Inferring the nature of allometry from geometric data

Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 311-322

  van der Linde, Kim ^a   Houle, David ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Allometry; Drosophila; Geometric morphometrics; Identifiability problem; Variance covariance matrix; Wing shape

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILIDAE;

EID: 76349100039     PISSN: 00713260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-009-9061-z     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. The Italian Journal of Zoology, 71(9), 5-16. doi: 10. 1080/11250000409356545.
2. Akca, M. D. (2003). Generalized procrustes analysis and its applications in photogrammetry. Available at: http://e-collection. ethbib. ethz. ch/ecol-pool/bericht/bericht_363. pdf.
3. Bookstein, F. L. (1986). Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Statistical Science, 1, 181-242. doi: 10. 1214/ss/1177013696.
4. Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bookstein, F. L. (1996). Biometrics, biomathematics, and the morphometric synthesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 58, 313-365. doi: 10. 1007/BF02458311.
6. Buckley, P. F., Dean, D., Bookstein, F. L., Friedman, L., Kwon, D., Lewin, J. S., et al. (1999). Three-dimensional magnetic resonance-based morphometrics and ventricular dysmorphology in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 45(1), 62-67. doi: 10. 1016/S0006-3223(98)00067-5.
7. de Celis, J. F. (2003). Pattern formation in the Drosophila wing: The development of the veins. BioEssays, 25, 443-451. doi: 10. 1002/bies. 10258.
8. Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F., & Sane, S. P. (1999). Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 284, 1954-1960. doi: 10. 1126/science. 284. 5422. 1954.
9. Dryden, I. L., & Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical shape analysis. Chichester, U. K.: John Wiley and Sons.
10. Dryden, I. L., & Walker, G. (1999). Highly resistant regression and object matching. Biometrics, 55, 820-825. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0006-341X. 1999. 00820. x.
11. Goodall, C. (1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 53(2), 285-339.
12. Goodall, C. (1995). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape revisited. In K. V. Mardia & C. A. Gill (Eds.), Current issues in statistical shape analysis (pp. 18-33). Leeds: Leeds University Press.
13. Gower, J. C. (1975). Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika, 40, 33-51. doi: 10. 1007/BF02291478.
14. Held, L. I. (2002). Imaginal discs: The genetic and cellular logic of pattern formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Houle, D., Mezey, J., Galpern, P., & Carter, A. (2003). Automated measurement of drosophila wings. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 3, 25. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2148-3-25.
16. Klingenberg, C. P. (2009). Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: Tools for evaluating a-priori hypotheses. Evolution & Development, 11, (in press).
17. Lele, S. (1993). Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): Estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Mathematical Geology, 25(5), 573-602. doi: 10. 1007/BF00890247.
18. Lele, S. R., & McCulloch, C. E. (2002). Invariance, identifiability, and morphometrics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(459), 796-806. doi: 10. 1198/016214502388618609.
19. Lele, S. R., & Richtsmeier, J. T. (2001). An invariant approach to statistical analysis of shapes. London, U. K: Chapman and Hall-CRC press.
20. Mezey, J. G., & Houle, D. (2005). The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 59(5), 1027-1038.
21. Mosimann, J. E. (1970). Size allometry: Size and shape variables with characterizations of lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(330), 930-945. doi: 10. 2307/2284599.
22. Richtsmeier, J. T., Lele, S. R., & Cole, T. I. (2005). Landmark morphometrics and the analysis of variation. In B. Hallgrímsson & B. K. Hall (Eds.), Variation: A central concept in biology (pp. 49-68). New York: Academic Press.
23. Rohlf, F. J. (2003). tpsRegr, version 1. 28-1. 30. Department of ecology and evolution, Stony brook, NY: State University of New York.
24. Rohlf, F. J., & Bookstein, F. L. (2003). Computing the uniform component of shape variation. Systematic Biology, 52(1), 66-69. doi: 10. 1080/10635150390132759.
25. Rohlf, F. J., & Marcus, L. F. (1993). A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 129-132. doi: 10. 1016/0169-5347(93)90024-J.
26. Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990). Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39(1), 40-59. doi: 10. 2307/2992207.
27. Siegel, A. F., & Benson, R. H. (1982). A robust comparison of biological shapes. Biometrics, 38(2), 341-350. doi: 10. 2307/2530448.
28. Slice, D. E. (1998). Morpheus et al.: software for morphometric research, version revision 01-30-98. Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.
29. Slice, D. (2001). Landmark coordinates aligned by procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Systematic Biology, 50, 141-149. doi: 10. 1080/10635150119110.
30. Sun Microsystems Inc (1992-2006). Java(tm) development kit, version 1. 1. 8_005. Santa Clara, CA: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
31. Theobald, D. L., & Wuttke, D. S. (2006). Empirical Bayes hierarchical models for regularizing maximum likelihood estimation in the matrix Gaussian procrustes problem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(49), 18521-18527. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0508445103.
32. van der Linde, K. & Houle D. (2004-2008). Wings. Tallahassee: Florida State University. Available at: http://www. kimvdlinde. com/morphometrics.
33. van der Linde, K. (2005-2008). Geometrics package. Tallahassee: Florida State University. Available at: http://www. kimvdlinde. com/morphometrics.
34. Verboon, P., & Gabriel, K. R. (1995). Generalized procrustes analysis with iterative weighting to achieve resistance. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 57-73.
35. Walker, J. A. (2000). Ability of geometric morphometric methods to estimate a known covariance matrix. Systematic Biology, 49(4), 686-696. doi: 10. 1080/106351500750049770.
36. Zelditch, M. L., Straney, D. O., Swiderski, D. L., & Carmichael, A. C. (1990). Variation in developmental constraints in Sigmodon. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 44, 1738-1748. doi: 10. 2307/2409503.
37. Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, H. D., & Fink, W. L. (2004). Geometric morphometrics for biologists: A primer. Amsterdam: Elsevier.