The cost of uniqueness in groundwater model calibration

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 605-623

  Moore, Catherine ^a   Doherty, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Model calibration; PEST; Pilot points; Regularization; Resolution matrix

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC MODELS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

GROUNDWATER MODEL; MODEL CALIBRATION; PEST; PILOT POINTS; RESOLUTION MATRIX;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

CALIBRATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC MODELS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CALIBRATION; GROUNDWATER; HYDRAULIC PROPERTY; INVERSE PROBLEM; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 31644442912     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Trans Automat Contr AC19 6 1974 716-723
2. Anderman ER, Hill MC. MODFLOW-2000, the US Geological Survey modular ground-water model-documentation of the ADVective - Transport observations (ADV2) Package: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-54, 2001, 69p.
3. M.P. Anderson W.W. Woessner Applied groundwater modeling-simulation of flow and advective transport 1992 Academic Press
4. F. Babiloni F. Carducci F. Cincotti C. Del Gratta V. Pizzella G.L. Romani et al. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements Hum Brain Map 14 4 2001 197-209
5. G. Backus F. Gilbert Numerical application of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems Geophys J Roy Astr S 13 1967 247-276
6. G. Backus F. Gilbert The resolving power of gross earth data Geophys J Roy Astr S 16 1969 169-205
7. G.E. Backus F. Gilbert Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data Philos Tr R Soc S A 266 1173 1970 123-192
8. Y. Bard Nonlinear parameter estimation 1974 Academic Press New York
9. H. Bertete-Aguirre E. Cherkaev M. Oristaglio Non-smooth gravity problem with total variation penalization functional Geophys J Int 149 2 2002 499-507
10. I. Braud C. Obled On the use of empirical orthogonal functions analysis in the simulation of random fields: Stochastic hydrol Hydraul 5 2 1991 125-134
11. J.J. Butler Jr. C.D. McElwee G.C. Bohling Pumping tests in networks of multilevel sampling wells: Motivation and methodology Water Resour Res 35 11 1999 3553-3560
12. J.E. Capilla J. Rodrigo J.J. Gómez-Hernández Simulation of non-Gaussian hydraulic conductivity fields honoring piezometric data and integrating soft and secondary information Math Geol 31 7 1999 907-927
13. J. Carrera S.P. Neuman Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady-state conditions. 2. Uniqueness, stability, and solution algorithms Water Resour Res 22 2 1986 211-227
14. C. Certes G. de Marsily Application of the pilot points method to the identification of aquifer transmissivities Adv Water Resour 14 5 1991 284-300
15. S. Christensen R.L. Cooley Evaluation of prediction intervals for expressing uncertainties in groundwater flow model predictions Water Resour Res 35 9 1996 2627-2639
16. S. Christensen R.L. Cooley Evaluation of confidence intervals for a steady-state leaky aquifer model Adv Water Resour 22 8 1999 807-817
17. Christensen S, Cooley RL. Experiences from the testing of a theory for modeling groundwater flow in heterogeneous media. Proceedings of ModelCARE'2002, Prague, Czech Republic, 17-20 June 2002. IAHS publ. no. 2002; p. 22-7.
18. Christensen S, Moore C, Doherty J. Comparison of stochastic and regression based methods for quantification of predictive uncertainty of model-simulated wellhead protection zones in heterogeneous aquifers. ModelCARE'2005 conference paper, The Hague, Netherlands, 6-9 June 2005.
19. Clemo T, Michaels P, Lehman RM. Transmissivity Resolution Obtained from the Inversion of Transient and Pseudo-Steady Drawdown Measurements. MODFLOW and More 2003: Understanding through Modeling - Conference proceedings 2003; Poeter,Zheng, Hill & Doherty. Downloadable from: www.mines.edu/igwmc
20. Cooley RL. A theory for Modeling Ground-Water Flow in Heterogeneous Media. Reston, VA, US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1679, 2004.
21. F. Delay A. Buoro G.de Marsily Empirical orthogonal function analysis applied to the inverse problem in hydrogeology: Evaluation of uncertainty and simulation of new solutions Math Geology 33 8 2001 927-949
22. J. Doherty Groundwater model calibration using pilot points and regularization Ground Water 41 2 2003 170-177
23. Doherty J. Version 5 of PEST Manual. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane Australia; 2003. Downloadable from: http://www.sspa.com/pest
24. N.R. Draper H. Smith Applied regression analysis Third ed. 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York
25. H.W. Engl M. Hanke A. Neubauer Regularization of inverse problems 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
26. J.J. Gómez-Hernández A. Sahuquillo J.E. Capilla Stochastic simulation of hydraulic conductivity fields conditional to both hydraulic conductivity and piezometric data. 1 Theory J Hydrol 20 1997 162-174
27. V.M. Gorokhovski Problem-dependence of ground-water model identification: Significance, extent, and treatment Ground Water 34 3 1996 461-469
28. A. Guadagnini S.P. Neuman Nonlocal and localized analyses of conditional mean steady state flow in bounded, randomly uniform domains, 1, theory and computational approach Water Resour Res 35 10 1999 2999-3018
29. Haber E. Numerical strategies for the solution of inverse problems. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Canada, 1997.
30. Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG. The US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow process. US Geological Survey Open File Report 00-92. Reston, Virginia, 2000.
31. Hill MC. Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration. US Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4005, 1998.
32. M.C. Hill O. Osterby Determining extreme parameter correlation in Ground Water Models Ground Water 41 4 2003 420-430
33. L.Y. Hu Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of gaussian-related stochastic models Math Geol 32 1 2000 87-108
34. D.D. Jackson Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data Geophys J Roy Astr S 28 1972 97-109
35. P.K. Kitanidis The minimum structure solution to the inverse problem Water Resour Res 33 10 1997 2263-2272
36. K.R. Koch Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin
37. A.M. LaVenue B.S. RamaRao G. de Marsily M.G. Marietta Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated hydraulic conductivity fields. 2 Appl Water Resour Res 31 3 1995 495-516
38. L.R. Lines S.T. Treitel A review of least-squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems Geophys Prospect 32 2 1984 159-186
39. B. Lutkenhoner R.G.D.P. Menendez The resolution-field concept Electroen Clin Neuro 102 4 1997 326-334
40. R.L. Mackie T.R. Madden Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients Geophys J Int 115 1993 215-229
41. A. Mantoglou Estimation of heterogeneous aquifer parameters from piezometric data using ridge functions and neural networks Stoch Env Res Risk A 17 5 2003 339-352
42. R.G.D.P. Menendez S.L.G. Andino B. Lutkenhoner Figures of merit to compare distributed linear inverse solutions Brain Topogr 9 2 1996 117-124
43. W. Menke Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inverse theory 1984 Academic Press Inc
44. Mikhail EM with contributions by Ackerman F. Observations and Least Squares. New York: IEP - A Dun-Donnelley publisher; 1976.
45. C. Moore J. Doherty The role of the calibration process in reducing model predictive error Water Resour Res 2005
46. Moore C. The use of regularized inversion in groundwater model calibration and prediction uncertainty analysis. PhD Thesis. University of Queensland, Australia, 2005.
47. Murray Darling Basin Commission. Murray-Darling Basin Commission Groundwater Flow Modeling Guideline. Aquaterra Consulting Pty Ltd. Project 125. 2000. Downloadable from: http://www.mdbc.gov.au/ publications/pdf/model_guide.pdf
48. G. Nolet R. Montelli J. Virieuz Explicit, approximate expressions for the resolution and a posteriori covariance of massive tomographic systemes Geophys J Int 138 1999 36-44
49. Poeter EP, Hill MC. Documentation of UCODE, a computer code for universal inverse modeling. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 1998; Report 98-4080, 122p.
50. O. Portniaguine M.S. Zhdanov Focusing geophysical inversion images Geophysics 64 3 1999 874-887
51. B.S. RamaRao A.M. LaVenue G. de Marsily M.G. Marietta Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated hydraulic conductivity fields, 1, theory and computational experiments Water Resour Res 31 3 1995 475-493
52. S.D. Stearns Digital signal analysis 1975 Hayden Book Company, Inc NJ
53. STOWA. Good Modeling Practice Handbook. STOWA 1999; Report 99-05 file gmpuk.pdf. Downloable from: http://waterland.net/riza/aquest
54. A.N. Tikhonov V.Y. Arsenin Solution of ill-posed problems 1977 VH Winston and Sons Washington DC
55. M. Tonkin J. Doherty A hybrid regularised inversion methodology for highly parameterised environmental models Water Resour Res 2005
56. L.R. Townley J.L. Wilson Computationally efficient algorithms for parameter estimation and uncertainty propagation in numerical models of groundwater flow Water Resour Res 21 12 1985 1851-1860
57. D.W. Vasco Datta-Gupta Akhil Asymptotic solutions of solute transport: A formalism for tracer tomography Water Resour Res 35 1 1990 1-16
58. D.W. Vasco A. Datta-Gupta J.C.S. Long Resolution and uncertainty in hydrologic characterization Water Resour Res 33 3 1997 379-397
59. D.W. Vasco J.E. Petersen E.L. Majer Resolving seismic anisotropy: Sparse matrix methods for geophysical inverse problems Geophysics 63 3 1998 970-983
60. D.W. Vasco Estimation of flow properties using surface deformation and head data: A trajectory-based approach WRR 40 2004 W10104 10.1029/ 2004WR003272
61. A.V. Vecchia R.L. Cooley Simultaneous confidence and prediction intervals for nonlinear regression models with application to a groundwater model Water Resour Res 23 7 1987 1237-1250
62. C.R. Vogel M.E. Oman Fast total variation based reconstruction of noisy, blurred images IEEE T Image Process 7 6 1998 813-824
63. Z.S. Yao R.G. Roberts A practical regularization for seismic tomography Geophys J Int 138 1999 293-299
64. T.C.J. Yeh S.Y. Liu Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method Water Resour Res 36 8 2000 2095-2105