The effect of presentation paradigm on syntactic Processing: An event-related fMRI study

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 65-79

  Lee, Donghoon ^a   Newman, Sharlene D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related fMRI; RSVP; Sentence comprehension; Syntactic complexity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAPID SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE NET; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; READING; SEMANTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74049140020     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20845     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Beccue B, Vila J (2004): Assessing the impact of rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A reading technique Adv Distributed Syst. vol. 3061, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 42-53.
2. Bornkessel I, Zysset S, Friederici AD, von Cramon Y, Schlesewsky M (2005): Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage 26:221-233.
3. Brett M, Anton JL, Valabregue R, Poline JB (2002): Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox (Abstract). Presented at the 8th International Conferance on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Sendai, Japan.
4. Caplan D (2001): Functional neuroimaging studies of syntactic processing. J Psycholing Res 30:297-320.
5. Caplan D, Waters GS (1999): Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behav Brain Sci 22:77-94; discussion 95-126.
6. Caplan D, Alpert N, Waters G (1998): Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. J Cogn Neurosci 10:541-552.
7. Caplan D, Alpert N, Waters G (1999): PET studies of syntactic processing with auditory sentence presentation. Neuroimage 9:343-351.
8. Caplan D, Vijayan S, Kuperberg G, West C, Waters G, Greve D, Dale AM (2002): Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event-related fMRI study of relative clauses. Hum Brain Mapp 15:26-38.
9. Caplan D, Chen E, Waters G (2008): Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing. Cortex 44:257-275.
10. Carpenter PA, Just MA, Keller TA, Eddy WF, Thulborn KR (1999): Time course of fMRI-activation in language and spatial networks during sentence comprehension. Neuroimage 10:216-224.
11. Chien Y-H, Chen C-H (2007): The use of dynamic display to improve reading comprehension for the small screen of a wrist watch. In: Human Interface and the Management of Information. Methods, Techniques and Tools in Information Design. vol. 4557, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, pp 814-823.
12. Constable RT, Pugh KR, Berroya E, Mencl WE, Westerveld M, Ni W, Shankweiler D (2004): Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 22:11-21.
13. Cooke A, Zurif EB, DeVita C, Alsop D, Koenig P, Detre J, Gee J, Pinango M, Balogh J, Grossman M (2002): Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short-term memory components. Hum Brain Mapp 15:80-94.
14. Cooke A, Grossman M, DeVita C, Gonzalez-Atavales J, Moore P, Chen W, Gee J, Detre J (2006): Large-scale neural network for sentence processing. Brain and Language 96:14-36.
15. Cutting LE, Clements AM, Courtney S, Rimrodt SL, Schafer JGB, Bisesi J, Pekar JJ, Pugh KR (2006): Differential components of sentence comprehension: Beyond single word reading and memory. NeuroImage 29:429-438.
16. Davachi L, Wagner AD (2002): Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: Insights from relational and item-based learning. J Neurophysiol 88:982-990.
17. Ditman T, Holcomb PJ, Kuperberg GR (2007): An investigation of concurrent ERP and self-paced reading methodologies. Psychophysiology 44:927-935.
18. Eichenbaum H (2004): Hippocampus: Cognitive processes and neural representations that underlie declarative memory. Neuron 44:109-120.
19. Fedorenko E, Gibson E, Rohde D (2006): The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources. J Mem Lang 54:541-553.
20. Fiebach CJ, Schlesewsky M, Friederici AD (2001): Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. J Psycholinguist Res 30:321-338.
21. Fiebach CJ, Schlesewsky M, Bornkessel I, Friederici AD (2004): Distinct neural correlates of legal and illegal word order variations in German: How can fMRI inform cognitive models of sentence processing. In: Carreiras V, Clifton C Jr, editors. The On-Line Study of Sentence Comprehension. New York: Psychology Press. pp 357-370.
22. Fiebach CJ, Schlesewsky M, Lohmann G, von Cramon DY, Friederici AD (2005): Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory. Hum Brain Mapp 24:79-91.
23. Forster KI (1970): Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception Psychophys 8:215-221.
24. Forster KI, Olbrei I (1972): Semantic heuristics and syntactic analysis. Cognition 2:319-347.
25. French P (1981): Semantic and syntactic factors in the perception of rapidly presented sentences. J Psycholing Res 10:581-591.
26. Friederici AD, Fiebach CJ, Schlesewsky M, Bornkessel ID, von Cramon DY (2006): Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 16:1709-1717.
27. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Turner R, Frackowiak RS (1995): Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI. Neuroimage 2:157-165.
28. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, Worsley KJ (1999): Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage 10:385-396.
29. Friston KJ, Penny WD, Glaser DE (2005): Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage 25:661-667.
30. Goldstein M, O ̈ quist G, Björk S (2003):Evaluating sonified rapid serial visual presentation: An immersive reading experience on a mobile device. In: Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience. vol. 2615, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, pp 508-523.
31. Grewe T, Bornkessel I, Zysset S, Wiese R, von Cramon DY, Schlesewsky M (2005): The emergence of the unmarked: A new perspective on the language-specific function of Broca's area. Hum Brain Mapp 26:178-190.
32. Grodzinsky Y, Friederici AD (2006): Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:240-246.
33. Grossman M, Koenig P, DeVita C, Glosser G, Alsop D, Detre J, Gee J (2002): Neural representation of verb meaning: An fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 15:124-134.
34. Hagoort P, Brown CM (2000): ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuro-psychologia 38:1531-1549.
35. Hart J, Kraut M (2007): Neural Basis of Semantic Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Hashimoto R, Sakai KL (2002): Specialization in the left prefrontal cortex for sentence comprehension. Neuron 35:589-597.
37. He S, Cohen ER, Hu X (1998): Close correlation between activity in brain area MT/V5 and the perception of a visual motion aftereffect. Curr Biol 8:1215-1218.
38. Holmes VM, Forster KI (1972): Perceptual complexity and underlying sentence structure. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 11:148-156.
39. Juola JF, Ward NJ, McNamara T (1982): Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words, and text. J Exp Psychol Gen 111:208-227.
40. Just MA, Carpenter PA, Woolley JD (1982): Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. J Exp Psychol Gen 111:228-238.
41. Just MA, Carpenter PA, Keller TA (1996a): The capacity theory of comprehension: new frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychol Rev 103:773-780.
42. Just MA, Carpenter PA, Keller TA, Eddy WF, Thulborn KR (1996b): Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 274:114-116.
43. Kable JW, Kan IP, Wilson A, Thompson-Schill SL, Chatterjee A (2005): Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 17:1855-1870.
44. Keller TA, Carpenter PA, Just MA (2001): The neural bases of sentence comprehension: A fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cereb Cortex 11:223-237.
45. Kiehl KA, Laurens KR, Liddle PF (2002): Reading anomalous sentences: An event-related fMRI study of semantic processing. NeuroImage 17:842-850.
46. Kieras DE, Just MA (1984): New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
47. King JW, Kutas M (1995): Who did what and when? Using wordand clause-level erps to monitor working memory usage in reading. J Cogn Neurosci 7:376-395.
48. Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1984): Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307:161-163.
49. Lin Y-C, Shieh K-K (2006): Reading a dynamic presentation of Chinese text on a single-line display. Displays 27:145-152.
50. MacDonald MC, Just MA, Carpenter PA (1992): Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cogn Psychol 24:56-98.
51. McGaugh JL (2000): Memory-A century of consolidation. Science 287:248-251.
52. Michael EB, Keller TA, Carpenter PA, JustMA (2001): fMRI investigation of sentence comprehension by eye and by ear: Modality fingerprints on cognitive processes. Hum Brain Mapp 13:239-252.
53. Muter P (1996): Interface design and optimization of reading of continuous text. In: van Oostendorp H, de Mul A, editors. Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. pp 161-180.
54. Neville H, Nicol JL, Barss A, Forster KI, Garrett MF (1991): Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 3:151-165.
55. Newman SD, Just MA, Keller TA, Roth J, Carpenter PA (2003): Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca's area. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16:297-307.
56. Newman SD, Lee D, Ratliff KL: Off-line sentence processing: What is involved in answering a comprehension probe? Hum Brain Mapp (in press).
57. Nichols T, Brett M, Andersson J, Wager T, Poline J-B (2005): Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. NeuroImage 25:653-660.
58. Postle BR, Zarahn E, D'Esposito M (2000): Using event-related fMRI to assess delay-period activity during performance of spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks. Brain Res Protocols 5:57-66.
59. Potter MC (1984): Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In: Kieras DE, Just MA, editors. New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. pp 91-118.
60. Potter MC, Kroll JF, Harris C (1980): Comprehension and memory in rapid sequential reading. In: Nickerson R, editor. Attention and Performance, Vol. VIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp 395-418.
61. Rayner K (1998): Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124:372-422.
62. Reppas JB, Usrey WM, Reid RC (2002): Saccadic eye movements modulate visual responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Neuron 35:961-974.
63. Rubin GS, Turano K (1992): Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 32:895-902.
64. Rusell MC, Chaparro BS (2001): Exploring effects of speed and font size with RSVP. Paper Presented at Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
65. Squire LR, Alvarez P (1995): Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: A neurobiological perspective. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:169-177.
66. Stowe LA, Paans AMJ, Wijers AA, Zwarts F (2004): Activations of "motor" and other non-language structures during sentence comprehension. Brain Lang 89:290-299.
67. Thilo KV, Santoro L, Walsh V, Blakemore C (2004): The site of saccadic suppression. Nat Neurosci 7:13-14.
68. Tulving E, Markowitsch HJ (1998): Episodic and declarative memory: Role of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 8:198-204.
69. Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Herv PY, Duffau H, Crivello F, Houd O, Mazoyer B, Tzourio-Mazoyer N (2006): Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. NeuroImage 30:1414-1432.
70. Ward NJ, Juola JF (1982): Reading with and without eye movements: Reply to Just, Carpenter, and Woolley. J Exp Psychol Gen 111:239-241.
71. Waters GS, Caplan D (1996): The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just and Carpenter (1992): Psychol Rev 103:761-772.
72. Zarahn E (2000): Testing for neural responses during temporal components of trials with BOLD fMRI. NeuroImage 11:783-796.
73. Zarahn E, Aguirre G, D'Esposito M (1997): A trial-based experimental design for fMRI. NeuroImage 6:122-138.