An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations

Cognitive Linguistics

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 291-315

  Louwerse, Max ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

coherence; comprehension; connectives; discourse processing; interclausal relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013385129     PISSN: 09365907     EISSN: 16133641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cogl.2002.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bainbridge, Beryl 1989 An Awfully Big Adventure. London: Duckworth.
2. Caron, Jean, Hans Christoph Micko, and Manfred ThUring 1988 Conjunctions and recall of composite sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 309-323.
3. Cohen, Jonathan D., Brian MacWhinney, Matthew Flatt, and Jefferson Provost 1993 PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25 (2), 257-271.
4. Costermans, Jean and Michel Fayol (eds.) 1997 Processing Interclausal Relationships: Studies in the Production and Comprehension of Text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Cozijn, Reinier 2000 Integration and inference in understanding causal sentences. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
6. Deaton, Jennifer A. and Morton A. Gernsbacher in press Causal conjunctions cue mapping in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language.
7. Ferreira, Fernanda and Charles Clifton 1986 The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 348-368.
8. Garnham, Alan and Jane Oakhill 1996 The mental models theory of language comprehension. In Britton, B. K. and A. C. Graesser (eds.), Models of Understanding Text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 313-339.
9. Gernsbacher, Morton A. 1990 Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Givón, Talmy 1995 Coherence in the Text and Coherence in the Mind. In Gernsbacher, M. A. and T. Givon (eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 139-160.
11. Halliday, Michael A. K. and Rugaiya Hasan 1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
12. Hobbs, Jerry R. 1985 On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse. Technical Report CSLI-85-37. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
13. Kintsch, Walter 1995 How Readers Construct Situation Models for Stories: The Role of Syntactic Cues and Causal Inferences. In Gernsbacher, M. A. and T. Givon (eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 139-160.
14. Knott, Alistair 1996 A data-driven methodology for motivating a set of coherence relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
15. Knott, Alistair in press. Semantic and pragmatic relations and their intended effects. In Sanders, T., J. Schilperoord, and W. Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
16. Knott, Alistair and Robert Dale 1994 Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 18 (1), 35-62.
17. Konig, Ekkehard 1998 Concessive relations as the dual of causal relations. In Zaefferer, D. (ed.), Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics. Dordrecht: Foris, 190-209.
18. Lagerwerf, Luuk 1998 Causal Connectives Have Presuppositions: Effects on Coherence and Discourse Structure. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
19. Louwerse, Max M. 2000 From cohesion in text to coherence in comprehension. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
20. Louwerse, Max M. and Arthur C. Graesser in press Coherence in discourse. In Strazny, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.
21. Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson 1987 Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. Information Science Institute. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, ISI/RS-87-190, 1-81.
22. Martin, James R. 1992 English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
23. Millis, Keith K. and Marcel A. Just 1994 The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 128-147.
24. Noordman, Leo and Wietske Vonk 1997 The different functions of a conjunction in constructing a representation of the discourse. In Costermans, J. and M. Fayol (eds.), Processing Interclausal Relationships: Studies in the Production and Comprehension of Text. Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 75-93.
25. Rayner, Keith and Alexander Pollatsek 1989 The Psychology of Reading. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
26. Sanders, Ted 1997 Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes 24, 119-147.
27. Sanders, Ted J. M. and Leo G. M. Noordman 2000 The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in processing. Discourse Processes 29 (1), 37-60.
28. Sanders, Ted J. M., Wilbert P. M. Spooren, and Leo G. M. Noordman 1992 Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15, 1-35.
29. Sanders, Ted J. M., Wilbert P. M. Spooren, and Leo G. M. Noordman 1993 Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics 4-2, 93-133.
30. Sweetser, Eve 1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Causal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Townsend, David J. 1983 Thematic processing in sentences and texts. Cognition 13, 223-261.
32. Trueswell, John C., Michael K. Tanenhaus and Susan M. Garnsey 1994 Semantic influences on parsing: Use of the thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 285-318.
33. Zwaan, Rolf A. and Gabriel A. Radvansky 1998 Situation Models in Language Comprehension and Memory. Psychological Bulletin 123 (2), 162-185.