Sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation for distributed hydrological modeling: Potential of variational methods

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 503-517

  Castaings, W ^a,b,d   Dartus, D ^a   Le Dimet, F X ^b   Saulnier, G M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

^d JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT; FLASH FLOOD; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; INFILTRATION; KINEMATICS; OVERLAND FLOW; PARAMETERIZATION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RIVER BASIN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 75749154472     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-13-503-2009     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Bastidas, L. A., Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., Shuttleworth, W., and Yang, Z.: Sensitivity Analysis of a Land Surface Scheme using Multi-Criteria Methods, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 19481-19490, 1999.
2. Belanger, E. and Vincent, A.: Data assimilation (4D-VAR) to forecast flood in shallow-waters with sediment erosion, J. Hydrol., 300, 114-125, 2005.
3. Bennett, A.: Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
4. Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models : model calibration and predictive uncertainty, Hydrol. Process., 279-298, 1992.
5. Bouyssel, F., Cassé, V., and Pailleux, J.: Variational surface analysis from screen level atmospheric parameters, Tellus A, 51, 453-+, 1999.
6. Buizza, R. and Palmer, T. N.: The singular vector structure of the global atmospheric global circulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1434-1456, 1995.
7. Cacuci, D.: Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. I. Nonlinear functional analysis approach, J. Math. Phys., 22(12), 2794-2802, 1981a.
8. Cacuci, D.: Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. II. Extensions to additional classes of responses, J. Math. Phys., 22(12), 2803-2812, 1981b.
9. Callies, U., Rhodin, A., and Eppel, D. P.: A case study on variational soil moisture analysis from atmospheric observations, J. Hydrol., 212-213, 95-108, 1998.
10. Calvet, J.-C., Noilhan, J., and Bessemoulin, P.: Retrieving the Root- Zone Soil Moisture from Surface Soil Moisture or Temperature Estimates: A Feasibility Study Based on Field Measurements, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 371-386, 1998.
11. Carrera, J. and Neuman, S.: Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 2. Uniqueness, stability and solution algorithms, Water Resour. Res., 2, 211-227, 1986.
12. Chavent, G.: Identification of functional parameter in partial differential equations, in: Identification of Parameters in Distributed Systems, edited by: Goodson R. E., and Polis, M., ASME, New York, 31-48, 1974.
13. Clément, F., Khvoenkova, N., Cartalade, A., and Montarnal, P.: Analyse de sensibilité et estimation de param̀etres de transport pour une équation de diffusion, approche par état adjoint, INRIARocquencourt, Projet ESTIME, Tech. Rep. RR-5132, 2004.
14. Cukier, R., Levine, H., and Shuler, K.: Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems, J. Comput. Phys., 26, 1-42, 1978.
15. Doherty, J. and Randall, J. H.: Two Statistics for Evaluating Parameter Identifiability and Error Reduction, J. Hydrol., 366(1-4), 119-127, 2009.
16. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Effective and Efficient Global Optimisation for Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models, Water Resour. Res., 28, 1015-1031, 1992.
17. Durbiano, S.: Vecteurs caractéristiques de mod̀eles océaniques pour la réduction d'ordre en assimilation de données, Ph.D. thesis, Université Joseph Fourier (Grenoble I), 2001.
18. Estupina-Borrell, V., Dartus, D., and Ababou, R.: Flash flood modeling with the MARINE hydrological distributed model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 3, 3397-3438, 2006, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/3/ 3397/2006/.
19. Ghil, M. and Malanotte-Rizzoli, P.: Data assimilation in meteorology and oceanography, Adv. Geophys., 33, 141-226, 1991.
20. Griewank, A.: Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation, in: Frontiers in Appl. Math., SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, Vol.19, 369 pp., 2000.
21. Gupta, V. and Sorooshian, H.: The automatic calibration of conceptual catchment models using derivative based optimization algorithms, Water Ressour. Res., 21, 473-485, 1985.
22. Hall, C. and Cacuci, D.: Physical interpretation of the adjoint functions for sensitivity analysis of atmospheric models, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 2537-2546, 1983.
23. Hall, J., Tarantola, S., Bates, P., and Horritt, M.: Distributed Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Inundation Model Calibration, J. Hydraul. Eng.-ASCE, 131, 117-126, 2005.
24. Hansen, P.: Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems. Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1998.
25. Hascöet, L. and Pascual, V.: TAPENADE 2.1 user's guide, Tech. Rep. RT-0300, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA), 2004.
26. Helton, J. C.: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 42, 327-367, 1993.
27. Homma, T. and Saltelli, A.: Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 52, 1-17, 1996.
28. Honnorat, M., Monnier, J., Lai, X., and Le dimet, F.-X.: Variational data assimilation for 2D fluvial hydraulics simulation, in: CMWR XVI-Computational Methods for Water Ressources, Copenhagen, 2006.
29. Hornberger, G. and Spear, R.: An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems, J. Environ. Manage.t, 12, 7-18, 1981.
30. Ibbit, R. and O'Donnell, T.: Designing conceptual catchment models for automatic fitting methods, IAHS Publication, 101, 462-475, 1971.
31. Johnston, P. and Pilgrim, D.: Parameter optimization for watershed models, Water Resour. Res., 12, 477-486, 1976.
32. Kanso, A., Chebbo, G., and Tassin, B.: Application of MCMCGSA model calibration method to urban runoff quality modeling, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 91, 1398-1405, 2006.
33. Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., and Franks, S. W.: Calibration of conceptual hydrological models revisited: 2. Improving optimisation and analysis, J. Hydrol., 320, 187-201, 2006. (Pubitemid 43294707)
34. Kuczera, G. and Parent, E.: Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm, J. Hydrol., 211, 69-85, 1998.
35. Le Dimet, F.-X. and Talagrand, O.: Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorogical observations, Tellus A, 38, 97-110, 1986.
36. Lemarchal, C. and Panier, E.: Les modules M2QN1 et MQHESS, 2000.
37. Li, Z., Navon, I., and Hussaini, M. Y.: Analysis of the singular vectors of the full-physics Florida State University Global Spectral Model, Tellus A, 57, 560-574, 2005.
38. Lions, J.: Optimal control of systems governed by partial differential equations, Springer-Verlag, 1968.
39. Madsen, H.: Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives, Adv. Water Resour., 26, 205-216, 2003.
40. Mahfouf, J.-F.: Analysis of Soil Moisture from Near-Surface Parameters: A Feasibility Study, J. Appl. Meteorol., 30, 1534-1547, 1991.
41. Marchand, E., Clément, F., Roberts, J. E., and Pépin, G.: Deterministic sensitivity analysis for a model for flow in porous media, Adv. Water Resour., 31(8), 1025-1037, 2008.
42. Margulis, S. and Entekhabi, D.: A coupled Land Surface-Boundary Layer Model and its adjoint, J. Hydrometeorol., 2, 274-296, 2001.
43. McCuen, R.: Component sensitivity: a tool for the analysis of complex water resources systems,Water Resour. Res., 9(1), 243-247, 1973a.
44. McCuen, R.: The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modelling., J. Hydrol., 18, 37-53, 1973b.
45. Moore, C. and Doherty, J.: The cost of uniqueness in groundwater model calibration, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 605-623, 2006a.
46. Moore, C. and Doherty, J.: Role of the calibration process in reducing model predictive error, Water Resour. Res., 41, W05020, doi:10.1029/ 2004WR003501, 2006b.
47. Navon, I.: Practical and Theoretical Aspect of Adjoint Parameter Estimation and Identifiability in Meteorology and Oceanography, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 27, 55-79, 1998.
48. Ngnepieba, P., Le Dimet, F.-X., Boukong, A., and Nguetseng, G.: Inverse problem formulation for parameters determination using the adjoint method, ARIMA Journal - Revue Africaine de la Recherche in Informatique et Mathématiques Appliquées, 1, 127-157, 2002.
49. Piasecki, M. and Katopodes, N.: Control of Contaminant Releases in Rivers and Estuaries. Part I: Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis, J. Hydraul. Eng.-ASCE, 123, 486-492, 1997.
50. Rall, L. B.: Automatic Differentiation: Techniques and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 120, Springer, Berlin, 1981.
51. Refsgaard, J.: Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 198, 69-97, 1997.
52. Reichle, R., Entekhabi, D., and McLaughlin, D.: Downscaling of radiobrightness measurements for soil moisture estimation: A four-dimensional variational data assimilation approach, Water Resour. Res., 37(9), 2353-2364, 2001.
53. Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E.: Sensitivity analysis, Wiley series in probability and statistics, Wiley, 2000.
54. Sei, A. and Symes, W.: A note on consistency and adjointness for numerical schemes, Tech. rep., Department of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Rice University, Tech. Report TR95- 04, 1995.
55. Seo, D., Koren, V., and Cajina, N.: Real-Time Variational Assimilation of Hydrologic and Hydrometeorological Data into Operational Hydrologic Forecasting, J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 627-641, 2003a.
56. Seo, D., Koren, V., and Cajina, N.: Real-time assimilation of radarbased precipitation data and streamflow observations into a distributed hydrologic model, Proceedings of Symposium HS03 held during IUGG2003 at Sapporo, IAHS Publ., 282, 138-142, 2003b.
57. Singh, V.: Kinematic wave in water ressources: a historical perspective, Hydrol. Process., 15, 671-706, 2001.
58. Sirkes, Z. and Tziperman, E.: Finite difference of adjoint or adjoint of finite difference?, Mon. Weather rev., 49, 5-40, 1997.
59. Sobol', I.: Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models, Mathematical Modeling & Computational Experiment, 1, 407-414, 1993 (Engl. transl.).
60. Sun, N.-Z. and Yeh, W.-G.: Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling 1. Sensitivity and parameter identification,Water Resour. Res., 26, 2507-2525, 1990.
61. Tang, Y., Reed, P., van Werkhoven, K., and Wagener, T.: Advancing the identification and evaluation of distributed rainfall-runoff models using global sensitivity analysis, Water Resour. Res., 43, W06415, doi:10.1029/2006WR005813, 2007a. (Pubitemid 47124438)
62. Tang, Y., Reed, P.,Wagener, T., and vanWerkhoven, K.: Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 793-817, 2007b, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/793/2007/.
63. Tikhononv, A. N. and Arsenin, V. Y.: Solutions of Ill-posed Problems, W. H. Winston, Washington, DC, 1977.
64. Tonkin, M. J. and Doherty, J.: A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parametrized environmental models, Water Resour. Res., 41, W10412, doi:10.1029/2005WR003995, 2005. (Pubitemid 41705697)
65. Van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y.: Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01429, doi:10.1029/2007WR0062711, 2008a.
66. Van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y.: Rainfall characteristics define the value of streamflow observations for distributed watershed model identification, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L11403, doi:10.1029/2008GL034162, 2008b.
67. Vrugt, J. A., Bouten, W., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved identifiability of hydrologic model parameters: The information content of experimental data, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1312, doi:10.1029/ 2001WR001118, 2002.
68. Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bastidas, L. A., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S.: Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1214, doi:10.1029/2002WR001746, 2003a.
69. Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S.: A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1201, doi:10.1029/2002WR001642, 2003b.
70. Wagener, T., McIntyre, N., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis, Hydrol. Process., 17, 455-476, 2003.
71. White, L., Vieux, B., Armand, D., and Le Dimet, F.-X.: Estimation of optimal parameters for a surface hydrology model, Adv.Water Resour., 26(3), 337-348, 2003.
72. Yapo, P., Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S.: Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 204, 83-97, 1997.
73. Yatheendradas, S., Wagener, T., Gupta, H., Unkrich, C., Goodrich, D., Schaffner, M., and Stewart, A.: Understanding uncertainty in distributed flash flood forecasting for semiarid regions, Water Resour. Res., 44, W05S19, doi:10.1029/2007WR005940, 2008. (Pubitemid 351897353)
74. Zou, X., Navon, I. M., and Sela, J.: Variational data Assimilation with Moist Threshold Processes using the NMC Spectral Model, Tellus A, 45(5), 370-387, 1993.