Educational research impacting engineering education

European Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 291-294

  Baillie, Caroline ^a   Bernhard, Jonte ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249095285     PISSN: 03043797     EISSN: 14695898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03043790902987311     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Allie, S., et al., 2009. Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: improving student learning in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 359-367.
2. Berglund, A., et al., 2009. Learning computer science: perceptions, actions and roles. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 327-338.
3. Carstensen, A.-K. and Bernhard, J., 2009. Student learning in an electric circuit theory course: critical aspects and task design. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 393-408.
4. Collier-Reed, B.I., Case, J., and Linder, C., 2009. The experience of interacting with technological artefacts. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 295-303.
5. Dewey, J., 1983. Education as engineering. In: J.A. Boydston, ed. The middle works of John Dewey, 1899-1924. Vol. 13. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 323-328 (original work published 1922).
6. Erickson, F. and Gutierrez, K., 2002. Comment: culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31 (8), 21-24.
7. Fraser, D. and Linder, C., 2009. Teaching in higher education through the use of variation: examples from distillation, physics and process dynamics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 369-381.
8. Ingerman, Å., Berge, M., and Booth, S., 2009. Physics group work in a phenomenographic perspective: learning dynamics as the experience of variation and relevance. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 349-358.
9. Kabo, J. and Baillie, C., 2009. Seeing through the lens of social justice: a threshold for engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 317-325.
10. Land, R., Meyer, E., and Smith, J., eds., 2008. Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
11. Lo, M.L., et al., 2004. Toward a pedagogy of learning. In: F. Marton and A.B.M. Tsui, eds. Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 189-225.
12. Marton, F., 1986. Phenomenography - a research approach to investigate different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21 (3), 28-49.
13. Marton, F. and Booth, S., 1997. Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Marton, F. andTsui,A.B.M., eds., 2004. Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. McCartney, R., et al., 2009. Liminal spaces and learning computing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 383-391.
16. Meyer, J.H.F. and Land, R., eds., 2006. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: threshold concepts and trouble some knowledge. London: Routledge.
17. Mitcham, C., 1994. Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18. Ramsden, P., 1991. Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
19. Skolimowski, H., 1966. The structure of thinking in technology. Technology and Culture, 7 (3), 371-383.
20. Thuné, M. and Eckerdal,A., 2009.Variation theory applied to students'conceptions of computer programming. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 339-347.
21. Winkelman, P., 2009. Perceptions of mathematics in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34 (4), 305-316.