The grammar of accusative case in Kannada

Language

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 10-32

  Lidz, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748295939     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2006.0054     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AISSEN, JUDITH. 2004. Differential object marking: Economy vs. iconicity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21.435-83.
2. AMRITAVALLI, R. 1998. Kannada clause structure. Paper presented at Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW), Hyderabad, India, January 1998.
3. ANDERSON, STEPHEN. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. ARAD, MAYA. 1999. On 'little v'. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 33.1-25.
5. ARONOFF, MARK. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. BAKER, MARK. 1985. Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. BALTIN, MARK. 1977. Quantifier-negative interactions. Studies in language variation, ed. by Roger Shuy and Ralph Fasold, 30-36. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8. BEARD, ROBERT. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9. BLEAM, TONIA. 1999. Clitic doubling in leista Spanish. Newark: University of Delaware dissertation.
10. BRIGHT, WILLIAM. 1958. An outline of colloquial Kannada. Pune: Deccan College Postgraduate Research Institute.
11. BRUGÉ, LAURA. 2002. The position of demonstratives in the extended nominal projection. The functional structure of DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, 15-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. GARDEN, GUY. 1973. Disambiguation, favored readings, and variable rules. New ways of analyzing variation in English, ed. by C.-J. N. Bailey and Roger Shuy, 171-82. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
13. CHUNG, SANDRA, and WILLIAM LADUSAW. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. COMRIE, BERNARD. 1979. Definite and animate direct objects: A natural class. Linguistica Silesiana 3.13-21.
15. CROFT, WILLIAM. 1988. Agreement vs. case-marking and direct objects. Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions, ed. by Michael Barlow and Charles A. Ferguson, 159-80. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
16. DAYAL, VENEETA. 2003. A semantics for pseudo-incorporation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, MS.
17. DAYAL, VENEETA. 2004. Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27.393-450.
18. DE HOOP, HELEN. 1996. Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation. New York: Garland.
19. DIESING, MOLLY. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. EMBICK, DAVID. 1997. Voice and the interfaces of syntax. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
21. ENÇ, MÜRVET. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22.1-26.
22. ENGDAHL, ELISABETH. 1986. Constituent questions: The syntax and semantics of questions with special reference to Swedish. Dordrecht: Reidel.
23. FARKAS, DONKA. 1995. Specificity and scope. Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz, MS.
24. FARKAS, DONKA, and HENRIETTA DE SWART. 2003. The semantics of incorporation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
25. FODOR, JANET A., and IVAN SAG. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5.355-98.
26. HALLE, MORRIS, and ALEC MARANTZ. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. The view from Building 20, ed. by Kenneth Hale and Samual Jay Keyser, 53-110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. HEIM, IRENE. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst dissertation.
28. HINTIKKA, JAAKO. 1986. The semantics of a certain. Linguistic Inquiry 12.331-36.
29. HOLMBERG, ANDERS. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in Scandinavian languages and English. Stockholm: Department of General Linguistics, University of Stockholm.
30. HOPPER, PAUL, and SANDRA THOMPSON. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 56.251-99.
31. KEACH, CAMELIA. 1995. SM and OM as agreement and PI in Swahili. Theoretical approaches to African linguistics, ed. by Akinbiyi Akinlabi, 109-16. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
32. KIPARSKY, PAUL. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. The projection of arguments, ed. by Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder, 265-308. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
33. KRATZER, ANGELIKA. 1998. Scope or pseudo-scope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? Events and grammar, ed. by Susan Rothstein, 163-96. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34. LIDZ, JEFFREY. 1996. Dimensions of reflexivity. Newark: University of Delaware dissertation.
35. LIDZ, JEFFREY, and JULIEN MUSOLINO. 2002. Children's command of quantification. Cognirion 84.113-54.
36. LIDZ, JEFFREY, and JULIEN MUSOLINO. 2006. On the quantificational status of indefinites: The view from child language. Language Acquisition, to appear.
37. MAHAJAN, ANOOP. 1990. The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
38. MATTHEWSON, LISA. 1999. On the interpretation of wide scope indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 7.79-134.
39. MOHANAN, TARA. 1995. Wordhood and lexicality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13.75-134.
40. MUSOLINO, JULIEN, and JEFFREY LIDZ. 2003. The scope of isomorphism: Turning adults into children. Language Acquisition 11.277-91.
41. MUSOLINO, JULIEN, and JEFFREY LIDZ. 2006. Why children are not universally successful with quantification. Linguistics, to appear.
42. MUSOLINO, JULIEN; STEPHEN CRAIN; and ROSALIND THORNTON. 2001. Navigating negative quantificational space. Linguistics 38.1-32.
43. POSTAL, PAUL. 1969. Anaphoric islands. Chicago Linguistic Society 5.209-39.
44. REINHART, TANYA. 1997. Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice-functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20.335-97.
45. RUYS, EDDY G. 1992. The scope of indefinites. Utrecht: OTS, University of Utrecht dissertation.
46. SADOCK, JERROLD. 1980. Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation. Language 57.300-319.
47. SAPIR, EDWARD. 1911. The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 13.250-82.
48. SPENSER, H. 1914. A Kanarese grammar with graduated exercises. Mysore: Wesleyan Mission Press.
49. SPORTICHE, DOMINIQUE. 1996. Clitic constructions. Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. by Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, 213-76. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
50. SRIDHAR, S. N. 1979. Dative subjects and the notion of subjects. Lingua 49.1-28.
51. SRIDHAR, S. N. 1990. Kannada. London: Routledge.
52. STEEDMAN, MARK. 2004. Surface-compositional scope-alternation without existential quantifiers. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, MS. Online: ftp://ftp.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/pub/steedman/quantifiers/journal5.pdf.
53. TORREGO, ESTHER. 1998. The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. VAN GEENHOVEN, VEERLE. 1995. Semantic incorporation: A uniform semantics for West Greenlandic noun incorporation and Germanic bare plural configurations. Chicago Linguistic Society 31.171-86.
55. VERMA, MANINDRA K., and K. P. MOHANAN (eds.) 1990. Experiencer subjects in South Asian languages. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
56. ZIMMERMAN, THOMAS EDE. 1993. On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1.149-79.