Structural similarity and spatiotemporal noise effects on learning dynamic novel objects

Perception

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 497-510

  Vuong, Quoc C ^a,b   Tarr, Michael J ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646529208     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p5491     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Biederman I, 1987 "Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding" Psychological Review 94 115- 147
2. Biederman I, Gerhardstein P C, 1993 "Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 1162- 1182
3. Bruce V, Valentine T, 1988 "When a nod's as good as a wink: The role of dynamic information in facial recognition", in Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues volume 1, Eds N N Gruneberg, P E Morris, R N Sykes (Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons) pp 169- 174
4. Bülthoff H H, Edelman S, 1992 "Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 89 60-64
5. Cutting J, Kozlowski L, 1977 "Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues" Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9 353-356
6. Foster D H, Gilson S J, 2002 "Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views" Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269 1939- 1947
7. Harman K L, Humphrey G K, 1999 "Encoding 'regular' and 'random' sequences of views of novel three-dimensional objects" Perception 28 601 -615
8. Hayward W G, Williams P, 2000 "Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability" Psychological Science 117-12
9. Hill H, Pollick F E, 2000 "Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light display" Psychological Science 11 223-227
10. Johansson G, 1973 "Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis" Perception & Psychophysics 14 201 -211
11. Knappmeyer B, Thornton I M, Bülthoff H H, 2003 "The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity" Vision Research 43 1921 - 1936
12. Kourtzi Z, Shiffrar M, 1999 "The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects" Acta Psychologica 102 265-292
13. Lander K, Bruce V, 2000 "Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion" Ecological Psychology 12 259-272
14. Lawson R, Humphreys G W, Watson D G, 1994 "Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures" Perception 23 595-614
15. Liu T, Cooper L A, 2003 "Explicit and implicit memory for rotating objects" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 554-562
16. Marr D, 1982 Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman)
17. Marr D, Nishihara H K, 1978 "Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of threedimensional shapes" Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 200 269 - 294
18. Mather G, Murdoch L, 1994 "Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues" Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 258 273 - 279
19. Newell F N, Wallraven C, Huber S, 2004 "The role of characteristic motion in object categorization" Journal of Vision 4 118 - 129
20. O'Toole A J, Roark D A, Abdi H, 2002 "Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 261 - 266
21. Perlin K, 1985 "An image synthesizer" Computer Graphics 19 287-296
22. Poggio T, Edelman S, 1990 "A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects" Nature 34263-266
23. Stone J V, 1998 "Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures" Vision Research 38 947-951
24. Stone J V, 1999 "Object recognition: view-specificity and motion-specificity" Vision Research 39 4032-4044
25. Tarr M J, Bülthoff H H, 1995 "Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993)" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 1494 - 1505
26. Tarr M J, Pinker S, 1989 "Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition" Cognitive Psychology 21 233-282
27. Thornton I M, Kourtzi Z, 2002 "A matching advantage for dynamic human faces" Perception 31 113-132
28. Ullman S, 1984 "Maximizing rigidity: The incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and rubbery motion" Perception 13 255 - 274
29. Vuong Q C, Tarr M J, 2004 "Rotation direction affects object recognition" Vision Research 44 1717-1730
30. Wallis G, Bülthoff H H, 1999 "Learning to recognize objects" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 22-31
31. Wallis G, Bülthoff H H, 2001 "Effects of temporal association on recognition memory" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98 4800-4804