Custom and modular components in primary total hip replacement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 344, Issue , 1997, Pages 162-171

  McCarthy, Joseph C ^a   Bono, James V ^a   O'Donnell, Patrice J ^a  

^a NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ACETABULUM; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORROSION; COST; FEMUR; IMPLANT; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0030722736     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199711000-00017     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bargar WL: Shape the implant to the patient. A rationale for the use of custom-fit cementless total hip implants. Clin Orthop 249:73-78, 1989.
2. Barrack RL, Burke DW, Cook SD, Skinner HB, Harris WH: Complications related to modularity of total hip components. J Bone Joint Surg 75B: 688-692, 1993.
3. Bartel DL, Bickwell VL, Wright TM: The effect of conformity, thickness and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:1041-1051, 1984.
4. Bobyn JC, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, Dujovne AR, Brooks CE: Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 298:27-36, 1994.
5. Bono JV, Sanford L, Toussaint JT: Severe polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:119-125, 1994.
6. Cameron HU: The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop 298:47-53, 1994.
7. Capello WN, Sallay PI, Feinberg JR: Omniflex modular femoral component. Two- to five-year results. Clin Orthop 298:54-59, 1994.
8. Charnley J, Halley D: Rate of wear on total hip replacements. Clin Orthop 112:170-191, 1975.
9. Chmell MJ, Rispler D, Poss R: The impact of modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 319:77-84, 1995.
10. Collier JP, Mayor MB, William IR, et al: The trade-offs associated with modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 311:91-101, 1995.
11. Cook SD, Barrack RL, Baffes GC, et al: Wear and corrosion of modular interfaces in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop 298:80-88, 1994.
12. Crowninshield RD, Johnston RC, Andrews JG, Brand RA: A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. J Biomech 11:75-85, 1978.
13. Cupic Z: Long term follow up of Charnley arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 141:28-13, 1979.
14. Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ, et al: Intergranular corrosion fatigue failure of cobalt-alloy femoral stems: A failure analysis of two implants. J Bone Joint Surg 76A:110-115, 1994.
15. Harris WH, Allen JR: The calcar replacement femoral component for total hip arthroplasty; design, uses and surgical technique. Clin Orthop 157:215-224, 1981.
16. Huk OL, Bansal M, Betts F, et al: Polyethylene and metal debris generated by non-articulating surfaces of modular acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg 76B:568-574, 1994.
17. Jasty M, Bragon CR, Lee K, Hanson A, Harris WH: Surface damage to cobalt-chrome femoral head prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 76B:73-77, 1994.
18. Kitziger KJ, DeLee JC, Evans JA: Disassembly of a modular acetabular component of a total hip replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 72A: 621-623, 1990.
19. Krushell RJ, Burke DW, Harris WH: Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty: The impact of modular head-neck components. J Arthroplasty 6:97-101, 1991.
20. Lieberman JR, Rimnac CM, Garvin KL, et al: An analysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 300:162-167, 1994.
21. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Money B: Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg 72A:518-528, 1990.
22. Mulier JC, Mulier M, Brady LPO, et al: A new system to produce intraoperatively custom femoral prosthesis from measurements taken during the surgical procedure. Clin Orthop 249: 97-112, 1989.
23. Pellicci PM, Hass SB: Disassembly of a modular femoral component during closed reduction of the dislocated femoral component: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg 72A:619-623, 1990.
24. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C: Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop 208: 108-113, 1986.
25. Rimnac CM, Klein RW, Betts F, Wright TM: Post-irradiation aging of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg 76A: 1052-1056, 1994.
26. Salvati EA, Lieberman JR, Huk OL, Evans BG: Complications of femoral and acetabular modularity. Clin Orthop 319:85-93, 1995.
27. Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH: Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg 74A: 849-863, 1992.
28. Stulberg SD, Stulberg BN, Wixson RL: The rationale, design characteristics and preliminary results of a primary custom total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop 249:79-96, 1989.
29. Tradonsky S, Postak PD, Froimson AI, Greenwald AS: A comparison of the dissociation strength of modular acetabular components. Clin Orthop 296: 154-160, 1993.
30. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Galante JO: Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 76A:1345-1359, 1994.
31. Wasielewski RC, Cooperstein LA, Kruger MP, Rubash HE: Acetabular anatomy and the transac-etabular fixation of screws in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 72A:501-508, 1990.