Democratisation of scientific advice

British Medical Journal

Volumn 329, Issue 7478, 2004, Pages 1339-1341

  Bal, Roland ^a   Bijker, Wiebe E ^b,c   Hendriks, Ruud ^b,c  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Technology and Society Studies ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; NETHERLANDS; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HEALTH COUNCIL (NETHERLANDS); HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLICY; SCIENCE; STANDARD;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HEALTH COUNCIL (NETHERLANDS);

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; SCIENCE;

EID: 16544387186     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1339     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Weingart P. Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Public Policy 1999;26:151-61.
2. Jasanoff S. Harmonization: the politics of reasoning together. In: Bal R, Halffman W, eds. The politics of chemical risk. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1998:173-94.
3. Woodhouse EJ, Nieusma DA. Democratic expertise: integrating knowledge, power, and participation. In: Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R, Dunn WN, Ravetz JR, eds. Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2001:73-95.
4. Trusnet Framework. A new perspective on risk governance. Brussels: European Commission, 2000. (Report NO EUR 19150 EN.)
5. Gulick L. Notes on the theory of organization. In: Gulick L, Urwick L, eds. Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, 1937:3-13.
6. Fiorino DJ. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 1990;15:226-43.
7. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Science and society, London: Stationery Office, 2000.
8. Fortuyn WSP. Ordening door ontvlechting. Een advies over de adviesstructuur in de volksgezondheid. Rijswijk: Ministerie van WVC, 1990.
9. Bal R, Bijker WE, Hendriks R. Paradox van wetenschappdijk gezag. Over de maatschappdijke invloed van adviezen van de Gezondheidsraad, 1985-2001. The Hague: Gezondheidsraad, 2002.
10. Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. 8th ed. London; Penguin, 1990.
11. Hilgartner S. Science on stage: expert advice as public drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.
12. Hindmarsh J, Pilnick A. The tacit order of teamwork: collaboration and embodied conduct in anesthesia. Sociol Q 2002;43:139-64.
13. Gezondheidsraad. Dyslexie. Afbakening en behandeling. The Hague: Gezondheidsraad, 1995. (Report No 1995/15.)
14. Collins HM, Evans R. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Soc Stud Sci 2002;32:235-96.