Differentiating "volumetric preload monitoring" and assessing "fluid responsiveness" [19]

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 651-652

  Reuter, Daniel A ^a   Goetz, Alwin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD VOLUME; FLUID THERAPY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART OUTPUT; HEART PRELOAD; HUMAN; LETTER; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THERMODILUTION; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 31444432708     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000190765.48530.5C     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. Grocott MPW, Mythen MG, Gan TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1093-106.
2. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of evidence: Chest 2002;121:2000-8.
3. Cheung AT, Savino JS, Weiss SJ, et al. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic indexes of left ventricular preload in patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function. Anesthesiology 1994;81:376-87.
4. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, et al. Preload index: pulmonary artery occlusion pressure versus intrathoracic blood volume monitoring during lung transplantation. Anesth Analg 2002;95:835-43.
5. Coriat P, Vrillon M, Perel A, et al. Correlation of systolic pressure variations and echocardiographic estimates of end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery. Anesth Analg 1994;78:46-53.
6. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:984-9.
7. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, et al. Optimising fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations - a comparison to aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:124-6.
8. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variations to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced left ventricular function. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1399-404.
9. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1313-21.
10. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesth 2004;21:132-8.