Reference-dependent residential location choice model within a relocation context

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2133, 2009, Pages 92-99

  Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul ^a   Miller, Eric J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HOUSING; LOCATION;

'CURRENT; ASYMMETRIC RESPONSE; CHOICE MODEL; DATA SET; LOCATION CHOICE; ONTARIO; REAL-ESTATES; RESIDENTIAL LOCATIONS; STATUS QUO; TORONTO;

LAND USE;

EID: 76149143963     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2133-10     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.106, No.4, 1991, pp. 1039-1061.
2. Hardie, B. G. S., E. J. Johnson, and P. S. Fader. Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice. Marketing Science, Vol.12, No.4, 1993, pp. 378-394.
3. Bell, D. R., and J. M. Lattin. Looking for Loss Aversion in Scanner Panel Data: The Confounding Effect of Price Response Heterogeneity. Marketing Science, Vol.19, No.2, 2000, pp. 185-200.
4. Klapper, D., C. Ebling, and J. Temme. Another Look at Loss Aversion in Brand Choice Data: Can We Characterize the Loss Averse Consumer? International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.22, 2005, pp. 239-254.
5. McFadden, D. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (A. Karlqvist et al., eds.), Elsevier Science Ltd., New York, 1978, pp. 72-77.
6. Friedman, J. A Conditional Logit Model of the Role of Local Public Services in Residential Choice. Urban Studies, Vol.18, 1981, pp. 347-358.
7. Ben-Akiva, M., and A. de Palma. Analysis of Dynamic Residential Location Choice Model with Transaction Costs. Journal of Regional Science, Vol.26, No.2, 1986, pp. 321-341.
8. Gabriel, S. A., and S. S. Rosenthal. Household Location and Race: Estimates of a Multinomial Logit Model. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.17, No.2, 1989, pp. 240-249.
9. Timmermans, H., A. Borgers, J. Dijk, and H. Oppewal. Residential Choice Behavior of Dual Earner Households: A Decompositional Joint Choice Model. Environment and Planning A, Vol.24, 1992, pp. 517-533.
10. Hunt, J. D., J. D. P. McMillan, and J. E. Abraham. Stated Preference Investigation of Influences on Attractiveness of Residential Locations. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 79-87.
11. Ben-Akiva, M., and J. L. Bowman. Integration of an Activity-Based Model System and a Residential Location Model. Urban Studies, Vol.35, No.7, 1998, pp. 1131-1153.
12. Sermons, M. W. Influence of Race on Household Residential Utility. Geographical Analysis, Vol.32, No.3, 2000, pp. 225-246.
13. Sermons, M. W., and F. S. Koppelman. Representing the Differences Between Female and Male Commute Behavior in Residential Location Choice Models. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.9, 2001, pp. 101-110.
14. Sermons, M. W., and N. Seredich. Assessing Traveler Responsiveness to Land and Location Based Accessibility and Mobility Solutions. Transportation Research Part D, Vol.6, 2001, pp. 417-428.
15. Bhat, C. R., and J. Y. Guo. A Mixed Spatially Correlated Logit Model: Formulation and Application to Residential Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Part B, Vol.38, No.2, 2004, pp. 147-168.
16. de Palma, A., N. Picard, and P. Waddell. Discrete Choice Models with Capacity Constraints: An Empirical Analysis of the Housing Market of the Greater Paris Region. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.62, 2007, pp. 204-230.
17. Weisbrod, G., S. Lerman, and M. Ben-Akiva. Tradeoffs in Residential Location Decisions: Transportation Versus Other Factors. Transportation Policy and Decision Making, Vol.1, 1980, pp. 13-26.
18. Habib, K. M. N., and K. M. Kockelman. Modeling Choice of Residential Location and Home Type: Recent Movers in Austin, Texas. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
19. Quigley, J. M. Consumer Choice of Dwelling, Neighborhood and Public Services. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol.15, 1985, pp. 41-63.
20. Lerman, S. R. Random Utility Models of Spatial Choice. In Optimization and Discrete Choice in Urban Systems: Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Directions in Urban Systems Modelling (B. G. Hutchinson, P. Nijkamp, and M. Batty, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.
21. Guo, J. Y. Addressing Spatial Complexities in Residential Location Choice Models. PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 2004.
22. Axhausen, K. W., D. M. Scott, A. König, and C. Jürgens. Locations, Commitments and Activity Spaces. Presented at the Survive Workshop, Bonn, Germany, Dec. 2001. www.ivt.ethz.ch/vpl/publications/reports/ ab96.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2008.
23. Zhou, B., and K. M. Kockelman. Microsimulation of Residential Land Development and Household Location Choices: Bidding for Land in Austin, Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.2077, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 106-112.
24. Porell, F. W. Models of Intraurban Residential Relocation. Kluwer- Nijhoff, Boston, Mass., 1982.
25. Clark, W. A. V. Comparing Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of Residential Mobility and Migration. Environment and Planning A, Vol.24, 1992, pp. 1291-1302.
26. Dieleman, F. M. Modeling Residential Mobility; A Review of Recent Trends in Research. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, Vol.16, 2001, pp. 249-265.
27. Habib, M. A., and E. J. Miller. Microbehavioural Location Choice Process: Estimation of a Random Parameter Model for Residential Mobility. Reviewed proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transportation Research, Berkeley, Calif., 2007.
28. Habib, M. A., and E. J. Miller. Microsimulating Residential Mobility and Spatial Search Behavior: Estimation of Continuous-Time Hazard and Discrete-Time Panel Logit Models for Residential Mobility. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
29. Scheiner, J. Housing Mobility and Travel Behaviour: A Process-Oriented Approach to Spatial Mobility, Evidence from a New Research Field in Germany. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.14, No.4, 2006, pp. 287-298.
30. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrica, Vol.47, 1979, pp. 263-291.
31. Avineri, E., and J. N. Prashker. Sensitivity to Uncertainty: Need for a Paradigm Shift. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1854, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 90-98.
32. Senbil, M., and R. Kitamura. Reference Points in Commuter Departure Time Choice: A Prospect Theoretic Test of Alternative Decision Frames. Intelligent Transportation System, Vol.8, 2004, pp. 19-31.
33. de Palma, A., and N. Picard. Equilibria and Information Provision in Risky Networks with Risk Averse Drivers. Transportation Science, Vol.40, No.4, 2006, pp. 393-408.
34. Masatlioglu, Y., and N. Uler. Contrasting Reference-Dependent Choice Models. Working paper. Department of Economics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2007. www-personal.umich.edu/?neslihan/Uler- referencedependent.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2008.
35. Odean, T. Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? Journal of Finance, Vol.53, No.5, 1998, pp. 1775-1798.
36. Genesove, D., and C. Mayer. Loss Aversion and Seller Behavior: Evidence From the Housing Market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.116, No.4, 2001, pp. 1233-1260.
37. Bell, D. E. Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty. Operations Research, Vol.33, No.1, 1985, pp. 1-27.
38. Gul, F. A Theory of Disappointment Aversion. Econometrica, Vol.95, No.3, 1991, pp. 667-686.
39. Koszegi, B., and M. Rabin. A Model of Reference-Dependent P. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.121, No.4, 2006, pp. 1133-1165.
40. Masatlioglu, Y., and E. A. Ok. Rational Choice with Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.121, 2005, pp. 1-29.
41. Train, K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2003.
42. Revelt, D., and K. Train. Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.80, 1998, pp. 1-11.
43. Mehndiratta, S. Time-of-Day Effects in Inter-City Business Travel. PhD thesis. University of California, Berkeley, 1996.
44. Ben-Akiva, M., and D. Bolduc. Multinomial Probit with a Logit Kernel and a General Parametric Specification of the Covariance Structure. Working paper. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
45. Revelt, D., and K. Train. Customer-Specific Taste Parameters and Mixed Logit: Households' Choice of Electricity Supplier. Working Paper E00-274. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, 2000.
46. Hensher, D., and W. H. Greene. The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice and Warning for the Unwary. Working paper. Department of Economics, New York University, 2001. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/ ?wgreene/. Accessed July 15, 2007.
47. Train, K. A Comparison of Hierarchical Bayes and Maximum Simulated Likelihood for Mixed Logit. Working paper. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, 2001.
48. Hajivassiliou, V., and P. Ruud. Classical Estimation Methods for LDV Models Using Simulation. In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol.IV (R. Engle and D. McFadden, eds.), Elsevier, New York, 1994, pp. 2383-2441.
49. McFadden, D., and K. Train. Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol.15, No.5, 2000, pp. 447-470.
50. Greene, W. H. Interpreting Estimated Parameters and Measuring Individual Heterogeneity in Random Coefficient Models. Working paper. Department of Economics, New York University, New York, 2004. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/? wgreene/. Accessed July 15, 2007.
51. Bhat, C. R. Simulation Estimation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models Using Randomized and Scrambled Halton Sequences. Transportation Research Part B, Vol.37, No.9, 2003, pp. 837-855.
52. Pushkar, A. O. Modelling Household Residential Search Processes: Methodology and Preliminary Results of an Original Survey. MASc thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada, 1998.
53. Haider, M. A Spatial Hedonic Price Index for Freehold Properties in the Greater Toronto Area-Application of Spatial Autoregressive Techniques. MASc thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada, 1999.
54. Bhat, C. R., and J. Y. Guo. A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels. Transportation Research Part B, Vol.41, No.5, 2007, pp. 506-526.
55. Guevara, C. A., and M. E. Ben-Akiva. Endogeneity in Residential Location Choice Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No 1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 60-66.