Design of patient-specific hip implants based on the 3D geometry of the human femur

Advances in Engineering Software

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 537-547

  Jun, Yongtae ^a   Choi, Kuiwoon ^b  

^a Sejong University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

3D geometry parameters; Patient specific implants; Plane triangles intersection; Total hip replacement (THR)

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; HIP PROSTHESES; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); JOINTS (ANATOMY); MINING;

3D GEOMETRY; 3D GEOMETRY PARAMETERS; ANATOMICAL GEOMETRY; CONTACT AREAS; FEMORAL HEADS; FEMORAL NECKS; FEMORAL SHAFT; FLARE INDEX; GEOMETRIC MISMATCH; GEOMETRY PARAMETER; HEAD OFFSET; HIP IMPLANTS; HIP JOINTS; HUMAN FEMORA; HUMAN HIP JOINT; HUMAN JOINTS; SIZE AND SHAPE; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TECHNICAL CHALLENGES; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 74849126495     PISSN: 09659978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. McCarthy J.C., Bono J.V., and O'Donnel P.J. Custom and modular components in primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344 (1997) 162-171
2. Robertson D.D., Walker P.S., Granholm J.W., Nelson P.C., Weiss P.J., Fishman E.K., et al. Design of custom hip stem prostheses using three-dimensional CT modeling. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11 5 (1987) 804-809
3. Hipp E., Rechl H., Plotz W., Reeg S., and Trager J. Current state of cementless hip prostheses. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 61 2 (1994) 103-108
4. Ruyu M., Wendong X., Dongmei W., Kerong D., and Chengtao W. Design and manufacture of custom hip prostheses based on standard X-ray films. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27 (2005) 70-74
5. Martini F., Sell S., Kremling E., and Kusswetter W. Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems. Int Orthop 20 (1996) 218-221
6. Knight J.L., and Atwater R.D. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty 7 Suppl. (1992) 403-409
7. Rorabeck C.H., Bourne R.B., Mulliken B.D., Nayak N., Laupasics A., Tugwell P., et al. The Nicolas Andry award: comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325 (1996) 330-344
8. Noble P.C., Alexander J.W., Lindahl L.J., Yew D.T., Granberry W.M., and Tullos H.S. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235 (1988) 148-165
9. Fuku H. Cementless hip prosthesis design: a basic study and analysis of the proximal femur in normal Japanese people. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 68 9 (1994) 763-773
10. Khang G., Choi K., and Kim C.-S. A study of Korean femoral geometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406 (2003) 116-122
11. Laine H.J., Pajamaki K.J., Moilanen T., and Lehto M.U. The femoral canal fill of two different cementless stem designs. The accuracy of radiographs compared to computed tomographic scanning. Int Orthop 25 4 (2001) 209-213
12. Feng Z., Ziv I., and Rho J. The accuracy of computed tomography-based linear measurements of human femora and titanium stem. Invest Radiol 31 6 (1996) 333-337
13. Hua J., and Walker P.S. Relative motion of hip stems under load. An in vitro study of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and custom asymmetrical designs. J Bone Joint Surg 76 1 (1994) 95-103
14. Sugano N., Ohzono K., Nishii T., Haraguchi K., Sakai T., and Ochi T. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 3 6 (1999) 320-324
15. Götzea C., Vieth V., Meier N., Böttner F., Steinbeck J., and Hackenberg L. CT-based accuracy of implanting custom-made endoprostheses. Clin Biomech 20 8 (2005) 856-862
16. Gottschling H., Roth M., Schweikard A., and Burgkart R. Intraoperative, fluoroscopy-based planning for complex osteotomies of the proximal femur. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 1 3 (2005) 67-73
17. Viceconti M., Testi D., Gori R., Zannoni C., Cappello A., and Lollis A.D. HIDE: a new hybrid environment for the design of custom-made hip prosthesis. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 64 2 (2001) 137-144
18. Healy W.L. Hip implant selection for total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 405 (2002) 54-64
19. Walker P.S., Blunn G.W., de Prada D., and Casas C. Design rationale and dimensional considerations for a femoral neck prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 313-319
20. Seo J.-W., and Jun Y. Extracting 3D geometry parameters of hip joints for designing a custom-made hip implant. Trans Soc CAD/CAM Eng 13 3 (2008) 200-208 Korean
21. Schneider P.J., and Eberly D.H. Geometric tools for computer graphics. Morgan Kaufmann (2003) 534-546
22. Joshia M.G., Advania S.G., Miller F., and Santare M.H. Analysis of a femoral hip prosthesis designed to reduce stress shielding. J Biomech 33 12 (2000) 1655-1662
23. Pyburna E., and Goswami T. Finite element analysis of femoral components paper III - hip joints. Mater Des 25 8 (2004) 705-713
24. Sabatini A.L., and Goswami T. Hip implants VII: finite element analysis and optimization of cross-sections. Mater Des 29 7 (2008) 1438-1446
25. Howard J.L., Hui A.J., Bourne R.B., McCalden R.W., McDonald S.J., and Rorabeck C.H. A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 19 3 (2004) 266-273
26. Hafez M.A., Chelule K.L., Seedhom B.B., and Sherman K.P. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444 (2006) 184-192