Working with lay people in health service research: A model of co-evolution based on complexity theory

Journal of Interprofessional Care

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 31-40

  Kernick, David ^a   Mitchell, Annie ^b  

^a General Practitioner   (United Kingdom)

^b Chartered Clinical Psychologist ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complexity; Consumer research; Lay research; Qualitative research; User involvement in research

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW;

GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 72749110773     PISSN: 13561820     EISSN: 14699567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13561820903012073     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Austoker, J. (1999). Involving patients in clinical research. British Medical Journal, 319, 724-725.
2. Bak, P. (1996). How nature works: The science of self organised criticality. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Bal, R., Bijker, W., & Hendriks, R. (2004). Democratisation of scientific advice. British Medical Journal, 329, 1339-1341.
4. Baxter, L., Thorne, L., & Mitchell, A. (2002). Small voices big noises. Exeter: Washington Singer Press.
5. Belam, J., Harris, G., Kernick, D., Kline, F., Lindley, K., McWatt, J., Mitchell, A., & Reinhold, D. (2005). A qualitative study of migraine involving patient researchers. British Journal of General Practice, 55, 87-93.
6. Beresford, P. (2005). Developing the theoretical basis of a service user/survivor led research and equal involvement in research. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 14(1), 4-9.
7. Black, N. (2000). Evidence based policy: Proceed with care. British Medical Journal, 323, 275-279.
8. Boote, J., Telford, R., & Cooper, C. (2002). Consumer involvement in health services research: A review and research agenda. Health Policy, 61, 213-236.
9. Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and post modernism. London: Routledge.
10. Department of Health (1998). In the public interest - developing a strategy for public participation in the NHS. London: DoH.
11. Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. London: Faber and Faber.
12. Gergen, K. (1999). An intervention to Social Constructionism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13. Giacomini, M. (2004). Interdisciplinarity in health services research: Dreams and nightmares, maladies and remedies. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 9(3), 177-183.
14. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos making a new science. New York: Viking Penguin.
15. Hanley, B., Bradburn, J., Gorin, S., Barnes, M., Evans, C., et al. (2000). Involving consumers in research and development in the NHS: Briefing notes for researchers. Winchester: Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit.
16. Kernick, D. (2003). Complexity and health care organisation. Abingdon: Radcliffe Press. of Health Service Research & Policy, 7(2), 121-124.
17. Liberati, A. (1997). Consumer participation in research and healthcare. British Medical Journal, 315, 499.
18. Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organisation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Oliver, S., Milne, R., Bradburn, J., Buchanan, P., Cerridge, L., Walley, T., & Gabbay, J. (2001). Involving consumers in a needs led research programme: A pilot study. Health Expectation, 4, 18-28.
20. Ovretveit, J., & Gustafson, D. (2003). Using research to inform quality programmes. British Medical Journal, 326, 759-761.
21. Park, P. (1992). The discovery of participatory research as a new scientific paradigm: Personal and intellectual accounts. American Sociologist, 23, 29-43.
22. Pilgrim, D., & Waldron, L. (1998). User involvement in mental health service development: How far can it go? Journal of Mental Health, 7, 95-104.
23. Plsek, P. (2000). Re-designing healthcare with insights from the science of complex adaptive systems. In Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century (pp. 309-322). Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine/ National Academy Press.
24. Schrijvers, J. (1991). Dialectics of dialogical ideal: Studying down, studying sideways and studying up. In L. Rencel & P. Pells (Eds.), Constructing knowledge. London: Sage.
25. Smith, E., Ross, F., Donovan, S., Manthorpe, J., Brearley, S., et al. (2008). Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: A review of evidence and practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 298-315.
26. Srivastva, S., Obert, S., & Neilson, E. (1997). Organisational analysis through group processes. A theoretical perspective. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Organisational development in the UK and USA (Ch. 4, pp. 83-111). London: MacMillan.
27. Stacey, R., Griffen, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management. London: Routledge.
28. Telford, R., Boote, J., Cooper, C., & Stobbs, M. (2003). Principles of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: Results of a consensus study and national survey. University of Sheffield: Scharr.
29. Walter, I., Davies, H., & Nutley, S. (2003). Increasing research impact through partnerships: Evidence from outside health care. Journal of Health Service Research Policy, 2, 58-61.
30. Wickham, J., & Collins, G. (2006). Involving users in social science research - a new European paradigm? European Journal of Education, 41(20), 269-280.