The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 463, Issue , 2007, Pages 58-62

  Jenny, Jean Yves ^a   Ciobanu, Eugen ^a   Boeri, Cyril ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKIN INCISION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 35348911529     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c077     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1968;(Suppl 277):7-72.
2. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Adams JB, Groseth KL. Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:60-66.
3. Buechel FF. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:40-50.
4. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:618-626.
5. Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ. The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:29-34.
6. Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:77-81.
7. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:282-288.
8. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies BL, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:49-56.
9. Epinette JA, Edidin AA. Hydroxyapatite-coated unicompartmental knee replacement. A report of five to six years' follow-up of the HA Unix tibial component. In: Cartier P, Epinette JA, Deschamps G, Hernigou P, eds. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Paris, France: Expansion Scientifique Française; 1997:243-259.
10. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12.
11. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:68-73.
12. Hamilton WG, Collier MB, Tarabee E, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Engh GA. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:98-107.
13. Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:161-165.
14. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709-714.
15. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6:217-220.
16. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:40-45.
17. Larsson SE, Larsson S, Lundkvist S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:174-181.
18. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A, Pittors K, Davis J, Shim JC, Pavlov H, Petersen M. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:74-81.
19. Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, Kircher J, Refior HJ, Jansson V. Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:296-301.
20. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Luring C, Grifka J. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system. Int Orthop. 2004;28:193-197.
21. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CAF, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:970-976.
22. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:168-173.
23. Reilly KA, Beard DJ, Barker KL, Dodd CA, Price AJ, Murray DW. Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A randomised controlled trial. Knee. 2005;12:351-357.
24. Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:351-355.
25. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:503-513.
26. Romanowski MR, Repicci JA. Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:17-22.
27. Ryd L, Lindtsrand A, Stentstrom A, Selvik G. Porous coated anatomic tricompartmental tibial components. The relationship between position and micromotion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;251:189-197.
28. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Mise en place des prothèses totales du genou assistée par ordinateur: comparaison avec la technique conventionnelle. Rev Chir Orthop. 2001;87:18-28.
29. Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;248:61-77.
30. Seon JK, Song EK. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:777-782.
31. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830-835.
32. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:180-186.
33. Tria AJ Jr. Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2003;26:s859-s863.
34. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:131-139.