Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations

Quintessence International

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 55-59

  Gordan, Valeria V ^a   Mjör, Ivar A ^a   Hucke, Ronald D ^a   Smith, Gregory E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesive resin; Amalgam; Bonding agent; Cavity liner; Copal varnish; Glass ionomer cement; Postoperative sensitivity

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COPALITE; DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FUJI GLASS IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJI GLASS-IONOMER LINING CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; PLANT RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EVALUATION STUDIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, PLANT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0032612287     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Grover PS, Hollinger J, Lorton LA. A review of the incidence of pain after an operative treatment visit. Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:224-225.
2. Grover PS, Lorton LA, Hollinger J. A clinical study of the incidence of pain after an operative treatment visit. Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:369-371.
3. Lyon HE, Mitchell RJ. Pulp protection and basing procedures: A survey of dental schools. Oper Dent 1983;8: 106-111.
4. Lee SJ, Walton RE, Osborne JW. Pulp response to bases and cavity depths. Am J Dent 1992;5:64-68.
5. Andrews JT, Hembree JH Jr. Marginal leakage of amalgam alloys with high content of copper: A laboratory study. Oper Dent 1980;5:7-10.
6. Lin JH, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. Micro-structures of CU-rich amalgams after corrosion. J Dent Res 1983;62:112-115.
7. Pashley EL, Galloway SE, Pashley DH. Protective effects of cavity liners on dentin. Oper Dent 1990;15:10-17.
8. Chohayeb AA, Bowen RL, Adrian J. Pulpal response to a dentin and enamel bonding system. Dent Mater 1988;4: 144-146.
9. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265-273.
10. Nakabayashi N. Adhesive bonding with 4-Meta. Oper Dent 1992;17(suppl 5):125-130.
11. Prosser HJ, Powis DR, Brant P, Wilson AD. The characterization of glass-ionomer cements. The physical properties of current materials. J Dent 1984;12:231-240.
12. Causton B, Sefton J, Williams A. Bonding class II composite to etched glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1987;163:321-324.
13. Aboush YE, Jenkins CB. An evaluation of the bonding of a glass-ionomer restorative to dentin. Br Dent J 1986;161: 179-184.
14. van Dijken JWV, Horsdt PMA. In vivo adaptation of restorative materials to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:677-681.
15. Wilson AD, Groffman DM, Kuhn AT. The release of fluoride and other chemical species from a glass-ionomer cement. Biomater 1985;6:431-434.
16. Swift EJ Jr. Effects of glass ionomers on recurrent caries. Oper Dent 1989;14:40-43.
17. McCourt JW, Cooley RL, Huddleston AM. Fluoride release from fluoride-containing liners/bases. Quintessence Int 1990;21:41-45.
18. Maldonado A, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. An in vitro study of certain properties of a glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:785-791.
19. Soderholm KJM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: A report of the ASCMD 156 Task Group on test methods for the adhesion of restorative materials. Dent Mater 1991;7:74-83.
20. Fitzgerald M, Heys RJ. A clinical and histological evaluation of conservative pulpal therapy in human teeth. Oper Dent 1991;16:101-112.
21. Matthews WG, Showman CD, Pashley DH. Air blast-induced evaporative water loss from human dentine, in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:517-523.
22. Stanley HR, Swerdlow H. Reaction of the human pulp to cavity preparation: Results produced by eight different operative grinding technics. J Am Dent Assoc 1959;58(6):49-59.
23. Moulding MB, Loney RW. The effect of cooling techniques on intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:332-336.
24. Miller BC, Charbeneau GT. Sensitivity of teeth with and without cement bases under amalgam restorations: A clinical study. Oper Dent 1984;9:130-135.
25. Brännström M, Åström A. The hydrodynamics of the dentin: Its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972;22:219-227.
26. Pashley DH, Matthews WG. The effects of outward forced convective flow on inward diffusion in human dentine in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:577-582.
27. Garberoglio R, Brännström M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol 1976;21:355-362.
28. Mjör IA, Nordahl I. The density and branching of dentinal tubules in human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:401-412.
29. Pashley DH. Dentin-predentin complex and its permeability: Physiologic overview. J Dent Res 1985;64:613-620.
30. Pashley DH, Livingston MJ, Reeder OW, Horner J. Effects of the degree of tubule occlusion on the permeability of human dentine in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 1978;23:1127-1133.
31. White KC, Cox CF, Kanka J III, Dixon DL, Farmer JB, Snuggs HM. Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: Damp versus dry primer application. Quintessence Int 1994;25:259-268.
32. Pashley DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992;17:229-242.
33. Fujitani M, Inokoshi S, Hosoda H. Effect of acid etching on the dental pulp in adhesive composite restorations. Int Dent J 1992;42:3-11.
34. Nakabayashi N. The hybrid layer: A resin-dentin composite. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(suppl 1):321-329.
35. Stanley HR, Bowen RL, Cobb EN. Pulp responses to a dentin and enamel adhesive bonding procedure. Oper Dent 1988;13:107-113.
36. Suzuki S, Cox CF, White KC. Pulpal response after complete crown preparation, dentinal sealing, and provisional restoration. Quintessence Int 1994;25:477-485.
37. Ben-Amar A, Nordenberg D, Liberman R, Fischer J, Gorfil C. The control of marginal microleakage in amalgam restorations using a dentin adhesive: A pilot study. Dent Mater 1987;3:94-96.
38. Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN. Postoperative pain following bonded amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:66-71.
39. Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson SA, Wilson AD. Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res 1982;61:1416-1422.
40. 3. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:348-353.
41. Felton DA, Bergenholtz G, Kanoy BE. Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:292-298.
42. Calamia JR, Styner DL, Rattet AH. Effect of Amalgambond on cervical sensitivity. Am J Dent 1995;8:283-284.
43. Mahler DB, Nelson LW. Sensitivity answers sought in amalgam alloy microleakage study. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125: 282-288.
44. Brännström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984;9:57-68.
45. Silvestri AR, Cohen SH, Wetz JH. Character and frequency of discomfort immediately following restorative procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;95:85-89.
46. Johnson GH, Gordon GE, Bales DJ. Postoperative sensitivity associated with posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1988;13:66-73.