Assessing the impact of rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A reading technique

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3061, Issue , 2004, Pages 42-53

  Beccue, Barbara ^a   Vila, Joaquin ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; RAPID SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATIONS; READING SPEED; READING TECHNIQUES; WORLD WIDE WEBS (WWW);

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 35048873225     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25958-9_5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Taylor, I. and Taylor M. M. (1983). The Psychology of Reading. Academic Press Inc., 111 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003.
2. Forster, K. I. (1970). Visual Perception of Rapidly Presented Word Sequences of Varying Complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 215-221.
3. Kolers, P.A. & Katzman, M.T. (1966). Naming Sequentially Presented Letters and Words. Language & Speech, 9, 84-95.
4. Aaronson, D. and Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Performance Theories for Sentence Coding: Some Quantitative Models. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 16, 277-303.
5. Juola, J. F., Ward, N. J. and McNamara, T.(1982). Visual Search and Reading of Rapid Serial Presentations Of Letter Strings, Words, And Text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 208-227.
6. Masson, M. E. J. (1983). Conceptual Processing of Text During Skimming And Rapid Sequential Reading. Memory and Cognition, 11, 262-274.
7. Potter, M. C. (1984). Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP): A Method for Studying Language Processing. In Kieras D. E. and Just M. A. (eds), New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research, (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 91-118.
8. Cocklin, T.G., Ward, N.J., Chen, H.C. and Juola, J.F. (1984). Factors Influencing Readability Of Rapid Presented Text Segments. Memory & Cognition, 12(5), 431-442.
9. Muter, P., Kruk, R.S., Buttigieg, M.A. and Kang, T.J. (1988). Reader Controlled Computerized Presentation of Text. Human Factors, 30, 473-486.
10. Kang, T.J. and Muter, P. (1989). Reading Dynamically Displayed Text. Behaviour & Information Technology, 8(1), 33-42.
11. Fine, E.M. and Peli, E. (1995). Scrolled And Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Texts Are Read At Similar Rates By The Visually Impaired. Journal of Optical Society of America, 12(10), 2286-2292.
12. Rahman, T. and Muter, P. (1999). Designing an Interface to Optimize Reading with Small Display Widows. Human Factors, 1(1), 106-117. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13. Castelhano, M.S. and Muter P. (2001). Optimizing the Reading Of Electronic Text Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(4), 237-247.
14. Öquist, G. (2001). Adaptive Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. Master's Thesis. Language Engineering Programme, Department of Linguistics, Uppsala University.
15. Gibson, E. J. & Levin, H. (1975). The Psychology of Reading. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Galitz, W.O. (1997). The Essential Guide to User Interface Design. John Wiley & Sons, 605 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10158-0012.
17. Vila, J., Beccue, B., & Dharmik, A. (2001). A Workbench for Investigating an Alternative Reading Technique. Proceedings of WebNet 2001 - World Conference on the WWW and Internet, Orlando, Florida. 1295-1299.
18. International Standards Organization (1989). Computer Display Color. Draft Standard Document 9241-8, ISO, Geneva.