Proteases screening for the kinetic resolution of amines with N-acyl α-amino acid trifluoromethyl esters: automated docking approach of binding energies using Subtilisin Novo as a prototype for serine proteases

Tetrahedron Asymmetry

Volumn 20, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 2823-2834

  Bottalla, Anne Lise ^a   Queyroy, Séverine ^c   Azzi Schue, Nadia ^b   Vanthuyne, Nicolas ^b   Gastaldi, Stéphane ^a   Bertrand, Michèle P ^a   Gil, Gérard ^b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c Institut de Chimie Biologique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTER DERIVATIVE; N (9 PHENYL)NONANOYL GLYCINE TRIFLUOROETHYL ESTER; N ACETYL PHENYLALANINE TRIFLUOROETHYL ESTER; N ACYL ALPHA AMINO ACID TRIFLUOROMETHYL ESTER DERIVATIVE; N OCTANOYL ALANINE TRIFLUOROETHYL ESTER; N OCTANOYL PHENYLALANINE TRIFLUOROETHYL ESTER; N PHENYL GLYCINE TRIFLUOROETHYL ESTER; SERINE PROTEINASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EID: 74349126447     PISSN: 09574166     EISSN: 1362511X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2009.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Nechab M., Azzi N., Vanthuyne N., Bertrand M.P., Gastaldi S., and Gil G. J. Org. Chem. 72 (2007) 6918
2. Nechab M., El Blidi L., Vanthuyne N., Gastaldi S., Bertrand M.P., and Gil G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 6 (2008) 3917
3. Gastaldi S., Escoubet S., Vanthuyne N., Gil G., and Bertrand M.P. Org. Lett. 9 (2007) 837
4. The spatial arrangement of the catalytic triad in the protease active site is the mirror image of that in lipases. As a consequence, their enantiopreference is opposite to that of lipases. See:. Fitzpatrick P.A., and Klibanov A.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 3166
5. Kazlauskas R.J., and Weissfloch A.N.E. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 3 (1997) 65
6. Savile C.K., and Kazlauskas R.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 2104
7. For other examples of protease-mediated amine acylation, see:. Kitagushi H., Fitzpatrick P.A., Huber J.E., and Klibanov A.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111 (1989) 3094
8. Gutman A.L., Meyer E., Kalerin E., Polyack F., and Sterling J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40 (1992) 760
9. Orsat B., Alper P.B., Moree W., Mak C.-P., and Wong C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 712
10. Wang Y.F., Yakolevsky K., and Margolin A.L. Tetrahedron Lett. 37 (1996) 5317
11. Wang Y.F., Yakolevsky K., Zhang B., and Margolin A.L. J. Org. Chem. 62 (1997) 3488
12. Takayama S., Moree W.J., and Wong C.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 37 (1996) 6287
13. Routaboul L., Vanthuyne N., Gastaldi S., Gil G., and Bertrand M.P. J. Org. Chem. 73 (2008) 364
14. El Blidi L., Nechab M., Vanthuyne N., Gastaldi S., Gil G., and Bertrand M.P. J. Org. Chem. 74 (2009) 2901-2903
15. For structural comparisons of subtilisins and some alkaline proteases, see:. McPhalen C.A., and James M.N.G. Biochemistry 27 (1988) 6582
16. Schubert Wright C.S., Alden R.A., and Kraut J.K. Nature 221 (1969) 235
17. Miyatake H.H., Hata Y., Fujii T., Hamada K., Morihara K., and Katsube Y. J. Biochem. 118 (1995) 474
18. van der Laan J.M., Teplyakov A.V., Kelders H., Kalk K.H., Misset O., Mulleners L.J.S.M., and Dijkstra B.W. Protein Eng. 5 (1992) 405
19. For a mini review, see also:. Gupta R., Beg Q.K., and Lorenz P. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 59 (2002) 15 and references cited therein
20. Rao M.B., Tanksale A.M., Ghatge M.S., and Deshpande V.V. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62 (1998) 597
21. For a general review, see:. Bordusa F. Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 4817
22. For the use of coated subtilisin in alcohol DKR, see:. Borén L., Martín-Matute B., Xu Y., Córdova A., and Bäckvall J.-E. Chem. Eur. J. 12 (2006) 225
23. Kim M.-J., Chung Y.I., Choi Y.K., Li H.K., Kim D., and Park J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 11494
24. See also:. Martinez S.G., Alvira E., Vergara Cordero L., Ferrer A., Montanés-Clemente I., and Barletta G. Biotechnol. Prog. 18 (2002) 1462
25. E-Values were calculated according to:. Chen C.-S., Fujimoto Y., Girdaukas G., and Sih C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104 (1982) 7294
26. No enantioselectivity was observed with these enzymes, even under different experimental conditions.
27. Bornscheuer, U. T.; Kazlauskas, R. J. In Hydrolases in Organic Synthesis, Regio- and Stereoselective Biotransformations, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006; Chapter 6 and references cited therein.
28. Trifluoroethanol is known as a good leaving group for enzymatic acylations, for a general review on acyl donors, see:. Hanefeld U. Org. Biomol. Chem. 1 (2003) 2405 and relevant references cited therein
29. Schechter I., and Berger A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 27 (1967) 157
30. Graham L.D., Haggett K.D., Jennings P.A., Le Brocque D.S., Whittaker R.G., and Schober P.A. Biochemistry 32 (1993) 6250
31. The use of N-protected amino acid carbamoylesters as acyl donors was also shown to accelerate the rate the α-CT-catalyzed amidation of chiral amines. See:. Miyazawa T., Yabuuchi N., Yanagihara R., and Yamada T. Biotechnol. Lett. 21 (1999) 725
32. For another application of the concept of substrate mimetics, see:. Günther R., Elsner C., Schmidt S., Hofmann H.-J., and Bordusa F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2 (2004) 1442
33. For each acyl donor conversion was monitored by GC and HPLC. No significant incidence of conversion rate on the calculated E-value was noticed.
34. With donor 3a, 5% conversion was detected in 2 h (14% in 5 h) for the non catalyzed reaction performed in 3-methyl-3-pentanol at 21 °C at 0.5 M concentration. With donor 3d, under the same experimental conditions 2% conversion was registered in 2 h (4% in 5 h). With donor 3f, the conversion was 2% in 2 h (15% in 5 h).
35. Wells J.A., Cunningham B.C., Graycar T.P., and Estell D.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84 (1987) 5167
36. Estell D.A., Graycar T.P., Miller J.V., Powers D.B., Wells J.A., Burnier J.P., and Ng P.G. Science 233 (1986) 659
37. 3 for the S1 and P1 side chains was deduced from the reactivity of subtilisin mutants, see:. Perona J.J., and Craik C.S. Protein Sci. 4 (1995) 337
38. For a complementary study, see:. Grøn H., Medal M., and Breddam K. Biochemistry 31 (1992) 6011
39. Bech L.M., Sørensen S.B., and Breddam K. Eur. J. Biochem. 209 (1992) 869
40. Only the natural (S)-enantiomer substrate was recognized by the enzyme. The resolution performed over 90 min with 2 equiv of racemic acyl donor, instead of 1 equiv (cf. Table 2, entry 8), led to the following results: amine ee (50.1%); 2f de (97.0%), C (34.1%), E (102). The ee of the remaining donor was 22.8%.
41. 2 failed due to the importance of non-catalyzed reaction.
42. Morris G.M., Goodsell D.S., Halliday R.S., Huey R., Hart W.E., Belew R.K., and Olson A.J. J. Comput. Chem. 19 (1998) 1639
43. For theoretical approach to reorganization and preorganization in enzymes active sites, see:. Smith A.T.J., Müller R., Toscano M.D., Kast P., Hellinga H.W., Hilvert D., and Houk K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 15361
44. Veld M.A.J., Fransson L., Palmans A.R.A., Meijer E.W., and Hult K. ChemBioChem 10 (2009) 1330
45. Davis I.W., Leaver-Fay A., Chen V.B., Block J.N., Kapral G.J., Wang X., Murray L.W., Snoeyink III W.B.A., Richardson J.S., and Richardson D.C. Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (2007) W375
46. See: the website at http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker.
47. Wang J., Cieplak P., and Kollman P.A. J. Comput. Chem. 21 (2000) 1049
48. Moyna G., Williams H.J., Nachman R.J., and Scott A.I. Biopolymers 49 (1999) 403
49. Huey R., Morris G.M., Olson A.J., and Goodsell D.S. J. Comput. Chem. 28 (2007) 1145
50. Gasteiger J., and Marsili M. Tetrahedron 36 (1980) 3219
51. ampac 8, 1992-2004 Semichem, Inc. PO Box 1649, Shawnee, ks 66222.