Influence of attachment pressure and kinematic configuration on pHRI with wearable robots

Applied Bionics and Biomechanics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 157-173

  Schiele, André ^a   van der Helm, Frans C T ^b  

^a EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ergonomics; Exoskeleton; Interaction force; Physical human robot interaction; Subjective and objective measures

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ERGONOMICS; EXOSKELETON (ROBOTICS); KINEMATICS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTS; STIFFNESS; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

INTERACTION FORCES; KINEMATIC CONFIGURATION; PASSIVE COMPENSATION; PERFORMANCE METRICS; PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS; PHYSICAL HUMANROBOT INTERACTION (PHRI); SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOMS; SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE MEASURES;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 75149141719     PISSN: 11762322     EISSN: 17542103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11762320902879961     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alami R, Albu-Schaeffer A, Bicchi A, Bischoff R, Chatila R, De Luca A, Santis AD, Giralt G, Guiochet J, Hirzinger G, et al. 2006. Safe and dependable physical human-robot interaction in anthropic domains: state of art and challenges. Presented at the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS, Beijing.
2. Bergamasco M, Allotta B, Bosio L, Ferretti L, Parrini G, Prisco M, Salsedo F, Sartini G. 1994. An arm exoskeleton system for teleoperation and virtual environments applications. Proceedings of the IEEE. Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994 12-14 May. Nice, France. Vol. 2, p. 1449-1454.
3. Carignan C, Tang J, Roderick S, Naylor M. 2007. A configuration-space approach to controlling a rehabilitation arm exoskeleton. Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, p. 179-187.
4. Colombo G, Joerg M, Diez V. 2000. Driven gait orthosis to do locomotor training of paraplegic patients. Proceedings of 22nd Annual EMBS Conference, Chicago, IL. p. 23-28.
5. Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. 2000. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Reliab Res Dev. 37(6):693-700.
6. Frisoli A, Rocchi F, Marcheschi S, Dettori A, Salsedo F, Bergamasco M. 2005. A new force-feedback arm exoskeleton for haptic interaction in virtual environments. Proceedings of 1st Joint EuroHaptics Conference and IEEE Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Pisa, Italy. p. 195-201.
7. Hart SG, Staveland LE. 1988. Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index), In: Hankock PA, Meshkati M, editors, Human mental workload. Elsevier Science Publishers BV: North Holland, p. 239-250.
8. Hidler JM, Wall AE. 2005. Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. Clin Biomech. 20:184-193.
9. Hogan N. 1985. Impedance control: an approach to manipulation, Part I, II, II. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 107:1-23.
10. Kazerooni H, Steger R. 2006. The Berkely lower extremity exoskeleton. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 128(1):14-25.
11. Neckel ND, Nichols D, Hidler JM. 2007. Joint moments exhibited by chronik stroke subjects while walking with a prescribed physiological gait pattern. Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk. p.771-775.
12. Nef T, Mihelj M, Riener R. 2007. ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy. J Med Biol Eng Comput. 45(9):887-900.
13. Pratt G, Williamson M. 1995. Series elastic actuators. Procedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburg, USA. p. 388-406.
14. Raibert MH, Craig JJ. 1981. Hybrid position/force control of manipulators. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 102:275-282.
15. Riener R, Nef T, Colombo G. 2005. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. J Med Biol Eng Comput. 43:2-10.
16. Schiele A. 2008a. An explicit model to predict and interpret constraint force creation in p-HRI with exoskeletons. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), p. 1324-1330.
17. Schiele A. 2008b. Case study: quantification of constraint displacements and interaction forces in non-ergonomic pHR interfaces. In: Pons JL, editor. Wearable robots: biomechatronic exoskeletons. John Wiley, New York, NY, USA. p. 149-154.
18. Schiele A. 2008c. Case study: the ergonomic EXARM exoskeleton. In: Pons J L, editor. Wearable robots: biomechatronic exoskeletons. John Wiley, New York, NY, USA. p. 248-255.
19. Schiele A. 2008d. Fundamentals of ergonomic exoskeleton robots [Ph.D. thesis]. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology. Available at: http://www.library.tudelft.nl
20. Schiele A, De Bartolomei M, van der Helm F. 2006. Towards intuitive control of space robots: a ground development facility with exoskeleton. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE/RSJ, Beijing, China. p. 1396-1401.
21. Schiele A, van der Helm FCT. 2006. Kinematic design to improve ergonomics inhuman machine interaction. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 14(4):456-469.
22. Tsagarakis NG, Caldwell DG. 2003. Development and control of a 'soft-actuated' exoskeleton for use in physiotherapy and training. Autonom Robots 15:21-33.
23. Zinn M, Roth B, Khatib O, Salisbury JK. 2004. New actuation approach for human-friendly robot design. Int J Robot Res. 23(4-5):379-398.
24. Zoss A, Kazerooni H. 2006. Design of electrically actuated lower extremity exoskeleton. Adv Robot. 20(9):967-988.