Implicit conscientiousness predicts academic performance

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 452-457

  Vianello, Michelangelo ^a   Robusto, Egidio ^a   Anselmi, Pasquale ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Academic performance; Explicit conscientiousness; Faking; Gender differences; IAT; Implicit conscientiousness

Indexed keywords

EID: 73749083747     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aiken L.S., and West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions (1991), Sage, Newbury Park
2. Bar-Anan Y., Nosek B.A., and Vianello M. The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology 56 (2009) 329-343
3. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1173-1182
4. Barrick M.R., and Mount M.K. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 44 (1991) 1-26
5. Blair I. The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6 (2002) 242-261
6. Boldero J.M., Rawlings D., and Haslam N. Convergence between GNAT-assessed implicit and explicit personality. European Journal of Personality 3 (2007) 341-358
7. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-FFI. Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae - deutsche Fassung [Neo Five Factor Inventory acc. to Costa and McCrae - German version]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
8. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Borgogni, L. (1994). BFO, big five observer. Manuale. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
9. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Borgogni, L. (2000). BFQ, big five questionnaire. Manuale (2nd ed.). Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
10. Chamorro-Premuzic T., and Furnham A. A possible model for understanding the personality-intelligence interface. British Journal of Psychology 95 (2004) 249-264
11. Di Fabio A., and Busoni L. Fluid intelligence, personality traits and scholastic success: Empirical evidence in a sample of Italian high school students. Personality and Individual Differences 43 (2007) 2095-2104
12. Do Yeong K. Voluntary controllability of the implicit association test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly 66 (2003) 83
13. Fiedler K., and Blümke M. Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the implicit association tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 27 (2005) 307-316
14. Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R., Rudman L.A., Farnham S.D., Nosek B.A., and Mellott D.S. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review 109 (2002) 3-25
15. Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., and Schwartz J.L.K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 1464-1480
16. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., and Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 197-216
17. Greenwald A.G., Poehlman T.A., Uhlmann E., and Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 (2009) 17-41
18. Grumm M., and von Collani G. Measuring big-five personality dimensions with the implicit association test - Implicit personality traits or self-esteem?. Personality and Individual Differences 43 8 (2007) 2205-2217
19. Higgins D.M., Peterson J.B., Pihl R.O., and Lee A.G.M. Prefrontal cognitive ability, intelligence, big five personality, and the prediction of advanced academic and workplace performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (2007) 298-319
20. Holden R.R. Underestimating the effects of faking on the validity of self-report personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences 44 (2008) 311-321
21. Kiefer A.K., and Sekaquaptewa D. Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes. A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science 18 (2007) 13-18
22. Komar S., Brown D.J., Komar J.A., and Robie C. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008) 140-154
23. Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the implicit association test: IV: Procedures and validity. In B. Wittenbrink, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 59-102). New York: Guilford Press.
24. Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., and Greenwald A.G. Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 44-59
25. Nosek B.A., Smyth F.L., Sriram N., Lindner N.M., Devos T., Ayala A., et al. National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (2009) 10593-10597
26. Payne B.K., Cheng C.M., Govorun O., and Stewart B.D. An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (2005) 277-293
27. Robusto E., Cristante F., and Vianello M. Assessing the impact of replication on implicit association test effects by means of the extended logistic model for the assessment of change. Behavior Research Methods 40 (2008) 954-960
28. Schmidt F.L., and Hunter J.E. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124 (1998) 262-274
29. Schmidt F.L., and Hunter J.E. General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 (2004) 162-173
30. Schmitt D.P., Realo A., Voracek M., and Allik J. Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (2008) 168-182
31. Schnabel K., Asendorpf J.B., and Greenwald A.G. Understanding and using the implicit association test: V. measuring semantic aspects of trait self-concepts. European Journal of Personality 22 (2008) 695-706
32. Steffens M.C. Is the implicit association test immune to faking?. Experimental Psychology 51 (2004) 165-179
33. Steffens M.C., and Schulze König S. Predicting spontaneous big five behavior with implicit association tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 22 (2006) 13-20
34. Weathington B.L., and Moldenhauer H.A. Gender role and personality as predictors of peer and self leadership evaluations. E-Journal of Applied Psychology 4 1 (2008) 7-14