Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 199-201

  King Sears, Margaret ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73949092884     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/27740372     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, §2, 104 Stat. 328 (1991).
2. Center for Universal Design. (1997). Environments and products for all people. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, Center for Universal Design. Retrieved July 27, 2009, from http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about-us/ usronmace.htm
3. Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., Sanford, J., Steinfeld, E., Story, M., & Vanderheiden, G. (1997). Principles of universal design. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, Center for Universal Design. Retrieved July 27, 2009, from http://www.design. ncsu.edu/cud/about-ud/udprinciples.htm
4. Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. Psychological Record, 54, 207-231.
5. Ebbers, S. M., & Denton, C. A. (2008). A root awakening: Vocabulary instruction for older students with reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 90-102.
6. Jitendra, A. K., Deatline-Buchman, A., & Sczesniak, E. (2005). A comparative analysis of third-grade mathematics textbooks before and after the 2000 NCTM standards. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(2), 47-62.
7. Jitendra, A. K., Nolet, V., Xin, Y. P., Gomez, O., Iskold, L., Renouf, K., & DaCosta, J. (2001). An analysis of middle school geography textbooks: Implications for students with learning problems. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 17, 151-174.
8. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105-118.
9. King-Sears, M. E. (2001). Three steps for gaining access to general education curriculum for learners with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37, 67-76.
10. Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved November 14, 1999, from http://www.cec.sped.org/ericec.htm
11. Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal design for individual differences. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 39-43.
12. Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2009). Adolescents with learning disabilities as writers: Are we selling them short? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 81-92.
13. Suh, J. M., & Moyer, P. S. (2008). Scaffolding special needs students' learning of fraction equivalence using virtual manipulatives. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Morelia, Mexico.
14. van Garderen, D. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 496-506.
15. Zascavage, V., & Winterman, K. G. (2009). What middle school educators should know about assistive technology and universal design for learning. Middle School Journal, 46-52.