Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of differential object marking in spanish heritage speakers

Bilingualism

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 363-383

  Montrul, Silvina ^a   Bowles, Melissa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76149131375     PISSN: 13667289     EISSN: 14691841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909990071     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aissen, J. (2003). Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21 (3), 435-448.
2. Anderson, R. (1999).Noun phrase gender agreement in language attrition: Preliminary results. Bilingual Research Journal, 23, 318-337.
3. Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). The logical problem of second language learning. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, pp. 41-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bowles, M. & Montrul, S. (2009). Instructed L2 acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. In R. Leow, H. Campos & D. Lardiere (eds.), Little words: Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics and acquisition (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (GURT) 2007), pp. 199-210.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
5. Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T. & Baayen, H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Boume, I. Kraemer & J. Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, pp. 69-94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.
6. Bullock, B.&Toribio, A. J. (2004). Convergence as an emergent property in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 91-93.
7. Company, C. (2001). Multiple dative marking grammaticalization: Spanish as a special kind of primary object language. Studies in Language, 25, 1-47.
8. Company, C. (2002). El avance diacŕonico de la marcacíon prepositiva en objetos directos inanimados. In A. Bernab́e, J. A. Berenguer, M. Cantarero & J. C. de Torres (eds.), Presente y futuro de la ling̈úistica en España (vol. II), pp. 146-154. Madrid: SEL.
9. Cuervo, C. (2003). Datives at large. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
10. Demonte, V. (1995). Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus, 7, 5-30.
11. Dumitrescu, D. (1997). El paŕametro discursivo en la expresíon del objeto directo lexical: Español madrileño vs. español porteño. Signo y Seña, 7, 305-354.
12. Farley, A. P. & McCollam, K. (2004). Learner readiness and L2 production in Spanish: Processability theory on trial. Estudios de Ling̈úistica Aplicada, 22, 47-69.
13. Guijarro-Fuentes, P. & Marinis, T. (2007). Interpretation of personal -a features by L2 Spanish learners. Presented at the Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition 2007, University of Iowa.
14. Hulsen, M. (2000). Language loss and language processing: Three generations of Dutchmigrants inNewZealand. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
15. Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgezetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
16. Johnston, M. (1995). Stages of acquisition of Spanish as a second language. Sydney: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur, The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia, Language Acquisition Research Centre.
17. Laca, B. (2002). Gramaticalizacíon y variabilidad: propiedades inherentes y factores contextuales en la evolucíon del acusativo preposicional en español. In A. Wesch, W. Weidenbusch, R. Kailuweit & B. Laca (eds.), Sprachgeschichte als Varieẗatengeschichte, pp. 195-203. T̈ubingen: Stauffenburg.
18. Laca, B. (2006). El objeto directo: La marcacíon preposicional. In C. Company (ed.), Sintaxis hist́orica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal (vol. 1), pp. 421-475. Ḿexico: Fondo de Cultura Ecońomica y UNAM.
19. Leonetti, M. (2004). Specificity andDifferentialObject Marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 75-114.
20. Lidz, J. (2006). The grammar of accusative case in Kannada. Language, 82, 10-32.
21. Lightfoot, D. (1991). How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Lightfoot, D. (1999). The development of language. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Luj́an, M. & Parodi, C. (1996). Clitic-doubling and the acquisition of agreement in Spanish. In J. Gutíerrez-Rexach & L. Silva Villar (eds.), Perspectives on Spanish linguistics (vol. 1), pp. 119-138. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA, Department of Linguistics.
24. Lynch, A. (1999). The subjunctive in Miami Cuban Spanish, bilingualism, contact and language variability. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
25. Major, R. C. (1993). Sociolinguistic factors in loss and acquisition of phonology. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives, pp. 463-478. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Montrul, S. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 39-68.
27. Montrul, S. (2004a). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125-142.
28. Montrul, S. (2004b). The acquisition of Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Montrul, S. (2005). Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research, 21, 199-249.
30. Montrul, S. (2006). Incomplete acquisition as a feature of L2 and bilingual grammars. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul & P. Pŕevost (eds.), Inquiries in language development: Studies in honor of Lydia White, pp. 335-359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Montrul, S. (2007). Interpreting mood distinctions in Spanish as a heritage language. In K. Potowski & R. Cameron (eds.), Spanish contact: Policy, social and linguistic inquiries, pp. 23-40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Reexamining the age factor (Studies in Bilingualism 39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Montrul, S. (in press). Dominant language transfer in Spanish L2 learners and heritage speakers. Special issue of Second Language Research (2010).
34. Montrul, S., Foote, R. & Perpiñ́an, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58 (3), 503-553.
35. Montrul, S. & Potowski, K. (2007). Command of gender agreement in school-age Spanish-English bilingual children. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 301-328.
36. Pereltsvaig, A. (2005). Aspect lost, aspect regained. In R. Slabakova & P. Kempchinski (eds.), Aspectual inquiries, pp. 369-395. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
37. Polinsky, M. (1997). American Russian: Language loss meets language acquisition. Proceedings of the Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, pp. 370-406. Ann Arbor, MI: Slavic Publications.
38. Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191-262.
39. Rodŕiguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2007). The syntax of objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
40. Rodŕiguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2008). The acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Probus, 20, 1-31.
41. Schachter, J. (1990). On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 6, 93-124.
42. Silva-Corvaĺan, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Silva-Corvaĺan, C. (2003). Linguistic consequences of reduced input in bilingual first language acquisition. In S. Montrul & F. Ord́oñez (eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages, pp. 375-397. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
44. Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in native and non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22-47.
45. Sorace, A. (2000). Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers. Proceedings of the 24th Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 719-725. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
46. Sorace, A. (2004). Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretation and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 143-145.
47. Suñer, M. (1988). The role of agreement in dative doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 6, 391-434.
48. Toribio, J. & Nye, C. (2006). Restructuring of reverse psychological predicate in bilingual Spanish. In J. Montreuil & C. Nishida (eds.), New perspectives in Romance linguistics, pp. 263-277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
49. Torrego, E. (1998). The dependency of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Ura, H. (1996). Multiple theory checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
51. VanPatten, B. (2002). From input to output: A teacher's guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw Hill.
52. VanPatten, B. & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
53. Weissenrieder, M. (1985). Exceptional uses of the accusative A. Hispania, 68, 393-398.
54. Weissenrieder, M. (1990). Variable uses of the direct-object marker A. Hispania, 73, 223-231.
55. Weissenrieder, M. (1991). A functional approach to the accusative A. Hispania, 74, 146-156.
56. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M. & Leung, Y.-K. I. (2004). Gender agreement in nonnative Spanish: Evidence against failed features. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 105-133.
58. Zagona, K. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Zapata, G., Śanchez, L. & Toribio, A. J. (2005). Contact and contracting Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 377-395.