Adaptation of an information quality framework to measure customers' behavioral intentions to use lodging Web sites

International Journal of Hospitality Management

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 129-146

  Jeong, Miyoung ^a   Lambert, Carolyn U ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Customer information needs on the Web; Information quality; Lodging Web site; Web quality measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001136450     PISSN: 02784319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4319(00)00041-4     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams D.A., Nelson R.R., Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology. a replication MIS Quarterly. 16:1992;227-247.
2. Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. 1993;Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
3. Ajzen I., Driver B.L. Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative and control beliefs. an application of the theory of planned behavior Leisure Sciences. 13:1991;185-204.
4. Auster E., Choo C.W. Environmental scanning by CEOs in two Canadian industries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44:1993;194-203.
5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 37:1982;122-147.
6. Barsky J.D. Customer satisfaction in the hotel industry. meaning and measurement Hospitality Research Journal. 16(1):1992;51-73.
7. Beck, S., 1997. Evaluation criteria: the good, the bad & the ugly or why it's a good idea to evaluate Web resources. http://lib.nmsu.edu/staff/susabeck/evalcrit.html.
8. Bennett, L.T., Wilkinson, G.L., Oliver, K.M., 1996. The development and validation of instruments to assess the quality of Internet information. A progress Report. http://itechl.coe.uga.edu/faculty/gwilkinson/AACE96paper.html.
9. Bonn M.A., Furr H.L., Susskind A.M. Using the Internet as a pleasure travel planning tool. an examination of the sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics among Internet users and nonusers Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. 22(3):1998;303-317.
10. Cadotte E.R., Turgeon N. Key factors in guest satisfaction. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. 28(4):1988;44-51.
11. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16:1951;297-334.
12. Culnan M.J. The dimensions of perceived accessibility to information. implications for the delivery of information systems and services Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 36:1985;302-308.
13. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13:1989;319-340.
14. FIND/SVP, 1997. The 1997 American Internet user survey. Emerging Technologies Research Group. http://etrg.findsvp.com/internet/online.html.
15. Fuld L.M. Will today's databases survive? Information Today. 12:1996;21-23.
16. Grassian, E., 1998. Thinking critically about World Wide Web resources. http://www.library.ucla.edu/liberaries/college/instruct/web/critical.htm.
17. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th ed. 1995;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Harris, R., 1997. Evaluating Internet research sources. http://www.sccu.edu/faculty/RHarris/evalu8it.htm.
19. Hinchliffe, L.J. 1997. Resource selection and information evaluation. http://alexia.lis.uiuc.edu/~janicke/Evaluate.html.
20. Hoffman D.L., Novak T.P. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments. conceptual foundations Journal of Marketing. 60:1996;50-68.
21. Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D. LISREL 8, Scientific Software International, Inc. 1993;Chicago, IL.
22. Klobas J.E. Beyond information quality. fitness for purpose and electronic information resource use Journal of Information Science. 21:1995;95-114.
23. Kennedy, S.D., 1996. The Internet changes the way we live. Information Today 48-50.
24. Larcker D.F., Lessig V.P. Perceived usefulness of information. a psychometric examination Decision Science. 11:1980;121-134.
25. McPhee, L., Lieb, J., 1999. Internet users top 92 million in the US and Canada. http://www.commercenet.com/research/reports/199906.html.
26. Miller, T.E., 1996. Segmenting the Internet. American Demographics 48-52.
27. Norem, M., 1998. Evaluating Internet sites-quick guide. http://wwwnhc.nhmccd.edu/public/lrc/research/selectsources.html.
28. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory. 1978;McGraw-Hill, New York.
29. Olshavsky R.W. Perceived quality in consumer decision making. an integrated theoretical perspective Jacoby J., Olson J.C. Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise. 1985;3-29 Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
30. Peterson R.A., Balasubramanian S., Bronnenberg B.J. Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 25:1997;329-346.
31. Raman N.V. Determinants of desired exposure to interactive advertising. 1996;The University of Texas at Austin. UMI Dissertation Information Service. A Bell & Howell Company, Ann Arbor, MI.
32. Smith, A.G., 1996. Criteria for evaluation of Internet information resources. http://www.vuw.ac.nz/~agsmith/evaln/index.htm.
33. Smith A.G. Testing the surf. criteria for evaluating Internet information resources The Public-Access Computer Systems Review. 8:1997;1-15.
34. Solock, J., 1996. The Internet: window to the world or hall of mirrors? Information quality in the networked environment. http://rs.internic.net/nicsupport/nic-news/nov96/enduser.html.
35. Swanson E.B. Information System Implementation. Bridging the Gap Between Design and Utilization:1988;Irwin, Homewood, IL.
36. Swanson E.B. Measuring user attitudes in MIS research. a review OMEGA. 10:1982;157-165.
37. Tillman, H.N., 1996. Web site script evaluation methodology. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/Web/People/tilt/cgh.
38. Wada I. Research firm. online caps will backfire on carriers Travel Weekly. 41:1997;12-15.
39. White G.K., Manning B.J. Commercial WWW site appeal. How does it affect online food and drink consumers purchasing behavior? Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 8(1):1998;32-38.
40. Wilkinson, G.L., 1997. Evaluating the quality of Internet information sources. http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/Faculty/Gwilkinson/webeval.html.
41. Wilkinson G.L., Bennett L., Oliver K. Evaluation criteria and indicators of quality for Internet resources. Educational Technology. 37:1997;23-30.
42. Zmud R.W. Empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information. Decision Sciences. 9:1978;187-195.