3D versus 2D dynamic 82Rb myocardial blood flow imaging in a canine model of stunned and infarcted myocardium

Nuclear Medicine Communications

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 75-81

  Lekx, Katie S ^a   Dekemp, Robert A ^c   Beanlands, Rob S B ^c   Wisenberg, Gerald ^b   Wells, Glenn ^a   Stodilka, Robert Z ^a   Lortie, Mireille ^c   Klein, Ran ^c   Zabel, Pamela ^a   Kovacs, Michael S ^a   Sykes, Jane ^a   Prato, Frank S ^a  

^a LAWSON HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canine model; Myocardial blood flow; Rubidium perfusion; Three dimensional positron emission tomography; Two dimensional positron emission tomography

Indexed keywords

RUBIDIUM 82;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DOG; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART STRESS; HYPEREMIA; NONHUMAN; STUNNED HEART MUSCLE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANIMALS; CORONARY CIRCULATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOGS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL STUNNING; REST; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 74349120385     PISSN: 01433636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328332b359     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Heart and Stroke Just the Facts, 2002/2003 edition. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. 2006.
2. Von Schulthess GK. Positron emission tomography versus positron emission tomography/computed tomography: from unclear to new-clear medicine. Mol Imaging Biol 2004; 6:183-187.
3. Von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF. Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology 2006; 238:405-422.
4. Schwaiger M, Ziegler S, Nekolla SG. PET/CT: challenge for nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Med 2005; 46:1664-1678.
5. Alvarez-Diez TM, dekemp R, Beanlands RSB, Vincent J. Manufacture of strontium-82/rubidium-82 generators and quality control of rubidium-82 chloride for myocardial perfusion imaging in patients using positron emission tomography. Appl Radiat Isot 1999; 50:1015-1023.
6. Machac J. Cardiac positron emission tomography imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2005; 35:17-36.
7. Epstein J, Benelfassi A, Beanlands RSB, deKemp RA. An 82Rb infusion system for quantitative perfusion imaging with 3D PET. Appl Radiat Isot 2004; 60:921-927.
8. Dekemp RA, Ruddy TD, Hewitt T, Dalipaj MM, Beanlands RS. Detection of serial changes in absolute myocardial perfusion with 82Rb PET. J Nucl Med 2000; 41:1426-1435.
9. Parkash R, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD, Kitsikis A, Hart R, Beauchesne L, et al.. Potential utility of rubidium-82 PET quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2004; 11:440-449.
10. Yoshida K, Mullani N, Gould KL. Coronary flow and flow reserve by PET simplified for clinical applications using rubidium-82 or nitrogen-13- ammonia. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:1701-1712.
11. Lin JW, Sciacca RR, Chou RL, Laine AF, Bergmann SR. Quantification of myocardial perfusion in human subjects using 82Rb and wavelet-based noise reduction. J Nucl Med 2001; 42:201-208.
12. El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Guerin B, Kijewski MF, Di Carli MF, Moore SC. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses. J Nucl Med 2005; 46:1264-1271.
13. Camici PG, Rimoldi OE. Myocardial blood flow in patients with hibernating myocardium. Cardiovasc Res 2003; 57:302-311.
14. Dayanikli F, Grambow D, Muzik O, Mosca L, Rubenfire M, Schwaiger M. Early detection of abnormal coronary flow reserve in asymptomatic men at high risk for coronary artery disease using positron emission tomography. Circulation 1994; 90:808-817.
15. Geltman EM, Henes CG, Senneff MJ, Sobel BE, Bergmann SR. Increased myocardial perfusion at rest and diminished perfusion reserve in patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16:586-595.
16. Votaw JR,White M. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies. J Nucl Med 2001; 42:701-706.
17. Lewellen TK, Kohlmyer SG, Miyaoka RS, Kaplan MS. Investigation of the performance of the General Electric Advance positron emission tomograph in 3-D mode. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1996; 43:2199-2206.
18. Knesaurek K, Machac J, Krynyckyi BR, Almeida OD. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET imaging. J Nucl Med 2003; 44:1350-1356.
19. Dekemp RA, Yoshinaga K, Beanlands RSB. Will 3-dimensional PET-CT enable the routine quantification of myocardial blood flow? J Nucl Cardiol 2007; 14:380-397.
20. Knesaurek K, Machac J, Kim JH. Comparison of 2D, 3D high dose and 3D low dose gated myocardial 82Rb PET imaging. BMC Nucl Med 2007; 7:4.
21. Knesaurek K, Machac J, Zhang Z. Repeatability of regional myocardial blood flow calculation in Rb-82 PET imaging. BMC Nucl Med 2009; 9:2.
22. Thornhill RE, Prato FS, Pereira RS, Wisenberg G, Sykes J. Examining a canine model of stunned myocardium with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45:864-871.
23. Pereira RS, Prato FS, Wisenberg G, Sykes J. The determination of myocardial viability using Gd-DTPA in a canine model of acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:684-693.
24. Pereira RS, Prato FS, Lekx KS, Sykes J, Wisenberg G. Contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of myocardial viability after permanent coronary artery occlusion. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44:309-316.
25. Dourado PM, Tsutsui JM, Mathias WJr, Andrade JL, Da Luz PL, Chagas AC. Evaluation of stunned and infarcted canine myocardium by real time myocardial contrast echocardiography. Braz J Med Biol Res 2003; 36:1501-1509.
26. Juergens KU, Reimer P, Weber TP, Tombach B, Bremer C, Renger B, et al.. Cine and tagged magnetic resonance imaging in short-term stunned versus necrotic myocardium. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005; 21:271-282.
27. Klein R, Adler A, Beanlands RS, deKemp RA. Precision-controlled elution of a 82Sr/82Rb generator for cardiac perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52:659-673.
28. Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1994; 13:601-609.
29. Liu X, Comtat C, Michel C, Kinahan P, Defrise M, Townsend D. Comparison of 3-D reconstruction with 3D-OSEM and with FORE +OSEM for PET. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20:804-814.
30. Dekemp RA, Nahmias C. Automated determination of the left ventricular long axis in cardiac positron tomography. Physiol Meas 1996; 17:95-108.
31. Lortie M, Beanlands RS, Yoshinaga K, Klein R, Dasilva JN, Dekemp RA. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with Rubidium-82 dynamic PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34:1765-1774. (Pubitemid 47599057)
32. Golanowski L, deKemp RA, Beanlands RS, Ruddy TD. Variance and covariance of 82Rb kinetic model parameters: computer simulations and dynamic PET studies. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference 2000; 2:23-28.
33. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al.. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105:539-542.
34. Fritz-Hansen T, Hove JD, Kofoed KF, Kelbaek H, Larsson HBW. Quantification of MRI measured myocardial perfusion reserve in healthy humans: a comparison with positron emission tomography. JMRI 2008; 27:818-824.
35. Sawada S, Muzik O, Beanlands RSB,Wolfe E, Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M. Interobserver and interstudy variability of myocardial blood flow and flowreserve measurements with nitrogen 13 ammonia-labeled positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 1995; 2:413-422.
36. Khorsand A, Graf S, Pirich C, Muzik O, Kletter K, Dudczak R, et al.. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging: comparison of 2 tracer kinetic models. J Nucl Cardiol 2005; 12:410-417.