Visual representation of malleable and rigid objects that deform as they rotate

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 335-355

  Kourtzi, Zoe ^a   Shiffrar, Maggie ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; ROTATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROTATION;

EID: 85047685080     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.335     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Baillargeon, R. (1986). Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants. Cognition, 23, 21-41.
2. Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191-208.
3. Bartram, D. (1974). The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 325-356.
4. Basri, R., Costa, L., Geiger, D., & Jacobs, D. (1998). Determining the similarity of deformable shapes. Vision Research, 38, 2365-2385.
5. Bassili, J. N. (1976). Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 680-685.
6. Bassili, J. N. (1978). Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 373-379.
7. Berbaum, K., Lenel, J. C., & Rosenbaum, H. (1981). Dimensions of figural identity and apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1312-1317.
8. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-117.
9. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
10. Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1995). Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1473-1493.
11. Braddick, O. (1994). Motion perception: Moving on the surface. Current Biology, 3, 534-536.
12. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
13. Capek, M. (1961). The philosophical impact of contemporary physics. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
14. Cooper, L. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1992). Dissociations between structural and episodic representations of visual objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 141-146.
15. Cutting, J. E. (1987). Perception and information. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 61-90.
16. Cutting, J. E., Proffitt, D. R., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). A biomechanical invariant of gait perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 357-372.
17. Edelman, S., & Weinshall, D. (1991). A self-organizing multiple view representation of 3-D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 209-219.
18. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 722.
19. Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438.
20. Gibson, E. J., Riccio, G., Schmuckler, M. A., Stoffregen, T. A., Rosenberg, D., & Taormina, J. (1987). Detection of the traversability of surfaces by crawling and walking infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 533-544.
21. Gibson, E. J., & Walker, A. S. (1984). Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. Child Development, 55, 453-460.
22. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
24. Gray, H. G., & Isaacs, A. (1975). A new dictionary of physics. London: Longman Group.
25. Hadjikhani, N., & Roland, P. E. (1998). Cross-modal transfer of information between the tactile and the visual representations in the human brain: A positron emission tomographic study. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 1072-1084.
26. He, Z., & Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
27. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1994a). Apparent motion determined by surface layout not by disparity or three-dimensional distance. Nature, 367, 173-175.
28. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1994b). Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering. Vision Research, 34, 151-162.
29. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1994c). Surface shape not features determines apparent motion correspondence. Vision Research, 34, 2125-2136.
30. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
31. Hilbert, D., & Cohn-Vossen, S. (1952). Geometry and the imagination. New York: Chelsea.
32. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
33. Ishiguchi, A. (1988). Interpolated elastic structure from the motion of dots. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 457-464.
34. Ishiguchi, A. (1990). Perception of structure from two-, four-, or eight-dot oscillatory motion: Restoration of rigidity with the aid of structural information. Perception, 19, 197-205.
35. Jansson, G. (1977). Perceived bending and stretching motions from a line of points. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 209-215.
36. Jansson, G., & Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of bending motion. Perception, 2, 321-326.
37. Jansson, G., & Runeson, S. (1977). Perceived bending motions from a quadrangle changing form. Perception, 6, 595-600.
38. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
39. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
40. Jolicoeur, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461-478.
41. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind and Language, 5, 387-410.
42. Jolicoeur, P., & Landau, M. J. (1984). Effects of rotation in the identification of similar visual patterns. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 80-93.
43. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1979). The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision. Biological Cybernetics, 32, 211-216.
44. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1986). Depth and shape from differential perspective in the presence of bending deformation. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 3, 243-249.
45. Kolers, P., & Pomerantz, P. (1971). Figural change in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 99-108.
46. Koriat A., & Norman, J. (1988). Frames and images: Sequential effects in mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 93-111.
47. Koriat A., & Norman, J. (1989). Establishing global and local correspondence between successive stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 480-495.
48. Kourtzi, Z., & Shiffrar, M. (1997). One-shot view-invariance in a moving world. Psychological Science, 8, 461-466.
49. Kourtzi, Z., & Shiffrar, M. (1999a). Dynamic representations of human body movement. Perception, 28, 49-62.
50. Kourtzi, Z., & Shiffrar, M. (1999b). The representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects. Acta Psychologica, 102, 265-292.
51. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
52. Landau, B., & Leyton, M. (1999). Perception, object kind, and object naming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
53. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994) View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
54. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
55. Love, A. E. H. (1944). A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity. New York: Dover.
56. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of three dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 200, 269-294.
57. Massironi, M., & Bruno, N. (1997). The perception of surface folding in static and animated displays. Perception, 26, 153-170.
58. Morgan, M. J. (1980). Analogue models of motion perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 290, 117-135.
59. Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower level and higher level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn (Ed.), Vision: An invitation to cognitive science (pp. 1-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., & Silverman, G. H. (1989). Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception, 18, 55-68.
61. Ohmura, H. (1986). The role of stimulus intensity, color, and form in visual stream. Japanese Psychological Research, 28, 21-29.
62. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
64. Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). The rubber pencil illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 365-368.
65. Rock, I., DiVita, J., & Barbeito, R. (1981). The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 719-732.
66. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Kusunoki, A., & Tanaka, Y. (1997). The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action. Trends in Neuroscience, 20, 350-357.
67. Sekuler, A. B., & Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
68. Shepard, R. N. (1978). The mental image. American Psychologist, 33, 125-137.
69. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
70. Shepard, R. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 2-28.
71. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Shepard, R. N., & Judd, S. A. (1976). Perceptual illusions of rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 191, 952-954.
73. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
74. Shepard, S., & Metzler, D. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 3-11.
75. Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257-264.
76. Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1993). Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science, 4, 379-384.
77. Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Amodal presence of partially occluded surfaces determines apparent motion. Perception, 19, 285-299.
78. Shimojo, S., Silverman, G. H., & Nakayama, K. (1989). Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion. Vision Research, 29, 619-626.
79. Sklar, E., Bülthoff, H. H., Edelman, S., & Basri, R. (1993). Generalization of object recognition across stimulus rotation and deformation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 34, 1081.
80. Snowden, R. J., & Braddick, O. J. (1990). Differences in the processing of short-range apparent motion at small and large displacements. Vision Research, 30, 1211-1222.
81. Squire, L. (1987). Memory and brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
82. Stevens, J. A., Fonlupt, P., Shiffrar, M., & Decety, J. (2000). Selective recruitment of motor and parietal cortex during visual perception of apparent human movement. NeuroReport, 11, 109-115.
83. Stoffregen, T. A., & Flynn, S. B. (1994). Visual perception of support-surface deformability from human body kinematics. Ecological Psychology, 6, 33-64.
84. Tarr, M. J. & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
85. Tarr, M. J. & Pinker, S. (1990). When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame? Psychological Science, 1, 253-256.
86. Todd, J. T. (1982). Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: A geometric analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 238-252.
87. Todd, J. T. (1984). The perception of three-dimensional structure from rigid and non-rigid motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 97-103.
88. Trueswell, J. C., & Hayhoe, M. (1993). Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception. Vision Research, 33, 313-328.
89. Ullman, S., & Basri, R. (1991). Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13, 992-1006.
90. von Fieandt, K. V., & Gibson, J. J. (1959). The sensitivity of the eye to two kinds of continuous transformations of a shadow pattern. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 344-347.
91. Warren, W. H. (1977). Visual information for object identity in apparent movement. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 264-268.
92. Warren, W. H., Kim, E. E., & Husney, R. (1987). The way the ball bounces: Visual and auditory perception of elasticity and control of the bounce pass. Perception, 16, 309-336.