Finishing on time: When do predictions influence completion times?

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-32

  Buehler, Roger ^a   Peetz, Johanna ^a   Griffin, Dale ^b  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bias; Optimism; Planning fallacy; Prediction; Task completion times

Indexed keywords

EID: 74649085458     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ariely D., and Wertenbroch K. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance. Self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 219
2. Armor D.A., and Taylor S.E. The effects of mindset on behavior: Self-regulation in deliberative and implemental frames of mind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (2003) 86-95
3. Austin J.T., and Vancouver J.B. Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin 120 (1996) 338-375
4. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 191-215
5. Buehler R., and Griffin D. Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 92 (2003) 80-90
6. Buehler R., Griffin D., and MacDonald H. The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (1997) 238-247
7. Buehler R., Griffin D., and Ross M. Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (1994) 366-381
8. Buehler R., Griffin D., and Ross M. Inside the planning fallacy: The causes and consequences of optimistic time predictions. In: Gilovich T., Griffin D., and Kahneman D. (Eds). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9. Buehler R., Messervey D., and Griffin D. Collaborative planning and prediction: Does group discussion affect optimistic biases in time estimation?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97 (2005) 47-63
10. Byram S.J. Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3 (1997) 216-239
11. Carver C.S., and Scheier M.F. On the self-regulation of behavior (1998), Cambridge University Press, New York
12. Cervone D., and Peake P.K. Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1986) 492-501
13. Chandon P., Morwitz V.G., and Reinartz W.J. The short- and long-term effects of measuring intent to repurchase. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (2004) 566-572
14. Connolly T., and Dean D. Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks. Management Science 43 (1997) 1029-1045
15. Dunning D. Prediction: The inside view. In: Kruglanski A.W., and Higgins E.T. (Eds). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. 2nd ed. (2007), Guilford Press, New York 69-90
16. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance (1957), Stanford University Press, Stanford
17. Fishbach A., and Dhar R. Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. Journal of Consumer Research 32 (2005) 370-377
18. Fishbach A., Dhar R., and Zhang Y. Subgoals as substitutes or complements: The role of goal accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 232-242
19. Fishbach A., and Ferguson M.J. The goal construct in social psychology. In: Kruglanski A.W., and Higgins E.T. (Eds). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. Second edition (2007), Guilford Press, New York 490-515
20. Fitzsimons G.J., and Williams P. Asking questions can change choice behavior: Does it do so automatically or effortfully?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6 (2000) 195-206
21. Gollwitzer P.M. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist 54 (1999) 493-503
22. Greenwald A.G., Carnot C.G., Beach R., and Young B. Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (1987) 315-318
23. Hinsz V.B., Kalnbach L.R., and Lorentz N.R. Using judgemental anchors to establish challenging self-set goals without jeopardizing commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71 (1997) 287-308
24. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in Management Science 12 (1979) 313-327
25. Koehler D.J., and Poon C.S.K. Self-predictions overweight strength of current intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2006) 517-524
26. König C.J. Anchors distort estimates of expected duration. Psychological Reports 96 (2005) 253-256
27. Koole S., and Van't Spijker M. Overcoming the planning fallacy through willpower: Effects of implementation intentions on actual and predicted task-completion times. European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (2000) 873
28. Krizan Z., and Windschitl P.D. The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psychological Bulletin 133 (2007) 95-121
29. Kruger J., and Evans M. If you don't want to be late, enumerate: Unpacking reduces the planning fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 586-598
30. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108 (1990) 480-498
31. LeBoeuf R.A., and Shafir E. Anchoring on the "here" and "now" in time and distance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 35 (2009) 81-93
32. Locke E.A., and Latham G.P. A theory of goal setting and task performance (1990), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
33. Locke E.A., and Latham G.P. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 57 (2002) 705
34. Morwitz V.G., and Fitzsimons G.J. The mere-measurement effect: Why does measuring intentions change behavior?. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14 (2004) 64-74
35. Morwitz V.G., Johnson E., and Schmittlein D. Does measuring intent change behavior?. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (1993) 46-61
36. Newby-Clark I.R., Ross M., Buehler R., Koehler D.J., and Griffin D. People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6 (2000) 171-182
37. Paese P.W. Effects of framining on actual time allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 61 (1995) 67-76
38. Pezzo M.V., Litman J.A., and Pezzo S.P. On the distinction between yuppies and hippies: Individual differences in prediction biases for planning future tasks. Personality and Individual Differences 41 (2006) 1359
39. Pezzo S.P., Pezzo M.V., and Stone E.R. The social implications of planning: How public predictions bias future plans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2006) 221-227
40. Roy M.M., and Christenfeld N.J.S. Effect of task length on remembered and predicted duration. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15 (2008) 202-207
41. Roy M.M., Christenfeld N.J.S., and McKenzie C.R.M. Underestimating the duration of future events: Memory incorrectly used or memory bias?. Psychological Bulletin 131 (2005) 738-756
42. Sanna L.J., Parks C.D., Chang E.C., and Carter S.E. The hourglass is half full or half empty: Temporal framing and the group planning fallacy. Group Dynamics 9 (2005) 173-188
43. Sherman S.J. On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 211-221
44. Stajkovic A.D., and Luthans F. Self-efficacy and work-related performance. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1998) 240-261
45. Taylor S.E., Pham L.B., Rivkin I.D., and Armor D.A. Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. American Psychologist 53 (1998) 429-439
46. Thomas K.E., Newstead S.E., and Handley S.J. Exploring the time prediction process: The effects of task experience and complexity on prediction accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17 (2003) 655-673
47. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1130
48. Wood R.E., Mento A.J., and Locke E.A. Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (1987) 416-425