Applications of the choice experiment method in Europe: A review

Choice Experiments Informing Environmental Policy: A European Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 12-57

  Birol, Ekin ^a,b   Koundouri, Phoebe ^c   Kountouris, Yiannis ^c  

^a INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72149112339     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781848441255.00009     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Alvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N. (2002), 'Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of windfarms: an example from Spain', Energy Policy, 30: 116-.
2. Alvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N., Barberán, R., Lázaro, A. (2007), 'Choice modeling at the "market stall": individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation', Ecological Economics, 60(4751-.
3. Arsenio, E., Bristow, A.L.,Wardman, M. (2006), 'Stated choice valuations of traffic related noise', Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 11(131-.
4. Bennett, R., Willis, K. (2007), 'The value of badger populations and control of tuberculosis in cattle in England and Wales: a note', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(1156-.
5. Bergmann, A., Hanley, N., Wright, R. (2006), 'Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments', Energy Policy, 34: 1014-.
6. Birol, E., Cox, V. (2007), 'Using choice experiments to design wetland management programmes: the case of Severn Estuary Wetland, UK', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(3380-.
7. Birol, E., Karousakis, K., Koundouri, P. (2006), 'Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece', Ecological Economics, 60: 156-.
8. Birol, E., Smale, M., Gyovai, A. (2006), 'Using a choice experiment to estimate farmers' valuation of agrobiodiversity on Hungarian small farms', Environmental and Resource Economics, 34(4469-.
9. Burton, M., Rigby, M., Young, T., James, S. (2001), 'Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in the UK', European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(4498-.
10. Carlsson, F., Frykblom, P., Lagerkvist, C.-J. (2005), 'Consumer preferences for food product quality attributes from Swedish agriculture', Ambio, 34(4-5): 366-370.
11. Carlsson, F., Frykblom, P., Lagerkvist, C.J. (2007), 'Consumer benefits of labels and bans on GM foods: choice experiments with Swedish consumers', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89 (1): 152-161.
12. Carlsson, F., Frykblom, P., Liljenstolpe, C. (2003), 'Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments', Ecological Economics, 47: 103-.
13. Carlsson, F., Lampi, E., Martinsson, P. (2004), 'The marginal values of noise disturbance from air traffic: does the time of the day matter?', Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9 (5): 373-385.
14. Christie, M., Hanley, N., Warren, J., Murphy, K., Wright, R., Hyde, T. (2006), 'Valuing the diversity of biodiversity', Ecological Economics, 58(2317-.
15. Colombo, S., Calatrava-Requena, J., Hanley, N. (2006), 'Analysing the social benefits of soil conservation measures using stated preference methods', Ecological Economics, 58: 861-.
16. Colombo, S., Calatrava-Requena, J., Hanley, N. (2007), 'Testing choice experiment for benefit transfer with preference heterogeneity', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(1151-.
17. Colombo, S., Hanley,N., Calatrava-Requena, J. (2005), 'Designing policy for reducing the off-farm effects of soil erosion using choice experiments', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(195-.
18. Enneking, U. (2004), 'Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: the case of the Q&S label', European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(2223-.
19. Garrod, G., Willis, K. (1998), 'Estimating lost amenity due to landfill waste disposal', Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 22: 95-.
20. Hanley, N., Adamowicz, W., Wright, R.E. (2005), 'Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test', Resource and Energy Economics, 27: 234-.
21. Hanley, N., Colombo, S., Tinch, D., Black, A., Aftab, A. (2006), 'Estimating the benefits of water quality improvements under theWater Framework Directive: are benefits transferable?', EuropeanReview of Agricultural Economics, 33(3413-.
22. Hanley,N., MacMillan,D., Patterson, I.,Wright, R. (2003), 'Economics and design of nature conservation policy: a case study of wild goose conservation in Scotland using choice experiments', Animal Conservation, 6: 129-.
23. Hanley, N., MacMillan, D., Wright, R.E., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parsisson, D., Crabtree, B. (1998), 'Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(115-.
24. Hanley, N., Wright, R.E., Adamowicz, V. (1998), 'Using choice experiments to value the environment: design issues, current experience and future prospects', Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3-4): 413-428.
25. Hanley, N., Wright, R.E., Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2006), 'Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive', Journal of Environmental Management, 78: 193-.
26. Hasler, B., Lundhede, T., Martinsen, L., Neye, S., Schoi, J.S. (2005), Valuation of groundwater protection versus water treatment in Denmark by choice experiments and contingent valuation, NERI Technical Report No. 543, National Environmental Research Institute, Aarhus, Denmark.
27. Hiselius, L.W. (2005), 'Using choice experiments to assess people's preferences for railway transports of hazardous materials', Risk Analysis, 25(51214-.
28. Horne, P. (2006), 'Forest owners' acceptance of incentive based policy instruments in forest biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment based approach', Silva Fennica, 40: 178-.
29. Horne, P., Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W.L. (2005), 'Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment', Forest Ecology and Management, 207: 199-.
30. Horne, P., Petäjistö, L. (2003), 'Preferences for alternative moose management regimes among Finnish landowners: a choice experiment approach', Land Economics, 79(4482-.
31. Karousakis, K., Birol, E. (forthcoming), 'Investigating household preferences for kerbside recycling services in London: a choice experiment approach', Journal of Environmental Management.
32. Lagerkvist, C.J., Carlsson, F., Viske, D. (2006), 'Swedish consumer preferences for animal welfare and biotech: a choice experiment', AgBioForum, 9(158-.
33. Lehtonen, E., Kuuluvainen, J., Pouta, E., Rekola, M., Li, C.-Z. (2003), 'Nonmarket benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland', Environmental Science and Policy, 6(3204-.
34. Li, C-Z., Kuuluvainen, J., Pouta, E., Rekola, M., Tahvonen, O. (2004), 'Using choice experiments to value the Natura 2000 nature conservation programs in Finland', Environmental and Resource Economics, 29: 374-.
35. Lusk, J.L., Roosen, J., Fox, J.A. (2003), 'Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: a comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(629-.
36. Nunes, P.A.L.D., Rossetto, L., de Blaeij, A. (2004), 'Measuring the economic value of alternative clam fishing management practices in the Venice Lagoon: results from a conjoint valuation application', Journal of Marine Systems, 51: 320-.
37. Paulrud, A., Laitila, T. (2004), 'Valuation of management policies for sport-fishing on Sweden's Kaitum River', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(6879-.
38. Rigby, D., Burton, M. (2005), 'Preference heterogeneity and GM food in the UK', European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(2288-.
39. Scarpa, R., Del Giudice, T.D. (2004), 'Market segmentation via mixed logit: extravirgin olive oil in urban Italy', Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 2(1160-.
40. Scarpa, R., Philippidis, G., Spalatro, F. (2005), 'Product-country images and preference heterogeneity for Mediterranean food products: a discrete choice framework', Agribusiness, 21(3349-.
41. Sundqvist, T. (2002a), 'Quantifying non-residential preferences over the environmental impacts of hydropower in Sweden: a choice experiment approach', in Power generation choice in the presence of environmental externalities, Doctoral Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
42. Sundqvist, T. (2002b), 'Quantifying household preferences over the environmental impacts of hydropower in Sweden: a choice experiment approach', in Power generation choice in the presence of environmental externalities, Doctoral Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
43. Toma, L., Mathijs, E. (2004), 'Stated environmental preferences in a Romanian rural community', Post-Communist Economies, 16(2227-.
44. Travisi, C., Nijkamp, P. (2004), Willingness to pay for agricultural environmental safety: evidence from a survey of Milan, Italy, residents, Tinbergen Institute Discussion paper TI, 04-070/3, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam the Netherlands.
45. Wardman, M., Bristow, A.L. (2004), 'Traffic related noise and air quality valuations: evidence from stated preference residential choice models', Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9(127-.
46. Wardman, M., Hatfield, R., Page, M. (1997), 'The UK national cycling strategy: can improved facilities meet the targets?', Transport Policy, 4(2133-.
47. Willis, K.G., McMahon, P.L., Garrod, G.D., Powe, N.A. (2002), 'Water companies service performance and environmental trade-offs', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(3379-.
48. Willis, K.G., Scarpa, R., Acutt, M. (2005), 'Assessing water company customer preferences and willingness to pay for service improvements: a stated choice analysis', Water Resources Research, 41: 11-.