Advantages and limitations of static parameters of fluid loading

International Anesthesiology Clinics

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-21

  Andritsos, Michael J ^a   Park, Kyung W ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD PRESSURE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FLUID LOADING; HEART ATRIUM; HEART OUTPUT; HEART PRELOAD; HEART RIGHT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE; HEART VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION PRESSURE; REVIEW;

CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION; WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;

EID: 75449100957     PISSN: 00205907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e3181bce8d5     Document Type: Review

References (117)

1. Pinsky MR Hemodynamic evaluation and monitoring in the ICU. Chest. 2007; 132:2020-2029.
2. Pinsky MR Hemodynamic monitoring over the past 10 years. Crit Care. 2006;10:117.
3. Pinsky MR, Payen D. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care. 2005;9: 566-572.
4. Iberti TJ, Daily EK, Leibowitz AB, et al. Assessment of critical care nurses' knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. The pulmonary artery catheter study group. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:1674-1678.
5. Iberti TJ, Fischer EP, Leibowitz AB, et al. A multicenter study of physicians' knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter. Pulmonary artery catheter study group. JAMA. 1990;264:2928-2932.
6. Magder S. Invasive intravascular hemodynamic monitoring: technical issues. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23:401-414.
7. Papadakos PJ, Vender JS. Training requirements for pulmonary artery catheter utilization in adult patients. New Horiz. 1997;5:287-291.
8. Pinsky MR Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:19-22.
9. Pinsky MR Hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med. 2003;24:549-560.
10. Polanco PM, Pinsky MR Practical issues of hemodynamic monitoring at the bedside. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86:1431-1456.
11. Jacobsohn E, Chorn R, O'Connor M. The role of the vasculature in regulating venous return and cardiac output: historical and graphical approach. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44:849-867.
12. Marik PE, Baram M. Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23:383-400.
13. Beal AL, Cerra FB. Multiple organ failure syndrome in the 1990s. Systemic inflammatory response and organ dysfunction. JAMA. 1994;271:226-233.
14. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368-1377.
15. Boyd O. Optimisation of oxygenation and tissue perfusion in Surgical patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2003;19:171-181.
16. Boyd O, Bennett ED. Enhancement of perioperative tissue perfusion as a therapeutic strategy for major Surgery. New Horiz. 1996;4:453-465.
17. Boyd O, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk Surgical patients. JAMA. 1993;270:2699-2707.
18. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, et al. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk Surgical patients. Chest. 1988;94: 1176-1186.
19. Wilson J, Woods I, Fawcett J, et al. Reducing the risk of major elective Surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ. 1999;318:1099-1103.
20. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid admini stration reduces length of hospital stay after major Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002;97: 820-826.
21. Fenwick E, Wilson J, Sculpher M, et al. Pre-operative optimisation employing dopex amine or adrenaline for patients undergoing major elective Surgery: a costeffectiveness analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:599-608.
22. McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, et al. Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac Surgery. BMJ. 2004;329:258.
23. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, et al. Early goal-directed therapy after major Surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care. 2005;9:R687-R693.
24. Guyton AC. Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. Physiol Rev. 1955;35:123-129.
25. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74:123-135.
26. Guyton AC. Regulation of cardiac output. N Engl J Med. 1967;277:805-812.
27. Guyton AC, Lindsey AW, Kaufmann BN. Effect of mean circulatory filling pressure and other peripheral circulatory factors on cardiac output. Am J Physiol. 1955;180: 463-468.
28. Magder S. Point: the classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct. J Appl Physiol. 2006;101:1523-1525.
29. Grocott MP, Mythen MG, Gan TJ Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1093-1106.
30. Baek SM, Makabali GG, Bryan-Brown CW, et al. Plasma expansion in Surgical patients with high central venous pressure (CVP); the relationship of blood volume to hematocrit, CVP, pulmonary wedge pressure, and cardiorespiratory changes. Surgery. 1975;78:304-315.
31. Marik PE, Varon J. The hemodynamic derangements in sepsis: implications for treatment strategies. Chest. 1998;114:854-860.
32. Hamilton-Davies C, Mythen MG, Salmon JB, et al. Comparison of commonly used clinical indicators of hypovolaemia with gastrointestinal tonometry. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:276-281.
33. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:691-699.
34. Perel A. The value of functional hemodynamic parameters in hemodynamic monitoring of ventilated patients. Anaesthesist. 2003;52:1003-1004.
35. Thomas M, Shillingford J. The circulatory response to a standard postural change in ischaemic heart disease. Br Heart J. 1965;27:17-27.
36. Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, et al. Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002;121:1245-1252.
37. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:64-68.
38. Magder S, Bafaqeeh F. The clinical role of central venous pressure measurements. J Intensive Care Med. 2007;22:44-51.
39. Seidel H, Ball J, Dains J, et al. Heart and Blood Vessels. Mosby's Guide to Physical Examination. Saint Louis: Mosby; 1995:367-443.
40. Otto C. Echocardiographic Evaluation Of Left And Right Ventricular Systolic Function. Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000:100-131.
41. Magder S, Lagonidis D, Erice F. The use of respiratory variations in right atrial pressure to predict the cardiac output response to PEEP. J Crit Care. 2001;16: 108-114.
42. Figg KK, Nemergut EC. Error in central venous pressure measurement. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1209-1211.
43. Smith T, Grounds R, Rhodes A. Central venous pressure: uses and limitations. In: Pinsky M, Payen D, eds. Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag; 2006:99-110.
44. Barbeito A, Mark JB. Arterial and central venous pressure monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin. 2006;24:717-735.
45. Izakovic M. Central venous pressure-evaluation, interpretation, monitoring, clinical implications. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2008;109:185-187.
46. Mark JB. Getting the Most from a CVP Catheter. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2005.
47. Notarius CF, Levy RD, Tully A, et al. Cardiac versus noncardiac limits to exercise after heart transplantation. Am Heart J. 1998;135:339-348.
48. Magder S. Central venous pressure: a useful but not so simple measurement. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2224-2227.
49. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:17-60.
50. Boldt J, Lenz M, Kumle B, et al. Volume replacement strategies on intensive care units: results from a postal survey. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:147-151.
51. Mark JB. Central venous pressure monitoring: clinical insights beyond the numbers. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1991;5:163-173.
52. Jellinek H, Krafft P, Fitzgerald RD, et al. Right atrial pressure predicts hemodynamic response to apneic positive airway pressure. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:672-678.
53. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, et al. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:65-71.
54. Thomsen HS, Lokkegaard H, Munck O. Influence of normal central venous pressure on onset of function in renal allografts. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1987;21: 143-145.
55. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000-2008.
56. Wagner JG, Leatherman JW. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest. 1998;113:1048-1054.
57. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:134-138.
58. Hoffman MJ, Greenfield LJ, Sugerman HJ, et al. Unsuspected right ventricular dysfunction in shock and sepsis. Ann Surg. 1983;198:307-319.
59. Reuse C, Vincent JL, Pinsky MR Measurements of right ventricular volumes during fluid challenge. Chest. 1990;98:1450-1454.
60. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172-178.
61. Magder S. More respect for the CVP. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24:651-653.
62. Gomez CM, Palazzo MG. Pulmonary artery catheterization in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:945-956.
63. Knobel E, Akamine N, Fernandes CJ Jr, et al. Reliability of right atrial pressure monitoring to assess left ventricular preload in critically ill septic patients. Crit Care Med. 1989;17:1344-1345.
64. Rice CL, Hobelman CF, John DA, et al. Central venous pressure or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure as the determinant of fluid replacement in aortic Surgery. Surgery. 1978;84:437-440.
65. Swan HJ, GanzW, Forrester J, et al. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:447-451.
66. Pinsky MR Clinical significance of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:175-178.
67. Robin E, Costecalde M, Lebuffe G, et al. Clinical relevance of data from the pulmonary artery catheter. Crit Care. 2006;10:S3.
68. Shasby DM, Dauber IM, Pfister S, et al. Swan-Ganz catheter location and left atrial pressure determine the accuracy of the wedge pressure when positive endexpiratory pressure is used. Chest. 1981;80:666-670.
69. Hoyt JD, Leatherman JW. Interpretation of the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with large respiratory excursions in intrathoracic pressure. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:1125-1131.
70. Pinsky M, Vincent JL, De Smet JM. Estimating left ventricular filling pressure during positive end-expiratory pressure in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;143: 25-31.
71. Teboul JL, Pinsky MR, Mercat A, et al. Estimating cardiac filling pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with hyperinflation. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3631-3636.
72. Raper R, Sibbald WJ. Misled by the wedge? The Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest. 1986;89:427-434.
73. Forrester JS, Diamond G, Chatterjee K, et al. Medical therapy of acute myocardial infarction by application of hemodynamic subsets (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1976;295:1356-1362.
74. Packman MI, Rackow EC. Optimum left heart filling pressure during fluid resuscitation of patients with hypovolemic and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1983;11: 165-169.
75. Krausz MM, Perel A, Eimerl D, et al. Cardiopulmonary effects of volume loading in patients in septic shock. Ann Surg. 1977;185:429-434.
76. Bennett-Guerrero E, Kahn RA, Moskowitz DM, et al. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac Surgery. Mt Sinai J Med. 2002;69:96-100.
77. Swenson JD, Bull D, Stringham J. Subjective assessment of left ventricular preload using transesophageal echocardiography: corresponding pulmonary artery occlusion pressures. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001;15:580-583.
78. Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ. Does the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure predict left ventricular preload in critically ill patients? Crit Care Med. 1981;9:437-443.
79. Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ. The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patients. Surgery. 1981;90:61-76.
80. Diebel L, Wilson RF, Heins J, et al. End-diastolic volume versus pulmonary artery wedge pressure in evaluating cardiac preload in trauma patients. J Trauma. 1994;37: 950-955.
81. Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Tagett MG, et al. End-diastolic volume. A better indicator of preload in the critically ill. Arch Surg. 1992;127:817-821; discussion 821-822.
82. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology. 1998;89: 1313-1321.
83. Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:351-355.
84. Schneider AJ, Teule GJ, Groeneveld AB, et al. Biventricular performance during volume loading in patients with early septic shock, with emphasis on the right ventricle: a combined hemodynamic and radionuclide study. Am Heart J. 1988; 116:103-112.
85. Belloni L, Pisano A, Natale A, et al. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass Surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22:243-248.
86. Hollenberg SM, Ahrens TS, Annane D, et al. Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1928-1948.
87. Poelaert JI, Schupfer G. Hemodynamic monitoring utilizing transesophageal echocardiography: the relationships among pressure, flow, and function. Chest. 2005;127:379-390.
88. Bendjelid K, Romand J-A. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:352-360.
89. Jansen JR, Schreuder JJ, Bogaard JM, et al. Thermodilution technique for measurement of cardiac output during artificial ventilation. J Appl Physiol. 1981;51: 584-591.
90. Jansen JR, Schreuder JJ, Settels JJ, et al. An adequate strategy for the thermodilution technique in patients during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1990;16:422-425.
91. Siniorakis EE, Nikolaou NI, Sarantopoulos CD, et al. Volume loading in predominant right ventricular infarction: bedside haemodynamics using rapid response thermistors. Eur Heart J. 1994;15:1340-1347.
92. Spinale FG, Mukherjee R, Tanaka R, et al. The effects of valvular regurgitation on thermodilution ejection fraction measurements. Chest. 1992;101:723-731.
93. Pinsky MR, Desmet JM, Vincent JL. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricular function in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:681-687.
94. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al. Continuously assessed right ventricular enddiastolic volume as a marker of cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac Surgical patients. Crit Care. 2005;9:R226-R233.
95. Cheatham ML, Nelson LD, Chang MC, et al. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index as a predictor of preload status in patients on positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1801-1806.
96. Diebel LN, Myers T, Dulchavsky S. Effects of increasing airway pressure and PEEP on the assessment of cardiac preload. J Trauma. 1997;42:585-590; discussion 590-591.
97. Benchimol A, Desser KB, Hastreiter AR. Right ventricular volume in congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1975;36:67-75.
98. Davila-Roman VG, Waggoner AD, Hopkins WE, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction in low output syndrome after cardiac operations: assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:1081-1086.
99. Ferlinz J, Gorlin R, Cohn PF, et al. Right ventricular performance in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1975;52:608-615.
100. Graham TP Jr, Jarmakani JM, Atwood GF, et al. Right ventricular volume determinations in children. Normal values and observations with volume or pressure overload. Circulation. 1973;47:144-153.
101. Oe M, Gorcsan J III, Mandarino WA, et al. Automated echocardiographic measures of right ventricular area as an index of volume and end-systolic pressure-area relations to assess right ventricular function. Circulation. 1995;92:1026-1033.
102. Ota T, Fleishman CE, Strub M, et al. Real-time, three-dimensional echocardiography: feasibility of dynamic right ventricular volume measurement with saline contrast. Am Heart J. 1999;137:958-966.
103. Panidis IP, Ren JF, Kotler MN, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic estimation of right ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;2:911-918.
104. Vogel M, White PA, Redington AN. In vitro validation of right ventricular volume measurement by three dimensional echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1995;74:460-463.
105. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18: 1440-1463.
106. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of ventricles during continuous positive airway pressure breathing. J Appl Physiol. 1984;56: 619-627.
107. De Simone R, Wolf I, Mottl-Link S, et al. Intraoperative assessment of right ventricular volume and function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27:988-993.
108. Leung JM, Levine EH. Left ventricular end-systolic cavity obliteration as an estimate of intraoperative hypovolemia. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1102-1109.
109. Smith MD, MacPhail B, Harrison MR, et al. Value and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography in determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1213-1222.
110. Clements FM, Harpole DH, Quill T, et al. Estimation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by two-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography: comparison of short axis imaging and simultaneous radionuclide angiography. Br J Anaesth. 1990;64:331-336.
111. Cheung AT, Savino JS, Weiss SJ, et al. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic indexes of left ventricular preload in patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:376-387.
112. Konstadt SN, Thys D, Mindich BP, et al. Validation of quantitative intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Anesthesiology. 1986;65:418-421.
113. Hofer CK, Ganter MT, Rist A, et al. The accuracy of preload assessment by different transesophageal echocardiographic techniques in patients undergoing cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22:236-242.
114. Otterstad JE, St John Sutton M, Froland G, et al. Are changes in left ventricular volume as measured with the biplane Simpson's method predominantly related to changes in its area or long axis in the prognostic evaluation of remodelling following a myocardial infarction? Eur J Echocardiogr. 2001;2:118-125.
115. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest. 2001;119:867-873.
116. Greim CA, Roewer N, Apfel C, et al. Relation of echocardiographic preload indices to stroke volume in critically ill patients with normal and low cardiac index. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:411-416.
117. Reuter DA, Goetz AE Differentiating "volumetric preload monitoring" and assessing "fluid responsiveness". Anesth Analg. 2006;102:651-652; author reply 652.