Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: The case of Precarn

Technovation

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 495-505

  Johnson, William H A ^a  

^a Universidade de Bentley   (United States)

Author keywords

Case study; Triple helix R D; University industry government collaboration

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INNOVATION; METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; TECHNOLOGY;

CASE STUDIES; ELSEVIER (CO); INCENTIVE MECHANISMS; INNOVATION NETWORKS; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; TECHNOLOGICAL ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT (TD); TRIPLE HELIXES;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 45649084307     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anonymous. EUREKA!. Technology Review 91 6 (1988) 26-33
2. Baranano A.M. The Spanish innovative firm and the ESPRIT, RACE and EUREKA programmes: an organizational approach. Technovation 15 6 (1995) 339-350
3. Barney J. Firm resources and competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 1 (1991) 99-120
4. Benner M., and Sandstrom U. Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 291
5. Brown Jr. G.E., and O'Brien T.C. University-industry links: government as blacksmith. Technovation 1 2 (1981) 85
6. Browning L.D., Beyer J.M., and Shetler J.C. Building cooperation in a competitive industry: SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry. Academy of Management Journal 38 1 (1995) 113-151
7. Castro E.A.D., Rodrigues C., Esteves C., and Pires A.d.R. The triple helix model as a motor for the creative use of telematics. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 193
8. Coase R.H. The nature of the firm. Economica 4 (1937) 386-405
9. Collinson, S., Gregson, G., 2001. Knowledge networks for new technology-based firms: an international comparison of local entrepreneurship promotion. In: The Paper Presented at the R&D Management Conference in Dublin, Ireland, September, 2001.
10. Cooper R.G. Product Leadership: Pathways to Profitable Innovation (2005), Perseus Books, New York, NY
11. Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., and Kleinschmidt E.J. New product portfolio management: practices and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 4 (1999) 333-351
12. Corsten H. Problems with cooperation between universities and enterprises-a comparative study on size of enterprise. Technovation 6 4 (1987) 295
13. Dalziel, M., 2005. 4th Pillar Organizations in Canada. A Report to the Prime Minister's Advisory Council on Science and Technology. Government of Canada, September 15, 2005.
14. Davenport S., Davies J., and Grimes C. Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference. Technovation 19 1 (1999) 31
15. Davenport S., Grimes C., and Davies J. Collaboration and organizational learning: a study of a New Zealand collaborative research program. International Journal of Technology Management 18 3/4 (1999) 173-187
16. Dodgson M. Technological Collaboration in Industry: Strategy, Policy and Internationalization in Innovation (1993), Routledge, New York
17. Eisenhardt K.M., and Graebner M.E. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50 1 (2007) 25-32
18. Etzkowitz H., and Klofsten M. The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management 35 3 (2005) 243
19. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 109
20. Ferlie E., Fitzgerald L., Wood M., and Hawkins C. The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal 48 1 (2005) 117-134
21. Fujisue K. Promotion of academia-industry cooperation in Japan-establishing the "law of promoting technology transfer from university to industry" in Japan. Technovation 18 6,7 (1998) 371-381
22. Fusfeld H.I., and Haklisch C.S. Collaborative industrial research in the US. Technovation 5 4 (1987) 305
23. Gassmann O., and von Zedtwitz M. Organization of industrial R&D on a global scale. R&D Management 28 3 (1998) 147-161
24. Gerybadze A., and Reger G. Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy 28 2,3 (1999) 251-274
25. Granstrand O., Patel P., and Pavitt K. Multi-technology corporations: Why they have "distributed" rather than "distinctive core" competencies?. California Management Review 39 4 (1997) 8-25
26. Hagedoorn J., Link A.N., and Vonortas N.S. Research partnerships. Research Policy 29 4,5 (2000) 567-586
27. Hemphill T.A., and Vonortas N.S. Strategic research partnerships: a managerial perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 2 (2003) 255-271
28. Hladik K.J. R&D and international joint ventures. In: Contractor F.J., and Lorange P. (Eds). Cooperative Strategies in International Business (1988), Lexington Books, Lexington, MA 187-203
29. Industry Canada, 2000. Industry Canada: Making a Difference, Our Priorities for 2000-2001. Cat. No. C1-12/2001E-I, Government of Canada Publication.
30. Kaukonen E., and Nieminen M. Modeling the triple helix from a small country perspective: the case of Finland. Journal of Technology Transfer 24 2-3 (1999) 173
31. Kogut B. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science 37 1 (1991) 19-33
32. Kreiner K., and Schultz M. Informal collaboration in R&D. The formation of networks across organizations. Organization Studies 14 2 (1993) 189-209
33. Leitch C.M., and Harrison R.T. Maximising the potential of university spin-outs: the development of second-order commercialisation activities. R&D Management 35 3 (2005) 257
34. Leydesdorff L. The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 243
35. Li Y.T., and Blais R.A. The innovation galore, from classroom to the shop floor. Technovation 1 4 (1982) 255
36. Metcalfe J.S. Restless capitalism, experimental economies. In: During W., Oakey R., and Kipling M. (Eds). New Technology-based Firms at the Turn of the Century (2000), Pergamon, Oxford 4-15
37. Meyer M. Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management 33 2 (2003) 107
38. Millar J., Demaid A., and Quintas P. Trans-organizational innovation: a framework for research. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 9 4 (1997) 399-418
39. Mustar P. Partnerships, configurations and dynamics in the creation and development of SMEs by researchers. Industry and Higher Education August (1998) 217-221
40. Pfeffer J., and Salancik G. The External Control of Organizations (1978), Pitman, Boston, MA
41. Powell W.W., Koput K.W., and Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 1 (1996) 116-145
42. Quintas P., and Guy K. Collaborative, pre-competitive R&D and the firm. Research Policy 24 3 (1995) 325-348
43. Robertson M., Swan J., and Newell S. The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. Journal of Management Studies 33 3 (1996) 333-359
44. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovation. fourth ed (1995), The Free Press, New York, NY
45. Saad M. Issues and challenges arising from the application of innovation strategies based on the triple helix culture. Experience of the incubation system in Algeria. The International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development 3 1 (2004) 17
46. Sakakibara M. Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?. Research Policy 26 4/5 (1997) 447-473
47. Schartinger D., Schibany A., and Gassler H. Interactive relations between universities and firms: empirical evidence for Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 3 (2001) 255-268
48. Schoening N.C., Souder W.E., Lee J., and Cooper R. The influence of government science and technology policies on new product development in the USA, UK, South Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Management 15 8 (1998) 821-835
49. Siggelkow N. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal 50 1 (2007) 20-24
50. Wen J., and Kobayashi S. Exploring collaborative R&D network: some new evidence in Japan. Research Policy 30 8 (2001) 1309-1319
51. Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (1984) 171-180
52. Williamson O. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975), Basic Books, New York, NY
53. Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985), Free Press, New York, NY
54. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1989), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA