Phylogeography of the rufous-naped wren (Campylorhynchus Rufinucha): Speciation and hybridization in Mesoamerica

Auk

Volumn 126, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 765-778

  Vázquez Miranda, Hernán ^a   Navarro Sigüenza, Adolfo G ^b   Omland, Kevin E ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Campylorhynchus rufinucha; Central America; Hybridization; Mesoamerica; Mexico; Phylogeography; Rufous naped Wren; Species limits

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PASSERINE; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

CHIAPAS; COLIMA; COSTA RICA; ISTHMUS OF TEHUANTEPEC; MESOAMERICA; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; VERACRUZ;

CAMPYLORHYNCHUS RUFINUCHA;

EID: 73449105089     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/auk.2009.07048     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1998. Check-list of North American Birds, 7th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
2. ARBOGAST, B. S., S. V. DROVETSKI, R. L. CURRY, P. T. BOAG, G. SEU- TIN, P. R. GRANT, B. R. GRANT, AND D. J. ANDERSON. 2006. The origin and diversification of Galapagos mockingbirds. Evolution 60: 370-382.
3. BANDELT, H.-J., P. FORSTER, AND A. RÖHL. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 37-48.
4. BARKER, F. K. 1999. The evolution of cooperative breeding in Campy-lorhynchus wrens: A comparative approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
5. BARKER, F. K. 2007. Avifaunal interchange across the Panamanian Isthmus: Insights from Campylorhynchus wrens. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90: 687-702.
6. BARRIER, E., L. VELASQUILLO, M. CHAVEZ, AND R. GAULON. 1998. Neotectonic evolution of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (southeastern Mexico). Tectonophysics 287: 77-96.
7. BECERRA, J. X. 2005. Timing the origin and expansion of the Mexican tropical dry forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 10919-10923.
8. BROOKS, T. M., M. I. BAKARR, T. BOUCHER, G. A. B. DA FONSECA, C. HILTON-TAYLOR, J. M. HOEKSTRA, T. MORITZ, S. OLIVIERI, J. PARRISH, R. L. PRESSEY, AND OTHERS. 2004. Coverage provided by the global protected-area system: Is it enough? BioScience 54: 1081-1091.
9. BRUMFIELD, R. T. 2005. Mitochondrial variation in Bolivian populations of the Variable Antshrike (Thamnophilus caerulescens). Auk 122: 414-432.
10. CAMPBELL, J. A. 1999. Distribution patterns of amphibians in Middle America. Pages 111-210 in Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: A Global Perspective (W. E. Duellman, Ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
11. CASTOE, T. A., P. T. CHIPPINDALE, J. A. CAMPBELL, L. K. AMMER- MAN, AND C. L. PARKINSON. 2003. Molecular systematics of the Middle American jumping pitvipers (genus Atropoides) and phy-logeography of the Atropoides nummifer complex. Herpetologica 59: 420-431.
12. CHALLENGER, A. 1998. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México. Pasado, presente y futuro. CONABIO, IBUNAM and Agrupación Sierra Madre, Mexico.
13. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1998. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: A conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. Pages 57-75 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.
14. DIARIO OFICIAL DE LA FEDERACIÓN. 2001. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2001, que determina las especies y subespecies de flora y fauna silvestres terrestres y acuÁticas en peligro de extinción, amenazadas, raras y sujetas a protección especial, y que establece especificaciones para su protección. México D.F., Mexico.
15. DICKINSON, E. C., ED. 2003. The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World, 3rd ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
16. EXCOFFIER, L., G. LAVAL, AND S. SCHNEIDER. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47-50.
17. EXCOFFIER, L., P. E. SMOUSE, AND J. M. QUATTRO. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
18. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368-376.
19. FERRUSQUÍA-VILLAFRANCA, I. 1993. Geology of Mexico: A synopsis. Pages 3-108 in Mexican Biological Diversity: Origins and Distribution (T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa, Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
20. FLEISCHER, R. C., C. E. MCINTOSH, AND C. L. TARR. 1998. Evolution on a volcanic conveyor belt: Using phylogeographic reconstructions and K-Ar-based ages of the Hawaiian Islands to estimate molecular evolutionary rates. Molecular Ecology 7: 533-545.
21. FU, Y.-X. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147: 915-925.
22. FUNK, D. J., AND K. E. OMLAND. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 397-423.
23. GARCÍA-MORENO, J., N. CORTÉS, G. M. GARCÍA-DERAS, AND B. E. HERNÁNDEZ- BAÑOS. 2006. Local origin and diversification among Lampornis hummingbirds: A Mesoamerican taxon. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 488-498.
24. GARCÍA-MORENO, J., A. G. NAVARRO-SIGÜENZA, A. T. PETERSON, AND L. A. SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ. 2004. Genetic variation coincides with geographic structure in the Common Bush-Tanager (Chlorospingus ophthalmicus) complex from Mexico. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 186-196.
25. GARCÍA-PARIS, M., D. A. GOOD, G. PARRA-OLEA, AND D. B. WAKE. 2000. Biodiversity of Costa Rican salamanders: Implications of high levels of genetic differentiation and phylogeographic structure for species formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97: 1640-1647.
26. GOLOBOFF, P. L. 1993. NONA, version 2.0. Published by the author, TucumÁn, Argentina.
27. HACKETT, S. J. 1996. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of tanagers in the genus Ramphocelus (Aves). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 368-382.
28. HASBÚN, C. R., A. GÓMEZ, G. KÖHLER, AND D. H. LUNT. 2005. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the Mesoamerican spiny-tailed lizards (Ctenosaura quinquecarinata complex): Historical biogeography, species status and conservation. Molecular Ecology 14: 3095-3107.
29. HELBIG, A. J., A. G. KNOX, D. T. PARKIN, G. SANGSTER, AND M. COLLINSON. 2002. Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144: 518-525.
30. HELLMAYR, C. E. 1934. Catalogue of birds of the Americas and the adjacent islands. Field Museum of Natural History Zoological Series 13, part 7.
31. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
32. HUDSON, R. R., M. SLATKIN, AND W. P. MADDISON. 1992. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132: 583-589.
33. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
34. KASS, R. E., AND A. E. RAFTERY. 1995. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 773-795.
35. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29: 170-179.
36. KLICKA, J., AND R. M. ZINK. 1997. The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: A failed paradigm. Science 277: 1666-1669.
37. KNOWLES, L. L., AND W. P. MADDISON 2002. Statistical phylogeography. Molecular Ecology 11: 2623-2635.
38. LARGET, B., AND D. L. SIMON. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 750-759.
39. LESSON, R. P. 1838. Mémoire descriptif d'espèces ou de genres d'oiseaux nouveaux ou impairfaitment décrits. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Zoologie 9: 166-176.
40. LESSON, R. P. 1842. Species avium novae aut minus cognitae: Auctore R. P. Lesson in itinere A. Lessonio collectae. Revue Zoologique 5: 174-175.
41. LOVETTE, I. J. 2004a. Mitochondrial dating and mixed support for the 2% rule in birds. Auk 121: 1-6.
42. LOVETTE, I. J. 2004b. Molecular phylogeny and plumage signal evolution in a trans Andean and circum Amazonian avian species complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 512-523.
43. MONROE, B. L., JR. 1968. A distributional survey of the birds of Honduras. Ornithological Monographs, no. 7.
44. MORITZ, C. 1994. Defining 'evolutionarily significant units' for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 373-375.
45. MULCAHY, D. G., AND J. R. MENDELSON III. 2000. Phylogeog-raphy and speciation of the morphologically variable, widespread species Bufo valliceps, based on molecular evidence from mtDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 173-189.
46. MULCAHY, D. G., B. H. MORRILL, AND J. R. MENDELSUON III. 2006. Historical biogeography of lowland species of toads (Bufo) across the trans-Mexican neovolcanic belt and the Isthmus of Tehuante-pec. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1889-1904.
47. NAVARRO-SIGÜENZA, A. G., AND A. T. PETERSON. 2004. An alternative species taxonomy of the birds of Mexico. Biota Neotropica 4 (2): 1-32.
48. NAVARRO-SIGÜENZA, A. G., AND L. A. SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ. 2003. La diversidad de las aves. Pages 24-85 in Conservación de las Aves en México (H. Gómez de Silva and A. Oliveras de Ita, Eds.). CIPA-MEX, Mexico City.
49. NEI, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
50. NIXON, K. 2000. WINCLADA, version 0.9.99. Published by the author, Ithaca, New York.
51. NYLANDER, J. A. A., F. RONQUIST, J. P. HUELSENBECK, AND J. L. NIEVES-ALDREY. 2004. Bayesian Phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 53: 47-67.
52. ORR, H. A. 1997. Haldane's rule. Annual Review of Ecology and Sys-tematics 28: 195-218.
53. PETERS, J. L. 1960. Check-list of Birds of the World, vol. 9. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
54. PHILLIPS, A. R. 1986. The Known Birds of North and Middle America, part I. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, Colorado.
55. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
56. RABENOLD, K. N. 1990. Campylorhynchus wrens: The ecology of delayed dispersal and cooperation in the Venezuelan savanna. Pages 157-196 in Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-term Studies of Ecology and Behavior (P. B. Stacey and W. D. Koenig, Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
57. RAMOS-ONSINS, S. E., AND J. ROZAS. 2002. Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 2092-2100.
58. RAYMOND, M., AND F. ROUSSET. 1995. An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49: 1280-1283.
59. RIDGWAY, R. 1904. The birds of North and Middle America, part 3. Bulletin of the U.S. National Museum, no. 50.
60. ROGERS, A. R. 1995. Genetic evidence for a Pleistocene population explosion. Evolution 49: 608-615.
61. ROGERS, A. R., AND H. HARPENDING. 1992. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 9: 552-569.
62. ROZAS, J., J. C. SÁNCHEZ-DELBARRIO, X. MESSEGUER, AND R. ROZAS. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coales- cent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496-2497.
63. SCLATER, P. L. 1856. Characters of an apparently undescribed bird belonging to the genus Campylorhynchus, of Spix, with remarks upon other species of the same group. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 8: 263-265.
64. SELANDER, R. K. 1964. Speciation in wrens of the genus Campylorhynchus. University of California Publications in Zoology, no. 74.
65. SELANDER, R. K. 1965. Hybridization of Rufous-naped Wrens in Chiapas, México. Auk 82: 206-214.
66. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114-1116.
67. SLATKIN, M. 1993. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47: 264-279.
68. SOSA, R. 2007. Variación geográfica en las vocalizaciones del complejo Campylorhynchus rufinucha (Aves: Troglodytidae) de México. M.Sc. thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.
69. SPELLMAN, G. M., B. RIDDLE, AND J. KLICKA. 2007. Phylogeogra-phy of the Mountain Chickadee (Poecile gambeli): Diversification, introgression, and expansion in response to Quaternary climate change. Molecular Ecology 16: 1055-1068.
70. SULLIVAN, J., E. ARELLANO, AND D. S. ROGERS. 2000. Comparative phylogeography of Mesoamerican highland rodents: Concerted versus independent response to past climatic fluctuations. American Naturalist 155: 755-768.
71. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sun- derland, Massachusetts.
72. TAJIMA, F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
73. ZINK, R. M. 1994. The geography of mitochondrial DNA variation, population structure, hybridization, and species limits in the Fox Sparrow (Passerella iliaca). Evolution 48: 96-111.