Subtle differences in milk: Comparison of an analytical and an affective test

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 14, Issue 5-6, 2003, Pages 515-526

  Frandsen, Lise Wolf ^a   Dijksterhuis, Garmt ^a   Brockhoff, Per ^a   Holm Nielsen, Jacob ^b   Martens, Magni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Authenticity test; Descriptive analysis; Implicit learning; Milk

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOOD ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MILK; NORMAL HUMAN; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSORY ANALYSIS; TASTE DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 1542474522     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00013-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Annett J.M. Olfactory memory: a case study in cognitive psychology Journal of Psychology 130 3 1996 309-319
2. Badings H.T. Cold-storage defects in butter and their relation to autooxidation of unsaturated fatty acids Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal-Ne 24 3-4 1970 149
3. Bassette R. Fung D.Y.C. Mantha V.R. Off-flavors in milk CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 24 1 1986 1-5
4. Berg, L. (2002). Tillit til mat i kugalskapens tid (Trust in food in the age of Mad Cow's Disease). Lysaker: SIFO.
5. Buchner A. Wippich W.. In Stadler M.A. Frensch P.A. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning. Differences and commonalities between implicit learning and implicit memory 1998 Sage Publications California
6. Degel J. Köster E.P. Odors: implicit memory and performance effects Chemical Senses 24 3 1999 317-325
7. Degel J. Piper D. Köster E.P. Implicit learning and implicit memory for odors: the influence of odor identification and retention time Chemical senses 26 3 2001 267-280
8. Eberman C. McKelvie S.J. Vividness of visual imagery and source memory for audio and text Applied Cognitive Psychology 16 1 2002 87-95
9. Engen T. Remembering odors and their names American Scientist 75 5 1987 497-503
10. Frandsen, L. W., Dijksterhuis, G., Brockhoff, B., Havemose, M., - Nielsen, J.H. (2002). Milk flavour influenced by feed and storage. Poster presented at the LMC Food Congress "Future Food", 16-17 January, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby.
11. Frøst M.B. Dijksterhuis G. Martens M. Sensory perception of fat in milk Food Quality and Preference 12 2001 327-336
12. Gaborit P. Menard A. Morgan F. Impact of ripening strains on the typical flavour of goat cheeses International Dairy Journal 11 2001 315-325
13. Halkier, B., - Holm, L. (2003). Tillid til mad-forbrug mellen-dagligdag og politisering (Trust in food-consumption between routine and politics). submitted.
14. Herz R.S. Are odors the best cue to memory? A cross-modal comparison of associative memory stimuli Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 855 1998 670-674
15. Herz R.S. Cupchick G.C. The emotional distinctiveness of odor-evoked memories Chemical Senses 20 1995 517-528
16. Hough G. Martinez E. Barbieri T. Sensory thresholds of flavor defects in reconstituted whole milk powder Journal of Dairy Science 75 9 1992 2370-2374
17. ISO-Standard-8589: Sensory analysis-general guidance for design of tests rooms (1988).
18. Köster E.P. Épreuves hédoniques. In Depledt F. Strigler F. (Eds.), Évaluation sensorielle: manuel méthodologique, 2ème éd. 1998 182-207 Lavoisier Tec - Doc Paris, London, New York
19. Köster, M. A., Prescott, J., - Köster, E. P. (2002). Incidental learning and memory for three basic tastes in food. Poster presented at the Xth Food Choice Conference, Wageningen, Holland.
20. Kunst-Wilson W.R. Zajonc R.B. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized Science 207 1980 557-558
21. Lawless H. Engen T. Associations to odors-interference, mnemonics, and verbal labelling Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Learning and Memory 3 1 1977 52-59
22. Lazarus R.S. On the primacy of cognition American Psychologist 39 1984 124-129
23. MacFie H.J. Bratchell N. Greenhoff K. Vallis L.V. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests Journal of Sensory Studies 4 1989 129-148
24. Martens, H., - Martens, M. (2001). A layman's guide to multivariate data analysis. In: Multivariate analysis of quality. Chichester, UK: John Wiley - Sons Ltd.
25. Mojet, J., - Köster, E. P. (1986). Investigation into the appreciation of three low-alcohol beers (in Dutch). Report Psychological Laboratory, Utrecht University (confidential research report).
26. Mojet J. Köster E.P. Texture and flavour memory in foods: an incidental learning experiment Appetite 38 2002 110-117
27. Palmquist D.L. Beaulieu A.D. Barbano D.M. Feed and animal factors influencing milk-fat composition Journal of Dairy Science 76 6 1993 1753-1771
28. Phillips L.G. McGiff M.L. Barbano D.M. Lawless H.T. The influence of nonfat dry milk on the sensory properties, viscosity, and color of low-fat milks Journal of Dairy Science 78 10 1995 2113-2118
29. SAS Institute SAS/STAT (R) users' guide, version 8 1999 SAS Institute Cary, NC
30. Stadler M.A. Roedieger H.L. In Stadler M.A. Frensch P.A. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning. The question of awareness in research on implicit learning 1998 Sage Publications California
31. Watanabe T. Nanez J.E. Sasaki Y. Perceptual learning without perception Nature 413 6858 2001 844-848
32. Wiking L. Bom Frøst M. Larsen L.B. Nielsen J.H. Effects of storage conditions on lipolysis, proteolysis and sensory attributes in high quality raw milk Milch wissenschaft 57 4 2002 190-194
33. Willingham D.B. Nissen M.J. Bullemer P. On the development of procedural knowledge Journal of Experimental Psychology 15 1989 6
34. Zajonc R.B. Thinking and feeling: preferences need no inferences American Psychologist 35 1980 151-175
35. ajonc R.B. On the primacy of emotion American Psychologist 39 1984 117-123
36. Zajonc R.B. Markus H. Affective and cognitive factors in preferences Journal of Consumer Research 9 1982 123-131