LIBRUS: Combined machine learning and homology information for sequence-based ligand-binding residue prediction

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 23, 2009, Pages 3099-3107

  Kauffman, Chris ^a   Karypis, George ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LIGANDS; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOFTWARE;

EID: 75949116562     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp561     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Altschul, S. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
2. Berman, H.M. et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242.
3. Bleicher, K.H. et al. (2003) Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2, 369-378.
4. Bock, J.R. and Gough, D.A. (2005)Virtuals creen for ligands of orphan g protein-coupled receptors. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 45, 1402-1414.
5. Brylinski, M. and Skolnick, J. (2008) A threading-based method (findsite) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 129-134.
6. Chandonia, J.-M. et al. (2002) Astral compendium enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 260-263.
7. Chen, K. and Kurgan, L. (2007) Pfres: protein fold classification by using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure. Bioinformatics, 23, 2843-2850.
8. Fawcett, T. (2006)An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 27, 861-874.
9. Fischer, J.D. et al. (2008) Prediction of protein functional residues from sequence by probability density estimation. Bioinformatics, 24, 613-620.
10. Ginalski, K. et al. (2003) ORFeus: detection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3804-3807.
11. Heger, A. and Holm, L. (2001) Picasso: generating a covering set of protein family profiles. Bioinformatics, 17, 272-279.
12. Joachims, T. (1999) Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Karypis, G. (2006) YASSPP: better kernels and coding schemes lead to improvements in SVM-based secondary structure prediction. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform., 64, 575-586.
14. Kauffman, C. et al. (2008) Improving homology models for protein-ligand binding sites. In LSS Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conference, San Francisco, CA. Available at www.cs.umn.edu/~karypis (last accessed date October 12, 2009).
15. López, G. et al. (2007) firestar-prediction of functionally important residues using structural templates and alignment reliability. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W573-W577.
16. Mittelman, D. et al. (2003) Probabilistic scoring measures for profile-profile comparison yield more accurate short seed alignments. Bioinformatics, 19, 1531-1539.
17. Moitessier, N. et al. (2007) Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking//scoring methods: a long way to go. Br. J. Pharmacol., 153, S7-S26.
18. Petrova, N.V. and Wu, C.H. (2006) Prediction of catalytic residues using support vector machine with selected protein sequence and structural properties. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 312.
19. Rangwala, H. and Karypis, G. (2007) frmsdpred: predicting local RMSD between structural fragments using sequence information. Comput. Syst. Bioinform. Conf., 6, 311-322.
20. Rangwala, H. et al. (2007) A generalized framework for protein sequence annotation. In Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Machine Learning in Computational Biology. Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
21. Sobolev, V. et al. (1999) Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics, 15, 327-332.
22. Vapnik, V.N. (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York.
23. Weber, D. et al. (2002) Systematic optimization of a lead-structure identities for a selective short peptide agonist for the human orphan receptor BRS-3. J. Pept. Sci., 8, 461-475.
24. Youn, E. et al. (2007) Evaluation of features for catalytic residue prediction in novel folds. Protein Sci., 16, 216-226.