View combination in scene recognition

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 467-478

  Friedman, Alinda ^a   Waller, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; SPATIAL MEMORY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL MEMORY; ADULT; ATTITUDE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; VISION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 45849103138     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.3.467     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
3. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
4. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., EDELMAN, S., & TARR, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 5, 247-260.
5. CARLSON-RADVANSKY, L. A., & RADVANSKY, G. A. (1996). The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection. Psychological Science, 7, 56-60.
6. DIWADKAR, V. A., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
7. EDELMAN, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. EDELMAN, S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
9. EDELMAN, S., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & BÜLTHOFF, I. (1999). Effects of parametric manipulation of inter-stimulus similarity on 3D object categorization. Spatial Vision, 12, 107-123.
10. FRIEDMAN, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
11. FRIEDMAN, A., & HARDING, C. A. (1990). Seeing versus imagining movement in depth. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 371-383.
12. FRIEDMAN, A., SPETCH, M. L., & FERREY, A. (2005). Recognition by humans and pigeons of novel views of 3-D objects and their photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 149-162.
13. GOTTESMAN, C. V., & INTRAUB, H. (2003). Constraints on spatial extrapolation in the mental representation of scenes: View-boundaries vs. object-boundaries. Visual Cognition, 10, 875-893.
14. HENDERSON, J. M., & HOLLINGWORTH, A. (2003). Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science, 14, 493-497.
15. HOCK, H. S., & SCHMELZKOPF, K. F. (1980). The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition, 8, 543-554.
16. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2004). Sustained change blindness to incremental scene rotation: A dissociation between explicit change detection and visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 800-807.
17. INTRAUB, H., GOTTESMAN, C. V., & BILLS, A. (1998). Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 186-201.
18. INTRAUB, H., GOTTESMAN, C. V., WILLEY, E. V., & ZUK, I. J. (1996). Boundary extension for briefly glimpsed photographs: Do common perceptual processes result in unexpected memory distortions? Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 118-134.
19. INTRAUB, H., & RICHARDSON, M. (1989). Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 179-187.
20. LOFTUS, G. R., & MACKWORTH, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 565-572.
21. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
22. MANDLER, J. M., & PARKER, R. E. (1976). Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 38-48.
23. MANDLER, J. M., & STEIN, N. L. (1974). Recall and recognition of pictures by children as a function of organization and distractor similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 657-669.
24. MARR, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
25. MCNAMARA, T. P., DIWADKAR, V. A., BLEVINS, W. A., & VALIQUETTE, C. M. (2006). Representations of apparent rotation. Visual Cognition, 13, 273-307.
26. NEWCOMBE, N. S., & HUTTENLOCHER, J. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. O'KEEFE, J., & NADEL, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
28. SHELTON, A. L., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
29. SHEMYAKIN, F. N. (1962). Orientation in space. In B. G. Anan'yev et al. (Eds.), Psychological science in the USSR (Vol. 1, Pt. 1, pp. 186-255). Washington, DC: U. S. Office of Technical Reports.
30. SIEGEL, A. W., & WHITE, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 10-55). New York: Academic Press.
31. SPETCH, M. L., & FRIEDMAN, A. (2003). Recognizing rotated views of objects: Interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 135-140.
32. SPETCH, M. L., FRIEDMAN, A., & REID, S. L. (2001). The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 238-255.
33. TARR, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
34. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
35. TOLMAN, E. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208.
36. ULLMAN, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
37. ULLMAN, S. (1996). High-level vision: Object recognition and visual cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.