar, Y ^a  

^a SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Applanation tonometry; Dynamic contour tonometry; Intraocular pressure; Pachymetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORNEA; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS; TONOMETER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INSTRUMENTATION; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY;

CORNEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84859674274     PISSN: 01815512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol, 1997;123:767-72.
2. Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, d'Athis P. Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 1999;237:220-4.
3. Shah S, Chatterjee A, Mathai M et al. Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology, 1999;106:2154-60.
4. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol, 1993;115:592-6.
5. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 2002;120:714-20.
6. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma, 2005;14:288-92.
7. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004;30:746-51.
8. Barleon L, Hoffmann FM, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Comparison of PASCAL Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Glaucoma Patients and Healthy Subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-Abstract 4846.
9. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF. The Relative Effects of Corneal Thickness and Age on Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-Abstract 4838.
10. Pena FY, Ying-Lai M, Azen S, Varma R; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometery and Applanation Tonometery in Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46: E-Abstract 4837.
11. Schneider ED, Grehn F. Intraoular Pressure Measurement - Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:E-Abstract 4839.