Endogeneity in residential location choice models

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1977, 2006, Pages 60-66

  Guevara, Cristian Angelo ^a,b   Ben Akiva, Moshe ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

^b SECTRA   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SITE SELECTION; TAXATION; URBAN PLANNING;

CONTROL FUNCTION METHOD; ENDOGENEITY; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION CHOICE MODELS;

LAND USE;

EID: 33947142305     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1977-10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bhat, C., and J. Guo. A Mixed Spatially Correlated Logit Model: Formulation and Application to Residential Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 147-168.
2. Sermonss, M., and F. Koppelman. Representing the Differences Between Female and Male Commute Behavior in Residential Location Choice Models. Geography, Vol. 9, 2001, pp. 101-110.
3. Levine, J. Rethinking Accessibility and Jobs-Housing Balance. Journal of American Planning Association, Vol. 64, 1998, pp. 133-149.
4. Waddell, P. A Multinomial Logit Model of Race and Urban Structure. Urban Geography, Vol. 13, 1992, pp. 127-141.
5. Quigley, J. Housing Demand in the Short Run: An Analysis of Politomous Choice. Explorations in Economic Research, Vol. 3, 1976, pp. 76-102.
6. Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes. Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium. Econometrica, Vol. 63, 1995, pp. 841-889.
7. Matzkin, R. Unobservable Instruments. Northwestern University, Evanston, HI. www.faculty-web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/matzkin/rosahome. html. Accessed Feb. 1, 2005.
8. Heckman, J. Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System. Econometrica, Vol. 46, 1978, pp. 931-959.
9. Hausman, J. Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, Vol. 46, 1978, pp. 1251-1272.
10. Petrin, A., and K. Train. Omitted Product Attributes in Discrete Choice Models. National Bureau of Economic Research, www.uchicago.edu/fac/ amil.petrin/research. Accessed Feb. 1, 2005.
11. Blundell, R., and J. Powell. Endogeneity in Semi-Parametric Binary Response Models. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 71, 2004, pp. 655-679.
12. Wooldridge, J. W. Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2002.
13. Greene, W. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, New York, 2003.
14. Walker, J. Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 2001.
15. Guevara, C. Addressing Endogeneity in Residential Location Models. Master's thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Mass., 2005.
16. Hausman, J. Valuation of New Goods Under Imperfect Competition. In The Economics of New Goods (R. Gordon and T. Bresnahan, eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 111., 1997.
17. Nevo, A. Measuring Market Power in the Ready to Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry. Econometrica, Vol. 69, 2001, pp. 307-342.
18. Bresnahan, T. The Apple-Cinnamon Cheerios War: Valuing New Goods, Identifying Market Power, and Economic Measurement. Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif, www.stanford.edu/-tbres/research.htm. Accessed Feb. 1, 2005.
19. Hahn, J., and J. Hausman. Weak Instruments: Diagnosis and Cures in Empirical Econometrics. American Economic Review, Vol. 93, 2003, pp. 118-128.
20. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
21. DICTUC. Encuesta Origen Destino De Viajes Santiago 2001 SECTRA, Transportation Engineering Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, Santiago, 2003.
22. Bayer, P., R. Macmillan, and K. Reuben. Residential Segregation in General Equilibrium. Department of Economics, Yale University, Hartford, Conn, www.aida.econ.yale.edu/~jb37/papers.htm. Accessed Feb. 1, 2005.
23. Ferreira, F. You Can Take It with You: Transferability of Proposition 13 Tax Benefits, Residential Mobility, and Willingness to Pay for Housing Amenities. Working Paper 72. Center for Labor Economics, University of California, Berkeley, 2004. www.emlab.berkeley.edu/users/cle/2004wp.html. Accessed Feb. 1, 2005.
24. Martinez, F. Towards a Land Use and Transport Interaction Framework. In Handbooks in Transport - Handbook I: Transport Modelling (D. Hensher and K. Button, eds.), Elsevier Science Ltd., Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2000, pp. 145-164.
25. Bierlaire, M., D. Bolduc, and M. Godbout. An Introduction to Biogeme (Version 1.0). www.roso.epfi.cn/mbi/biogeme/doc/tutorial.pdf.Accessed Feb. 1, 2005.