Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 421-426

  Briso, André Luiz Fraga ^a,d   Mestrener, Sandra Rahal ^a   Delício, Giovana ^a   Sundfeld, Renato Herman ^a   Bedran Russo, Ana Karina ^b   De Alexandre, Rodrigo Sversut ^c   Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria Bovi ^c  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RESIN; TPH SPECTRUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COLD; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FOLLOW UP; HEAT; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; BICUSPID; COLD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEAT; HUMANS; MASTICATION; MATRIX BANDS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENT; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RUBBER DAMS;

EID: 34548840302     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/06-141     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. rd ed Medico-Dental Publishing, Chicago.
2. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE & Dahl JE (1999) Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice Acta Odontologica Scandinavian 57(5) 257-262.
3. Swift EJ Jr (2001) Dentin bonding: What is the state of the art? Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 22(Supplement 12) 4-7; quiz 18.
4. Toledano M, Osorio R, Albaladejo A, Aguilera FS & Osorio E (2006) Differential effect of in vitro degradation on resindentin bonds produced by self-etch versus total-etch adhesives Journal Biomedical Materials Research part A 77(1) 128-135.
5. Deliperi S & Bardwell DN (2002) An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations Journal of the American Dental Association 133(10) 1387-1398.
6. Pereira JC & Segala AD (2002) [Hipersensibilidade pós-tratamento restaurador] In: Cardoso RJA & Gonçalves EAN Dentística Laser Artes Médicas São Paulo v 1 cap 19.
7. Gordan W & Mjör IA (2002) Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer Operative Dentistry 27(6) 543-548.
8. Christensen GJ (2002) Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in Class I, II and V restorations Journal of the American Dental Association 133(2) 229-231.
9. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M & Pashley DH (1996) A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief Operative Dentistry 21(1) 17-24.
10. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ & Verdonschot EH (1998) Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class II resin composite restorations in vivo Journal of Dentistry 26(7) 555-562.
11. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y & Akamine A (2001) Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: Clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program Journal of Dentistry 29(1) 7-13.
12. Hayashi M & Wilson NH (2003) Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity Operative Dentistry 28(6) 681-688.
13. 13.Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Pintado MR, DeLong R & Douglas WH (2004) Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration Dental Materials 20(6) 535-542.
14. Letzel H (1989) Survival rates and reasons for failure of composite restorations in a multicentre clinical trial Journal of Dentistry 17(Supplement 1) 10-17 (discussion) S26-28.
15. Stangel I & Barolet RY (1990) Clinical evaluation of two posterior composite resins: Two year results Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 17(3) 257-268.
16. Dunne SM & Abraham R (2000) Dental post-operative sensitivity associated with a gallium-based restorative material British Dental Journal 189(6) 310-313.
17. Opdam NJM, Loomans BAC, Roeters FU & Bronkhorst EM (2004) Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students Journal of Dentistry 32(5) 379-383
18. Grover PS, Lorton L & Hollinger J (1984) A clinical study of the incidence of pain after an operative treatment visit: Part II The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 51(3) 369-371.
19. Condon JR & Ferracane JL (2000) Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress Journal of the American Dental Association 131(4) 497-503.
20. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ & Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration Journal of Dental Research 66(11) 1636-1639.
21. Mjör IA & Ferrari M (2002) Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 6: Reactions to restorative materials, tooth restorations interfaces, and adhesive techniques Quintessence International 33(1) 35-63.
22. Perdigão J, Anauate-Netto C, Carmo AR, Hodges JS, Cordeiro HJ, Lewgoy HR, Dutra-Corrêa M, Castilhos N & Amore R (2004) The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on post-operative sensitivity: 2-week results Quintessence International 35(10) 777-784.
23. rd International Kuraray Symposium Italy 31-37.
24. Versluis A & Tantbirojn D (1999) Theoretical considerations of contraction stress Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (Supplement 25) 24-32 quiz S73.
25. Nalcaci A, Salbas M & Ulusoy N (2005) The effects of soft-start vs continuous-light polymerization on microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 7(4) 309-314.
26. Asmussen E & Peutzfeldt A (2005) Polymerization contraction of resin composite vs energy and power density of light-cure European Journal Oral Science 113(5) 417-421.
27. Brännström M & Astrom A (1972) The hydrodynamics of the dentine: Its possible relationship to dentinal pain International Dental Journal 22(2) 219-227.
28. Eick JD & Welch FH (1986) Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity Quintessence International 17(2) 103-111.
29. Jackson R (1999) The importance of technique in preventing postoperative sensitivity when placing bonded restorations Dental Today 18(9) 44-49.
30. 50.Davidson CL, de Gee AJ & Feilzer A (1984) The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and polymerization contraction stress Journal Dental Research 63(12) 1396-1399.
31. 51.Koshiro K, Inoue S, Sano H, De Munck J & Van Meerbeek B (2005) In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds produced by a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive European Journal Oral Science 113(4) 341-348.
32. Sobral MA, Garone-Netto N, Luz MA & Santos AP (2005) Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: A preliminary clinical trial Journal Oral Rehabilitation 32(9) 661-668.
33. Plamondon TJ, Walton R, Graham GS, Houston G & Snell G (1990) Pulp response to the combined effects of cavity preparation and periodontal ligament injection Operative Dentistry 15(3) 86-93.
34. Plant CG & Anderson RJ (1978) The effect of cavity depth on the pulpal response to restorative materials British Dental Journal 144(1) 10-13.
35. Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H & Van Meerbeek B (2005) Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin Dental Materials 21(2) 110-124.
36. Pashley DH (1996) Dynamics of the pulpo-dentin complex Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 7(2) 104-133.
37. Ikeda T, Nakano M, Bando E & Suzuki A (1998) The effect of light premature occlusal contact on tooth pain threshold in humans Journal Oral Rehabilitation 25(8) 589-595.
38. Hickel R & Manhart J (2001) Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(1) 45-64.
39. Frank RM, Wolff F & Gutmann B (1964) Electron microscopy of caries at the level of human enamel Archives of Oral Biology 9(2) 163-171.
40. Stanley HR, Pereira JC, Spiegel E, Broom C & Schultz M (1983) The detection and prevalence of reactive and physiologic sclerotic dentin, reparative dentin and dead tracts beneath various types of dental lesions according to tooth surface and age Journal of Oral Pathology Medicine 12(4) 257-289.