Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration

Technovation

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 100-108

  Bjerregaard, Toke ^a  

^a AARHUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Institutional logics; New institutionalism; R D collaboration; University industry collaboration

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROJECTS; CULTURAL DIFFERENCE; DENMARK; JOINT PROJECTS; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; LITTLE RESEARCH; NORMATIVE CONFLICT; PROJECT CONTROL; PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES; QUALITATIVE STUDY; SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE; SOCIAL SKILLS; STRATEGIC RESEARCH; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 73749088103     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., Di Costa F., and Solazzi M. University-industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination. Technovation 29 6-7 (2009) 498-507
2. Benner M., and Sandstöm U. Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy 29 (2002) 291-301
3. Bercovitz J., and Feldman M. Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science 19 1 (2008) 69-89
4. Bloedon R., and Stokes D. Making university/industry collaborative research succeed. Research Technology Management 37 2 (1994) 44-48
5. Blumenthal D., Campbell E., Anderson M., Causino N., and Louis K. Withholding research results in academic lifescience: evidence from a national survey of faculty. Journal of the American Medical Association 277 15 (1996) 1224-1228
6. Boardman P.C., and Ponomariov B.L. University researchers collaborating with private companies. Technovation 29 (2009) 142-153
7. Bourdieu P. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 14 6 (1975) 19-47
8. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York
9. Bourdieu P. The Logic of Practice (1990), Polity Press, Cambridge
10. Bourdieu P. Science of Science and Reflexivity (2004), Polity Press, Cambridge
11. Bouty I. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal 43 1 (2000) 50-65
12. Boxenbaum E., and Battilana J. Importation as innovation: transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization 3 (2005) 355-383
13. Brinberg D., and McGrath J.E. Validity and the Research Process (1985), Sage, Beverly Hills, London
14. Burnham J. Evaluating industry-university research linkages. Research Technology Management 40 1 (1997) 52-55
15. Campbell D.F.J., and Guttel W.H. Knowledge production of firms: research networks and the "scientification" of business R&D. International Journal of Technology Management 31 1/2 (2005) 152-175
16. Campbell E.G., Clarridge B.R., Gokhale M., Birenbaum L., Hilgartner S., Holtzman N.A., et al. Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. The Journal of the American Medical Association 287 (2002) 473-480
17. Carayannis E.G., and Alexander J. Winning by co-opeting in strategic government-university-industry R&D partnerships: the power of complex, dynamic knowledge networks. Journal of Technology Transfer 24 2-3 (1999) 197-210
18. Carayannis E.G., and Campbell D.F.J. 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management 46 3-4 (2009) 201-234
19. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis (2006), Sage Publications Ltd
20. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quaterly 35 (1990) 128-152
21. Colyvas J.A., and Powell W.W. Roads to institutionalization: the remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Research in Organizational Behavior 27 (2006) 305-353
22. Colyvas J.A., and Powell W.W. From vulnerable to venerated: the institutionalization of academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 25 (2007) 219-259
23. Cooney K. Fields, organizations, and agency: toward a multilevel theory of institutionalization in action. Administration & Society 39 687 (2007) 687-718
24. Currie W.L., and Guah M.W. Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare. Journal of Information Technology 22 (2007) 235-247
25. Cyert R.M., and Goodman P.S. Creating effective university-industry alliances: an organizational learning perspective. Organizational Dynamics Spring (1997) 45-57
26. Czarniawska B., and Genell K. Gone shopping? Universities on their way to the market. Scandinavian Journal of Management 18 (2002) 455-474
27. D'Aunno T., Sutton R.I., and Price R.R. Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: a study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal 34 3 (1991) 636-661
28. Davenport S., Davies J., and Grimes C. Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference. Technovation 19 (1999) 31-40
29. DiMaggio P.J., and Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 2 (1983) 147-160
30. Dodgson M. The strategic management of R&D collaboration. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 4 3 (1992) 227-244
31. Ernø-Kjølhede E. Managing Collaborative Research. Unveiling the Microdynamics of the European Triple Helix (2001), Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen
32. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy 27 2 (1998) 109-123
33. Etzkowitz H. Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information 42 3 (2003) 293-337
34. Etzkowitz H. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation (2008), Routledge, New York, NY
35. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., and Cantisano Terra B.R. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29 (2000) 313-330
36. In: Etzkowitz H., Webster A., and Healey P. (Eds). Capitalizing Knowledge. New Intersections of Industry and Academia (1998), State University of New York Press, New York
37. Fine G.A. Negotiated orders and organizational cultures. Annual Review of Sociology 10 (1984) 239-262
38. Fligstein N. Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist 40 (1997) 4
39. Fontana R., Geuna A., and Matt M. Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: the importance of searching and signalling. Research Policy 35 (2005) 309-323
40. Friedland R., and Alford R.R. Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: Powell W.W., and DiMaggio P.J. (Eds). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 232-263
41. Gassol J.H. The effect of university culture and stakeholders' perceptions on university-business linking activities. Journal of Technology Transfer 32 (2007) 489-507
42. Geisler E., and Rubenstein A.H. University-industry relations: a review of major issues. In: Link A.N., and Tassey G. (Eds). Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry, University, Government Relationship (1989), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA 43-62
43. Gibbons M. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (1994), SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CA
44. Godin B. Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy 25 4 (1996) 587-606
45. Gunasekara C. Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 1 (2006) 101-113
46. Hall B.H., Link A.N., and Scott J.T. Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 1-2 (2001) 87-98
47. Hargrave T.J., and Van de Ven A.H. Institutional work as the creative embrace of contradiction. In: Lawrence T.B., Leca B., and Suddaby R. (Eds). Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (2009), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 120-140
48. Hicks D.M. Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change 4 2 (1995) 401-424
49. Jacob M., Lundqvist M., and Hellsmark H. Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy 32 9 (2003) 1555-1568
50. Jain S., George G., and Maltarich M. Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy 38 6 (2009) 922-935
51. Jarzabkowski, P., Matthiesen, J., Van de Ven, A.,.2008. A Process Model of Coping with Dialectical Tensions in Organizations. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
52. Jarzabkowski P., Matthiesen J., and Van de Ven A. Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In: Lawrence T.B., Suddaby R., and Leca B. (Eds). Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organization (2009), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 284-316
53. Johnson W.H.A. Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: the case of Precarn. Technovation 28 (2008) 495-505
54. Kleinman D.L. Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce (2003), The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
55. Kleinman, D.L., Habinek, J., Vallas, S., 2009. Codes of commerce: continuity and change in the culture of American academia. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting.
56. Kleinman D.L., and Vallas S.P. Contradiction in convergence: universities and industry in the biotechnology field. In: Frickel S., and Moore K. (Eds). The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. (2006), The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison 35-62
57. Krais B. The academic disciplines: social field and culture. Comparative Social Research Supplement 2 (1996) 93-111
58. Kreiner K., and Schultz M. Informal collaboration in R&D: the formation of networks across organizations. Organization Studies 14 2 (1993) 189-209
59. Kraatz M.S., and Block E.S. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In: Greenwood R., Oliver C., Suddaby R., and Sahlin-Anderson K. (Eds). Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2008), Sage, London 243-275
60. Leca B., Battilana J., and Boxenbaum E. How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals 3 1 (2009) 65-107
61. Lee Y.S. Technology transfer' and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 25 6 (1996) 843-863
62. Liyanage S., and Mitchell H. Strategic management of interactions at the academic-industry interface. Technovation 14 10 (1994) 641-655
63. López-Martínez R.E., Medellín E., Scanlon A.P., and Solleiro J.L. Motivations and obstacles to university industry cooperation (UIC): a Mexican case. R&D Management 24 1 (1994) 17-30
64. Lounsbury M. A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalization of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal 5 (2007) 289-307
65. Marquis C., and Lounsbury M. Vive la résistance: competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Academy of Management Journal 50 4 (2007) 799-820
66. Mauss, M., 1923-1924. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques.
67. Maxwell J.A. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. second ed. (2005), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
68. Merton R.K. Science and democratic social structure. In: Merton R.K. (Ed). Social Theory and Social Structure (1942/1959), The Free Press, Glencoe 550-561
69. Mitroff I. Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: a case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review 39 4 (1974) 579-595
70. Murovec N., and Prodan I. Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation 29 12 (2009) 859-872
71. Nee V., and Ingram P. Embeddedness and beyond: institutions, exchange and social structure. In: Brinton M.C., and Nee V. (Eds). The New Institutionalism in Sociology (2001), Stanford University Press, Stanford (Calif.) 19-45
72. Orton J.D. From inductive to iterative grounded theory: zipping the gap between process theory and process data. Scandinavian Journal of Management 13 4 (1997) 419-438
73. Owen-Smith J. From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities. Research Policy 32 (2003) 1081-1104
74. Owen-Smith J., and Powell W.W. Careers and contradictions: faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. In: Vallas S.P. (Ed). The Transformation of Work (2001) 109-140
75. Perkmann M., and Walsh K. University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9 4 (2007) 259-280
76. Polanyi M. The republic of science. Minerva 1 (1962) 54-73
77. Powell W.W. The new institutionalism. In: Clegg S.R., and Bailey J.R. (Eds). The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies (2007), Sage Publishers, London
78. Powell W.W., and Owen-Smith J. Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 2 (1998) 253-277
79. Reay T., and Hinings C.R. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies 30 6 (2009) 629-652
80. Ringer F.K. Fields of Knowledge: French Academic Culture in Comparative Perspective (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York 1890-1920
81. Scott W.R., and Christensen S. The institutional construction of organizations: international and longitudinal studies (1995), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif
82. Scott W.R., and Davis G.F. Organizations and organizing: rational, natural, and open systems perspectives. first ed. (2007), Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J
83. Seo M., and Creed W. Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review 27 (2002) 222-247
84. Sewell W.H.J. A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98 1 (1992) 1-29
85. Siegel D.S., Waldman D.A., Atwater L.E., and Link A.N. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 14 1 (2003) 111-133
86. Slaughter S., and Leslie L.L. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University (1997), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
87. Stokes D.E. Pasteur's Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation (1997), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
88. Strauss A.L. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. first ed. (1978), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
89. Suddaby R. What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal 49 4 (2006) 633-642
90. Suddaby R., and Greenwood R. Researching institutions and institutional change. In: Buchanan D., and Bryman A. (Eds). Handbook of Organizational Research Methods London (2009), Sage 176-195
91. Thornton P. Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decision Making in Higher Education Publishing (2004), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (Cal.)
92. Thornton P.H., and Ocasio W. Institutional logics. In: Greenwood R., Oliver C., Suddaby R., and Anderson K.-S. (Eds). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2008), Sage Ltd., London 99-129
93. Turpin T. Managing the boundaries of collaborative research: a contribution from cultural theory. International Journal of Technology Management 18 3-4 (1999) 232-245
94. Tuunainen J. Contesting a hybrid firm at a traditional university. Social Studies of Science 35 2 (2005) 173-210
95. Tödtling F., Lehner P., and Kaufmann A. Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions?. Technovation 29 (2009) 59-71
96. Vallas S.P., and Kleinman D.L. Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: the confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology. Socio-Economic Review (2007) 1-29
97. Webster A., and Etzkowitz H. Towards a theoretical analysis of academic-industry collaboration. In: Etzkowitz H., Webster A., and Healey P. (Eds). Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia (1998), State University of New York Press, Albany (N.Y.) 47-72
98. Ziman J. "Post-academic science": constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies 9 (1996) 1
99. Zucker L.G., and Darby M.R. Individual actions and the demands for institutions: star scientists and institutional transformation. American Behavioral Scientist 40 4 (1997) 502-513