The photographer and the greenhouse: How to analyse plant metabolomics data

Phytochemical Analysis

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 48-60

  Jansen, Jeroen J ^a   Smit, Suzanne ^a   Hoefsloot, Huub C J ^a   Smilde, Age K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chemometrics; Metabolomics; Multivariate analysis; Partial least squares regression; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

CHEMOMETRICES; LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA; METABOLOMICS; METABOLOMICS DATA; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE DATA ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL METHOD; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE REGRESSION; PLANT METABOLOMICS; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

GREENHOUSES;

BIOTRANSFORMATION; DATA ANALYSIS; GREENHOUSE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METABOLOMICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; PHOTOGRAPHY; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GROWTH; REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 73349092142     PISSN: 09580344     EISSN: 10991565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pca.1181     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Allwood JW, Ellis DI, Heald JK, Goodacre R, Mur LAJ. 2006. Metabolomic approaches reveal that phosphatidic and phosphatidyl glycerol phospholipids are major discriminatory non-polar metabolites in responses by Brachypodium distachyon to challenge by Magnaporthe grisea. Plant J 46: 351-368.
2. Barker M, Rayens W. 2003. Partial least squares for discrimination. J Chemometr 17: 166-173.
3. Bezemer TM, van Dam NM. 2005. Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via induced plant defenses. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 617-624.
4. Bro R, Smilde AK. 2003. Centering and scaling in component analysis. J Chemometr 17: 16-33.
5. Bro R, Kjeldahl K, Smilde A, Kiers H. 2008. Cross-validation of component models: a critical look at current methods. Anal Bioanal Chem 390: 1241-1251.
6. Broadhurst D, Kell D. 2006. Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments. Metabolomics 2: 171-196.
7. Bryson B. 2003. A Short History of Nearly Everything. Black Swan: London.
8. Castro C, Manetti C. 2007. A multiway approach to analyze metabonomic data: a study of maize seeds development. Anal Biochem 371: 194-200.
9. 1H NMR spectroscopic metabonomic studies. Anal Chem 77: 517-526.
10. Craig A, Cloarec O, Holmes E, Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. 2006. Scaling and normalization eff ects in NMR spectroscopic metabonomic data sets. Anal Chem 78: 2262-2267.
11. Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD. 2007. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom Rev 26: 51-78.
12. Dyrby M, Baunsgaard D, Bro R, Engelsen SB. 2005. Multiway chemometric analysis of the metabolic response to toxins monitored by NMR. Chemometr Intell Lab 76: 79-89.
13. Enot DP, Beckmann M, Overy D, Draper J. 2006. Predicting interpretability of metabolome models based on behavior, putative identity, and biological relevance of explanatory signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 14865-14870.
14. Fisher RA. 1936. The Use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7: 179-188.
15. Forshed J, Torgrip RJO, Åberg KM, Karlberg B, Lindberg J, Jacobsson SP. 2005. A comparison of methods for alignment of NMR peaks in the context of cluster analysis. J Pharm Biomed 38: 824-832.
16. Gabriel KR. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453-467.
17. Goodacre R, Vaidyanathan S, Dunn WB, Harrigan GG, Kell DB. 2004. Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol 22: 245-252.
18. Goodacre R, Broadhurst D, Smilde AK, Kristal BS, David Baker J, Beger R, Bessant C, Connor S, Capuani G, Craig A, Ebbels T, Kell DB, Manetti C, Newton J, Paternostro G, Somorjai R, Sjöström M, Trygg J, Wulfert F. 2007. Proposed minimum reporting standards for data analysis in metabolomics. Metabolomics 3: 231-241.
19. Holmes E, Antti H. 2002. Chemometric contributions to the evolution of metabonomics: mathematical solutions to characterising and interpreting complex biological NMR spectra. Analyst 127: 1549-1157.
20. Hoogerbrugge R, Willig SJ, Kistemaker PG.. 1983. Discriminant analysis by double stage principal component analysis. Anal Chem 55: 1710-1712.
21. Jackson JE. 1991. A User's Guide to Principal Components. Wiley-Interscience: New York.
22. Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HCJ, Boelens HFM, van der Greef J, Smilde AK. 2004. Analysis of longitudinal metabolomics data. Bioinformatics 20: 2438-2446.
23. Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HCJ, van der Greef J, Timmerman ME, Smilde AK. 2005. Multilevel Component Analysis of time-resolved metabolomics data. Anal Chim Acta 530: 173-183.
24. Jansen JJ, Bro R, Hoefsloot HCJ, van den Berg FWJ, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK. 2008. PARAFASCA: ASCA combined with PARAFAC for the analysis of metabolic fingerprinting data. J Chemometr 22: 114-121.
25. Jarvis RM, Goodacre R. 2005. Genetic algorithm optimization for preprocessing and variable selection of spectroscopic data. Bioinformatics 21: 860-868.
26. Johansson E, Wold S. 1984. Minimizing eff ects of closure on analytical data. Anal Chem 56: 1685-1688.
27. Johnson HE, Broadhurst D, Goodacre R, Smith AR. 2003. Metabolic fingerprinting of salt-stressed tomatoes. Phytochem 62: 919-928.
28. Jolliffe IT. 2002. Principal Component Analysis. Springer: New York.
29. 1H NMR data for metabolomics studies. Anal Chim Acta 636: 163-174.
30. Katajamaa M, Oresic M. 2007. Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. J Chromatogr A 1158: 318-328.
31. Kell DB, Darby RM, Draper J. 2001. Genomic computing. explanatory analysis of plant expression profiling data using machine learning. Plant Physiol 126: 943-951.
32. Keun HC, Ebbels TM, Bollard ME, Beckonert O, Antti H, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Nicholson JK. 2004. Geometric trajectory analysis of metabolic responses to toxcicity can define treatment specific profiles. Chem Res Toxicol 17: 579-587.
33. Lindon JC, Holmes E, Nicholson JK. 2000. Pattern recognition methods and applications in biomedical magnetic resonance. Prog Nucl Mag Res Spectrom 39: 1-40.
34. Lommen A. 2009. MetAlign: interface-driven, versatile metabolomics tool for hyphenated full-scan mass spectrometry data preprocessing. Anal Chem 81: 3079-3086.
35. Luedemann A, Strassburg K, Erban A, Kopka J. 2008. TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments. Bioinformatics 24: 732-737.
36. 1H NMR spectrotypes. J Proteome Res 8: 2397-2406
37. Phatak A, De Jong S. 1997. The geometry of partial least squares. J Chemometr 11: 311-338.
38. Rantalainen M, Cloarec O, Ebbels TMD, Lundstedt T, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Trygg J. 2008. Piecewise multivariate modelling of sequential metabolic profiling data. BMC Bioinformat 9: 105.
39. Rubingh C, Bijlsma S, Derks E, Bobeldijk I, Verheij E, Kochhar S, Smilde A. 2006. Assessing the performance of statistical validation tools for megavariate metabolomics data. Metabolomics 2: 1-9.
40. Smilde AK, Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HCJ, Lamers R, van der Greef J, Timmerman ME. 2005. ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA): a new tool for analyzing designed metabolomics data. Bioinformatics 21: 3043-3048.
41. Smit S, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smilde AK. 2008. Statistical data processing in clinical proteomics. J Chromatogr B 866: 77-88.
42. Scholz M, Gatzek S, Sterling A, Fiehn O, Selbig J. 2004. Metabolite fingerprinting: detecting biological features by independent component analysis. Bioinformatics 20: 2447-2454.
43. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry, Emerson R, Kennedy D, Park RB, Beadle GW, Whitaker DM (eds). W.H. Freeman: San Francisco, CA.
44. Stone M. 1974. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Ser B 36: 111-147.
45. Tikunov Y, Lommen A, de Vos CHR, Verhoeven HA, Bino RJ, Hall RD, Bovy AG.. 2005. A novel approach for nontargeted data analysis for metabolomics. Large-scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiol 139: 1125-1137.
46. van der Greef J, Smilde AK. 2005. Symbiosis of chemometrics and metabolomics: past, present, and future. J Chemometr 19: 376-386.
47. van der Werf MJ, Jellema RH, Hankemeier T. 2005. Microbial metabolomics: replacing trial-and-error by the unbiased selection and ranking of targets. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32: 234-252.
48. Westerhuis J, Hoefsloot H, Smit S, Vis D, Smilde A, van Velzen E, van Duijnhoven J, van Dorsten F. 2008. Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics 4: 81-89.
49. Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L. 2001. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab 58: 109-130.