Facilitation by view combination and coherent motion in dynamic object recognition

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 202-210

  Friedman, Alinda ^a   Vuong, Quoc C ^b   Spetch, Marcia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Motion; Object recognition; Similarity in object recognition; View combination; Viewpoint interpolation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 72749084340     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 115-147
2. Bülthoff H.H., and Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89 (1992) 60-64
3. Cook R.G., and Katz J.S. Dynamic object perception by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 25 (1999) 194-210
4. Cook R.G., and Roberts S. The role of video coherence on object-based motion discriminations by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 33 (2007) 287-298
5. Cook R.G., Shaw R., and Blaisdell A.P. Dynamic object perception by pigeons: Discrimination of action in video presentations. Animal Cognition 4 (2001) 137-146
6. Edelman S. Representation and recognition in vision (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Edelman S., and Bülthoff H.H. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research 32 (1992) 2385-2400
8. Freyd J.J. Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 427-438
9. Freyd J.J., and Finke R.A. Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 10 (1984) 126-132
10. Freyd J.J., and Finke R.A. A velocity effect for representational momentum. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (1985) 443-446
11. Friedman A., Spetch M.L., and Ferrey A. Recognition by humans and pigeons of novel views of 3-D objects and their photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134 (2005) 149-162
12. Friedman A., Vuong Q.C., and Spetch M.L. View combination in moving objects: The role of motion in discriminating between novel views of similar and distinctive objects by humans and pigeons. Vision Research 49 (2009) 594-607
13. Friedman A., and Waller D. View combination in scene recognition. Memory & Cognition 36 (2008) 467-478
14. Harman K.L., and Humphrey G.K. Encoding "regular" and "random" sequences of views of novel three-dimensional objects. Perception 1999 (1999) 601-615
15. Kourtzi Z., and Nakayama K. Distinct mechanisms for the representation of moving and static objects. Visual Cognition 8 (2002) 248-264
16. Kourtzi Z., and Shiffrar M. The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects. Acta Psychologica 102 (1999) 265-292
17. Kourtzi Z., and Shiffrar M. Visual representation of malleable and rigid objects that deform as they rotate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 27 (2001) 335-355
18. Liu T. Learning sequence of views of three-dimensional objects: The effect of temporal coherence on object memory. Perception 36 (2007) 1320-1333
19. Loftus G.R., and Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 (1994) 476-490
20. Loidolt M., Aust U., Steurer M., Troje N., and Huber L. Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: Dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape. Learning & Behavior 34 (2006) 71-85
21. Peissig J.J., Wasserman E.A., Young M.E., and Biederman I. Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2051-2062
22. Reed C.L., and Vinson L.G. Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 22 (1996) 839-850
23. Schultz J., Chang L., and Vuong Q.C. A dynamic object-processing network: Metric shape discrimination of dynamic objets by activation of ocipito-temporal, parietal and frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 18 (2008) 1302-1313
24. Sekuler A.B., and Palmer S.E. Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121 (1992) 95-111
25. Shepard R.N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237 (1987) 1317-1323
26. Spetch M.L., and Friedman A. Recognizing rotated views of objects: Interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons. Psychological Bulletin & Review 10 (2003) 135-140
27. Spetch M.L., Friedman A., and Reid S.L. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2001) 238-255
28. Spetch M., Friedman A., and Vuong Q.C. Dynamic object recognition in pigeons and humans. Learning & Behavior 34 (2006) 215-228
29. Stone J.V. Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures. Vision Research 38 (1998) 947-951
30. Stone J.V. Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research 39 (1999) 4032-4044
31. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H., Zabinski M., and Blanz V. To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoints?. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 282-289
32. Ullman S. Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views. Cognition 67 (1998) 21-44
33. Vetter T., and Poggio T. Symmetric 3D objects are an easy case for 2D object recognition. Spatial Vision 8 (1994) 443-453
34. Vuong Q.C., and Tarr M.J. Rotation direction affects object recognition. Vision Research 44 (2004) 1717-1730
35. Vuong Q.C., and Tarr M.J. Structural similarity and spatiotemporal noise effects on learning dynamic novel objects. Perception 35 (2006) 497-510
36. Wallis G., and Bülthoff H.H. Effects of temporal association on recognition memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (2001) 4800-4804
37. Wang G., Obama S., Yamashita W., Sugihara T., and Tanaka K. Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1768-1775
38. Weigelt S., Kourtzi Z., Kohler A., Singer W., and Muckli L. The cortical representation of objects rotating in depth. The Journal of Neuroscience 27 (2007) 3864-3874