A study of Korean femoral geometry

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 406, Issue , 2003, Pages 116-122

  Khang, Gon ^a   Choi, Kuiwon ^b   Kim, Cheol Sang ^c   Yang, Jong Soo ^a   Bae, Tae Soo ^b  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^c Chonbuk National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; JAPAN; KOREA; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0037231454     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200301000-00019     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, et al: Producing and avoiding stress shielding: Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 274:79-96, 1992.
2. Callaghan JJ, Fulghum CS, Glisson RR, Stranne SK: The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses: Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:839-848, 1992.
3. Fuku H: Cementless hip prosthesis design: A basic study and analysis of the proximal femur in normal Japanese people. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 68:763-773, 1994. In Japanese.
4. Gelberman RH, Cohen MS, Shaw BA, et al: The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:1000-1007, 1986.
5. Huiskes R: The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop 261:27-38, 1990.
6. Huiskes R: Biomechanics of Artificial-Joint Fixation. In Mow VC, Hayes WC (eds). Basic Orthopedic Biomechanics. New York, Raven Press 375-442, 1991.
7. Lang P, Genant HK, Jergesen HE, Murray WR: Imaging of the hip joint: Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 274:135-153, 1992.
8. Lausten GS, Jørgensen F, Boesen J: Measurement of anteversion of the femoral neck: Ultrasound and computerised tomography compared. J Bone Joint Surg 71B:237-239, 1989.
9. Maquet PGJ: Biomechanics of the Hip. Berlin, Springer-Verlag 1-45, 1985.
10. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT: Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg 69A:1169-1176, 1987.
11. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, et al: The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop 235:148-165, 1988.
12. Noble PC, Kamaric E, Alexander JW, Tullos HS: The effect of stem shape on mechanical stability of a cementless femoral component. Trans Soc Biomater XVI:56, 1990.
13. Rubin PJ, Leyvraz PF, Aubaniac JM, et al: The morphology of the proximal femur: A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 74B:28-32, 1992.
14. Ruwe PA, Gage JR, Ozonoff MB, DeLuca PA: Clinical determination of femoral anteversion: A comparison with established techniques. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:820-830, 1992.
15. Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH: Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:849-863, 1992.
16. Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E: A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:610-614, 1998.
17. Tullos HS, McCaskill BL, Dickey R, Davidson J: Total hip arthroplasty with a low-modulus porous-coated femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg 66A:888-898, 1984.
18. Vanderby R, Manley PA, Kohles SS, Belloli DM, McBeath AA: A micromotion comparison of cemented and porous ingrowth total hip replacements in a canine model. Trans Orthop Res Soc 14:577, 1989.
19. Walker PS, Schneeweis D, Murphy S, Nelson P: Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. J Biomech 20:693-702, 1987.