The power and effects of entrepreneurship research

Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 131-149

  Connelly, Brian L ^a   Ireland, R D ^b   Reutzel, Christopher R ^c   Coombs, Joseph E ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73649146184     PISSN: 10422587     EISSN: 15406520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00316.x     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Aguinis H. Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management 1995, 21:1141-1158.
2. Aguinis H, Beaty JC, Boik RJ, Pierce CA. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:94-107.
3. Alvarez SA, Barney JB. Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing 2004, 19:621-635.
4. Baroudi J, Orlikowski W. The problem of statistical power in MIS research. MIS Quarterly 1989, 13:87-106.
5. Borkowski S, Welsh MJ, Zhang Q. An analysis of statistical power in behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting 2001, 13:63-84.
6. Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1964, 26(2):211-246.
7. Boyd BK, Dess GG, Rasheed AMA. Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Review 1993, 18:204-226.
8. Boyd B, Gove S, Hitt MA. Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: The case of Amihud and Lev. Strategic Management Journal 2005a, 26:367.
9. Boyd B, Gove S, Hitt MA. Construct measurement in strategic management research: Illusion or reality? Strategic Management Journal 2005b, 26:239-257.
10. Breaugh JA. Effect size estimation: Factors to consider and mistakes to avoid. Journal of Management 2003, 29:79-97.
11. Brewer JK. On the power of statistical tests in the American Educational Research Journal. American Educational Research Journal 1972, 9:391-401.
12. Brock J. The power of international business research. Journal of International Business Studies 2003, 34:90-99.
13. Bruyat C, Julien PA. Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 16:165-180.
14. Busenitz LW, West GP, Shepherd D, Nelson T, Chandler GN, Zacharakis A. Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management 2003, 29:285-308.
15. Cashen LH, Geiger SW. Statistical power and the testing of null hypotheses: A review of contemporary management research and recommendations for future studies. Organizational Research Methods 2004, 7(2):151-167.
16. Chandler GN, Lyon DW. Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2001, 2(4):101.
17. Chase LJ, Chase RB. A statistical power analysis of applied psychological research. Journal of Applied Psychology 1976, 61:234-237.
18. Chase LJ, Tucker RK. A power-analytic examination of contemporary communication research. Speech Monographs 1975, 42(3):29-41.
19. Choi YR, Shepherd DA. Entrepreneurs' decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of Management 2004, 30:377-395.
20. Chowdhury S. Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important? Journal of Business Venturing 2005, 20:727-746.
21. Clark-Carter D. An account of statistical power in research published in the British Journal of Psychology. British Journal of Psychology 1997, 88:71-83.
22. Cohen J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1962, 65(3):145-153.
23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, New York, Academic Press
24. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112(1):155-159.
25. Combs JG, Ketchen DJ. Why do firms use franchising as an entrepreneurial strategy? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management 2003, 29:443-465.
26. Daily CM, Certo ST, Dalton DR, Roengpitya R. IPO underpricing: A metaanalysis and research synthesis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2003, 27:271-296.
27. Daily CM, McDougall PP, Covin JG, Dalton DR. Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management 2002, 28:387-412.
28. Davidsson P. Researching entrepreneurship 2005, New York, Springer
29. Davidsson P, Wiklund J. Level of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2001, 25(4):81-99.
30. Deeds DL, DeCarolis D, Coombs JE. The impact of timing and firm capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Business Venturing 1997, 12:31-46.
31. Dess GG, Ireland RD, Zahra SA, Floyd SW, Janney JJ, Lane PJ. Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management 2003, 29:351-378.
32. Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ. When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal 2005, 26:947-966.
33. Eden D. Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ's editorial publication policy. Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45:841-846.
34. Egghe L, Rousseau R. An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics 2006, 69:121-129.
35. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 2007, 39:175-191.
36. Ferguson TD, Ketchen DJ. Organizational configurations and performance: The role of statistical power in extant research. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20:385-395.
37. Fichman M. Variance explained: Why size does not (always) matter. Research in Organizational Behavior 1999, 21:295-331.
38. Fischer HM, Pollock TG. Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal 2004, 47:463-481.
39. Florin J, Lubatkin M, Schulze W. A social capital model of high growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal 2003, 46:374-384.
40. Gartner WB. What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing 1990, 5:15-28.
41. George G, Wiklund J, Zahra SA. Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management 2005, 31:210-233.
42. Gilbert BA, McDougall PP, Audretsch DB. New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management 2006, 32:926-950.
43. Harris MJ. Significance tests are not enough: The role of effect-size estimation in theory corroboration. Theory and Psychology 1991, 1:375-382.
44. Harrison RT, Leitch CM. Discipline emergence in entrepreneurship: Accumulative fragmentalism or paradigmatic science? Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Change 1996, 5(2):65-83.
45. Henson RK. Effect-size measures and meta-analytic thinking in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist 2006, 34:601-629.
46. Hitt MA, Boyd BK, Li D, Ketchen D, Bergh D. The state of strategic management research and a vision of the future. Research methodology in strategy and management 2004, 1-31. In, Eds., Vol. 1, pp., New York, Elsevier
47. Howard GS, Maxwell SE, Fleming KJ. The proof of the pudding: An illustration of the relative strengths of null hypothesis, meta-analysis, and Bayesian analysis. Psychological Methods 2000, 5:315-332.
48. Hsu DH. Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Science 2006, 52:204-219.
49. Ireland RD. Random thoughts about interesting entrepreneurship research 2007, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the United States Association of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Orlando, FL
50. Ireland RD, Covin JG, Kuratko DF. Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2009, 33:19-46.
51. Ireland RD, Reutzel CR, Webb JW. Entrepreneurship research in AMJ: What has been published, and what might the future hold? Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48:556.
52. Ireland RD, Webb JW. A cross-disciplinary exploration of entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management 2007, 33:891-927.
53. Katzer J, Sodt J. An analysis of the use of statistical testing in communication research. Journal of Communication 1973, 23:251-265.
54. Keh HT, Foo MD, Lim BC. Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2002, 27(2):125-148.
55. Kier FJ, Thompson B. Effect size measures: What they are and how to compute them. Advances in social science methodology 1999, 87-100. In, Ed., pp., New York, JAI Press
56. Kline RB. Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research 2004, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association
57. Krueger N. The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1993, 18(1):5.
58. Lindsay RM. Incorporating statistical power into the test of significance procedure: A methodological and empirical inquiry. Behavioral Research in Accounting 1993, 5:211-236.
59. Low MB, MacMillan IC. Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management 1988, 14:139-162.
60. Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF. Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management 2006, 32:646-672.
61. Lyles MA, Saxton T, Watson K. Venture survival in a transitional economy. Journal of Management 2004, 30:351-375.
62. Lyon DW, Lumpkin GT, Dess GG. Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal of Management 2000, 26:1055-1085.
63. Martell RF, Lane DM, Emrich C. Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist 1996, 51:157-158.
64. Maxwell S. The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods 2004, 9:147-163.
65. Mazen AM, Graf L, Kellogg C, Hemmasi M. Statistical power in contemporary management research. Academy of Management Journal 1987, 30:369-380.
66. Mazen AM, Hemmasi M, Lewis MF. Assessment of statistical power in contemporary strategy research. Strategic Management Journal 1987, 8:403-410.
67. Miller D, Droge C, Vickery S. Celebrating the " essential": The impact of performance on the functional favoritism of CEOs in two contexts. Journal of Management 1997, 23:147-168.
68. Mone MA, Mueller GC, Mauland W. The perceptions and usage of statistical power in applied psychology and management research. Personnel Psychology 1996, 49:103-120.
69. Murphy KR, Myors B. Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests 2004, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
70. Orme JG, Combs-Orme TD. Statistical power and Type II errors in social work research. Social Work Research and Abstracts 1986, Fall:3-10.
71. Phan PH. Dynamism as a necessary property of entrepreneurial systems. Journal of Business Venturing 2006, 21:149-151.
72. Rogoff EG, Heck RKZ. Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18:559-567.
73. Rossi JS. Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years? Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology 1990, 58:646-656.
74. Sarasvathy SD. The questions we ask and the questions we care about: Reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing 2004, 19:707-720.
75. Sawyer A, Ball D. Statistical power and effect size in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18:275-290.
76. Scandura TA, Williams EA. Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal 2000, 43:1248-1264.
77. Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal 2003, 46:179-194.
78. Sedlmeier P, Gigerenzer G. Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin 1989, 105:309-316.
79. Sexton DL, Smilor RW. The art and science 1985, Cambridge, MA, Ballinger
80. Shane S, Cable D. Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science 2002, 48:364-381.
81. Shane S, Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 2000, 25:217-226.
82. Sharma P, Chrisman JJ. Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1999, 23(3):11-28.
83. Shaver KG, Scott LR. Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1991, 16(2):23-45.
84. Shortell SM, Zajac EJ. Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Academy of Management Journal 1990, 33:817-832.
85. Somech A. The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management 2006, 32:132-157.
86. Spreitzer E, Chase LJ. Statistical power in sociological research: An examination of data-analytic strategies. 1974, Unpublished research note, Bowling Green State University
87. Tahai A, Meyer MJ. A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influence. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20:279-296.
88. Tan J. Venturing in turbulent water: A historical perspective of economic reform and entrepreneurial transformation. Journal of Business Venturing 2005, 20:689-704.
89. Thompson B. Statistical," " practical," and " clinical": How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider? Journal of Counseling and Development 2002, 80:64-71.
90. Thompson B, Green J, Camili G, Elmore PB. Research synthesis: Effect sizes. Complementary methods for research in education 2005, 583-603. In, Eds., pp., Washington, DC, American Educational Research Association
91. Thompson B. Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach 2006, New York, The Guilford Press
92. Trusty J, Thompson B, Petrocelli JV. Practical guide to implementing the requirement of reporting effect size in quantitative research in the Journal of Counseling and Development. Journal of Counseling and Development 2004, 82:107-110.
93. Venkataraman S, Katz JA. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth 1997, 119-138. In, Ed., pp., Greenwich, CT, JAI Press
94. Verma R, Goodale J. Statistical power in operations management research. Journal of Operations Management 1995, 13:139-152.
95. Walster GW, Cleary TA, Borgatta EF, Bohrnstedt GW. Statistical significance as a decision rule. Sociological methodology 1970, 246-254. In, Eds., pp., San Francisco, Jossey-Bass
96. Ward RM. Highly significant findings in psychology: A power and effect size survey. 2002, Doctoral dissertation, University of Rhode Island
97. Wiklund J, Shepherd D. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing 2005, 20:71-91.
98. Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, El-Hagrassey GM. Competitive analysis and new venture performance: Understanding the impact of strategic uncertainty and venture origin. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2002, 27(1):1-28.