Effect of a new liner/base on human dentin permeability

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 245-252

  Rusin, Richard P ^a   Agee, Kelli ^b   Suchko, Michael ^b   Pashley, David H ^b  

^a 3M COMPANY   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dentin permeability; Glass ionomer; Hybrid layer; Liner; Resin tag; SEM; Sensitivity; Smear layer

Indexed keywords

DESENSITIZING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; VITREBOND PLUS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH PERMEABILITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN DESENSITIZING AGENTS; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTINAL FLUID; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SMEAR LAYER;

EID: 76349093836     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Auschill T.M., Koch C.A., Wolkewitz M., Hellwig E., and Arweiler N.B. Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Operative Dentistry 34 1 (2009) 3-10
2. Briso A.L., Mestrener S.R., Delício G., Sundfeld R.H., Bedran-Russo A.K., de Alexandre R.S., et al. Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations. Operative Dentistry 32 (2007) 421-426
3. Christensen G.J. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association 133 (2002) 229-231
4. Christensen G.J. Overcoming the challenges of Class II resin-based composites. Journal of the American Dental Association 137 7 (2006) 1021-1023
5. Brännström M., and Astrom A. The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. International Dentistry Journal 22 (1972) 219-227
6. Brännström M. Sensitivity of dentine. Oral Surgery 21 (1966) 517-526
7. Pashley D.H. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. Journal of Endodontics 12 (1986) 465-474
8. Gordan V.V., Mjor I.A., Hucke R.D., and Smith G.E. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations. Quintessence International 30 (1999) 55-59
9. Gordan V.V., Mjor I.A., and Moorhead J.E. Amalgam restorations: postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth. Operative Dentistry 24 (1999) 377-383
10. Akpata E.S., and Sadiq W. Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites. American Journal of Dentistry 14 (2001) 34-38
11. Duke E.S., Robbins J.W., and Trevino D. The clinical performance of a new adhesive resin system in class V and IV restorations. Compendium 15 (1994) 852, 854, 856
12. Browning W.D. The benefits of glass ionomer self-adhesive materials in restorative dentistry. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (2006) 308-314
13. Hansen E.K. Dentin hypersensitivity treated with a fluoride-containing varnish or a light-cured glass-ionomer liner. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 100 (1992) 305-309
14. Tantbirojn D., Poolthong S., Leevailoj C., Srisawasdi S., Hodges J.S., and Randall R.C. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer liner for cervical dentin hypersensitivity treatment. American Journal of Dentistry 19 (2006) 56-60
15. Polderman R.N., and Frencken J.E. Comparison between effectiveness of a low-viscosity glass ionomer and a resin-based glutaraldehyde containing primer in treating dentine hypersensitivity-a 25.2-month evaluation. Journal of Dentistry 35 (2007) 144-149
16. Ferrari M. Uses of glass-ionomers as bondings, linings, or bases. In: Davidson C.L., and Mjor I.A. (Eds). Advances in glass-ionomer cements (1999), Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., Carol Stream, IL, USA 137-148
17. Yoshida Y., Van Meerbeek B., Nakayama Y., Snauwaert J., Hellemans L., Lambrechts P., et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. Journal of Dental Research 79 2 (2000) 709-714
18. Rusin R.P., Rolf J.C., Crawford E.A., Cummings K.M., Bui H.T., and Mitra S.B. Post-cure flexural modulus in a new liner material. Journal of Dental Research 86, Special Iss A (2007) 2020
19. Alomari Q.D., Reinhardt J.W., and Boyer D.B. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Operative Dentistry 26 4 (2001) 406-411
20. Alomari Q., Ajlouni R., and Omar R. Managing the polymerization shrinkage of resin composite restorations: a review. South African Dental Journal 62 1 (2007) 12-16
21. Mitra SB, Rolf JC, Bui HT, Cummings KM, Randall R, and Rusin RP. Effect of an RMGI Liner on Polymerization Shrinkage of Composites. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A): #1072.
22. Watson T.F., Pagliari D., Sidhu S.K., and Naasan M.A. Confocal microscopic observation of structural changes in glass-ionomer cements and tooth interfaces. Biomaterials 19 (1998) 581-588
23. Fukuda R., Yoshida Y., Nakayama Y., Okazaki M., Inoue S., Sano H., et al. Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel and dentin. Biomaterials 24 11 (2003) 1861-1867
24. Mitra S.B., Lee C.Y., Bui H.T., Tantbirojn D., and Rusin R.P. Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dental Materials 25 (2009) 459-466
25. Friedl K.H., Powers J.M., and Hiller K.A. Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Operative Dentistry 20 2 (1995) 74-80
26. Prati C., Simpson M., Mitchem J., Tao L., and Pashley D.H. Relationship between bond strength and microleakage measured in the same Class I restorations. Dental Materials 8 (1992) 37-41
27. Mitra S.B. In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glass ionomer liner/base. Journal of Dental Research 70 (1991) 75-78
28. Fitch J, Cummings KM, Rusin RP. Fluoride release from a new protective coating. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A): #845.
29. ten Cate J.M., and van Duinen R.N. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. Journal of Dental Research 74 (1995) 1266-1271
30. Tantbirojn D., Douglas W.H., and Versluis A. Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote artificial caries. Caries Research 31 (1997) 275-280
31. Donly K.J., Segura A., Kanellis M., and Erickson R.L. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. Journal of the American Dental Association 130 (1999) 1459-1466
32. Glasspoole E.A., Erickson R.L., and Davidson C.L. Demineralization of enamel in relation to the fluoride release of materials. American Journal of Dentistry 14 (2001) 8-12
33. Coomes A, Donly K. Demineralization inhibition of glass ionomer base in class V preparations. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A) #364.
34. Tantbirojn D., Rusin R.P., Bui H.T., and Mitra S.B. In vitro dentin caries inhibition adjacent to a glass ionomer-composite sandwich restoration. Quintessence International 40 (2009) 287-294
35. Youngson C.C., Jones J.C., Fox K., Smith I.S., Wood D.J., and Gale M. A fluid filtration and clearing technique to assess microleakage associated with three dentine bonding systems. Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 223-233
36. Prati C., Tao L., Simpson M., and Pashley D.H. Permeability and microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry 22 (1994) 49-56
37. Özok A.R., DeGee A.J., Wu M.-K., and Wesselink P.R. The influence of resin composite and bonded amalgam restorations on dentine permeability in Class II cavities in vitro. Dental Materials 17 (2001) 477-484
38. Özok A.R., Wu M.-K., DeGee A.J., and Wesselink P.R. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strength of a total-etch vs. all-in-one adhesive. Dental Materials 20 (2004) 479-486
39. Yiu C.K.Y., Hiraishi N., Chersoni S., Breschi L., Ferrari M., Prati C., et al. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. II. Differential permeability reduction with an oxalate desensitizer. Journal of Dentistry 34 (2006) 106-116
40. Sauro S., Pashley D.H., Montanari M., Chersoni S., Carvalho R.M., Toledano M., et al. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dental Materials 23 (2007) 705-713
41. Ruhland A.R., Kolker J.L., Vargas M.A., and Armstrong S.R. Effect of self-etching primers on dentin permeability. Journal of Dental Research 82 (2002) 2626
42. Cadenaro M., Antoniolli F., Sauro S., Tay F.R., De Lenarda R., and Prati C. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. European Journal of Oral Science 113 (2005) 525-530
43. Tanaka H, Shimizu H, Sakamoto A, Yamamoto T, Nishtani Y, Yoshiyama M, et al., Journal of Dental Research 2007; 86 (Special Iss A): #362.
44. Grégoire G., Guignes P., and Millas A. Effect of self-etching adhesives on dentin permeability in a fluid flow model. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 93 (2005) 56-63
45. Orucoglu H., and Belli S. Evaluation of the effect of four self-etching adhesives on dentin permeability. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B: Applied Biomaterials 90 1 (2009) 110-115
46. Pashley D.H., Carvalho R.M., Pereira J.C., Villanueva R., and Tay F.R. The use of oxalate to reduce dentin permeability under adhesive restorations. American Journal of Dentistry 14 (2001) 89-94
47. ® desensitizer on dentine permeability and tubule occlusion over time, in vitro. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 25 (1998) 884-891
48. Camps J., Pizant S., Dejou J., and Franquin J.C. Effects of desensitizing agents on human dentin permeability. American Journal of Dentistry 11 (1998) 286-290
49. Sidhu S.K., Agee K.A., Waller J.L., and Pashley D.H. In vitro evaporative vs. convective water flux across human dentin before and after conditioning and placement of glass-ionomer cements. American Journal of Dentistry 17 (2004) 211-215
50. Kolker J.L., Vargas M.A., Armstrong S.R., and Dawson D.V. Effect of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability and tubule occlusion. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 (2002) 211-221
51. Rusin RP, Agee K, Suchko M, Cummings KM, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability of a new protective coating on smear-layer dentin. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss B): #2948.
52. Rusin RP, Agee K, Suchko M, Cummings KM, Pashley DH. Dentin Permeability of a New Protective Coating Material. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A): #1041.
53. Pashley D.H., Matthews W.G., Zhang Y., and Johnson M. Fluid shifts across human dentine in vitro in response to hydrodynamic stimuli. Archives of Oral Biology 41 (1996) 1065-1072
54. Charoenlarp P., Wanachantararak S., Vongsavan N., and Matthews B. Pain and the rate of dentinal fluid flow produced by hydrostatic pressure stimulation of exposed dentine in man. Archives of Oral Biology 52 (2007) 625-631
55. Gillam D.G., Mordan N.J., and Newman H.N. The dentin disc surface: a plausible model for dentin physiology and dentin sensitivity evaluation. Advances in Dental Research 11 (1997) 487-501
56. Pashley D.H., Livingston M.J., Reeder O.W., and Horner J. Effects of the degree of tubule occlusion on the permeability of human dentine in vitro. Archives of Oral Biology 23 (1978) 1127-1133
57. Oliveira S.S., Pugach M.K., Hilton J.F., Watanabe L.G., Marshall S.J., and Marshall Jr. G.W. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dental Materials 19 8 (2003) 758-767
58. Perdigão J., Lambrechts P., Van Meerbeek B., Vanherle G., and Lopes A.L. Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 29 9 (1995) 1111-1120
59. Van Meerbeek B., Vargas M., Inoue S., Yoshimda Y., Perdigão J., Lambrechts P., et al. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. American Journal of Dentistry 13 (2000) 3D-18D
60. Pashley D.H., Tao L., Boyd L., King G.E., and Horner J.A. Scanning electron microscopy of the substructure of smear layers in human dentine. Archives of Oral Biology 33 (1988) 265-270
61. Pashley D.H., and Dentin:. A dynamic substrate-a review. Scanning Microscopy 3 (1989) 161-174
62. Sidhu S.K., Agee K., and Pashley D.H. The influences of glass ionomers on water flux across dentin. Journal of Dental Research 82, Spec Iss B (2003) 203
63. Banomyong D., Palamara J.E., Burrow M.F., and Messer H.H. Effect of dentin conditioning on dentin permeability and micro-shear bond strength. European Journal of Oral Science 115 (2007) 502-509
64. Pashley D.H., and Carvalho R.M. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. Journal of Dentistry 25 (1997) 355-362
65. Lin A., McIntyre N.S., and Davidson R.D. Studies on the adhesion of glass ioner cements to dentin. Journal of Dental Research 71 (1992) 1836-1841
66. Titley K.C., Smith D.C., and Chernecky R. SEM observations of the reactions of the components of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement on bovine dentine. Journal of Dentistry 24 (1996) 411-416
67. Carvalho R.M., Yoshiyama M., Horner J.A., and Pashley D.H. Bonding mechanism of Variglass to dentin. American Journal of Dentistry 8 (1995) 253-258
68. Mitra SB, Bui HT, Cummings KM, Rolf JC, Rusin RP. Post-Cure adhesion of RMGI liner materials. Journal of Dental Research 2009; 88 (Spec Iss A): #3177.
69. Bui QNT, Perry R, Kugel G. Microleakage in Class V restorations in vitro. Journal of Dental Research 2008; 87 (Spec Iss A): #684.
70. De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. Shear bond strength of Vitrebond Plus to dentin and enamel. Journal of Dental Research 2007; 86 (Special Iss A): #2444.
71. Bui HT, Rolf JC, Cummings KM, Rusin RP, Mitra SB. Flexural Strength of a New Liner/Base Material. Journal of Dental Research 2006; 85 (Spec Iss A): #1892.