Designing policy for reducing the off-farm effects of soil erosion using choice experiments

Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 81-95

  Colombo, Sergio ^a   Hanley, Nick ^b   Calatrava Requena, Javier ^a  

^a IFAPA CENTRO EL TORUÑO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESERTIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EROSION CONTROL; SOIL EROSION;

ANDALUCIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GUADAJOZ BASIN; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN; WORLD;

EID: 15844431972     PISSN: 0021857X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2005.tb00123.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adamowicz, W., Louviere J. and Williams M. (1994). Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Methods for valuing Environmental Amenities, Journal Environmental Economic and Management 26:271-292.
2. Adamowicz, W., Boxall P., Williams M. and Louviere J. (1998). Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:64-75.
3. Alfsen, K.H., De-Franco, M.A., Glomsrod, S. and Johnsen, T., (1996). The CXost of Soil Erosion in Nicaragua, Ecological Economics 16 129-145.
4. Asociación Española Agricultura de Conservación/ Suelos Vivos, AEAC/SV, (2001) Agricultura de Conservación en el Olivar: Cubiertas Vegetales.
5. Barbier, E.B., (1995) "The Economics of Soil Erosion". Fifth Biannual Workshop on Economy and Environment in Southeast Asia (Singapore, November 28-30, 1995).
6. Bateman, I., Carson, R., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D., Sugden, R., and Swanson J. (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preferences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7. Bennett, J. and Adamowicz, W. (2001) "Some Fundamentals of Environmental Choice Modelling" in Bennett J. and Blamey R. (eds) The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Evaluation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
8. Bennett J and Blamey R (eds) (2001) The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. Bergmann A., Hanley N. and Wright R. (2004) "Valuing the Attributes of Renewable Energy Investments" Paper presented to the 2004 EAERE conference, Budapest, Hungary.
10. Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W., Williams M., Swait J., and Louviere J., (1996) A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation, Ecological Economics 18:243-253.
11. Colombo, S., Calatrava J. and Hanley N. (2003): The Economic Benefits of Soil Erosion Control: An Application of the Contingent Valuation Method in the Alto Genil Basin
12. Domencich, T., and McFadden, D., (1975). Urban Travel Demand: a Behavioural Approach, Amsterdam, North-Holland.
13. Feather, P., Hellerstein, D. and Hansen L., (1999) Economic Valuation of Environmental Benefits and the Targeting of Conservation Programs: The Case of the CRP. AER-778, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, April.
14. Grove, A.T., (1996): The Historical Context: Before 1850; in The Mediterranean: Desertification and Land Use, Brandt, Thornes J. Eds, Wiley, Chichester, England.
15. Gunatilake, H.M., and Vieth, G.R., (2000). Estimation of On-site Cost of Soil Erosion: A Comparison Of Replacement and Productivity Change Methods, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55 2):197-204.
16. Hanley N, Wright R and Adamowicz W (1998) "Using choice experiments to value the environment: design issues, current experience and future prospects". Environmental and Resource Economics, 11 3-4):413-428.
17. Hanley N, MacMillan D, Patterson I and Wright R (2003) Economics and the Design of Nature Conservation Policy: A Case Study of Wild Geese Conservation in Scotland Using Choice Experiments. Animal Conservation 6:123-129.
18. Hansen, L.T., Breneman, V.E., Davison, C. W. and Dicken C.W. (2002). The Cost of Soil Erosion to Downstream Navigation, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 57(4):205-212.
19. Hausman J. and McFadden D. (1984) "Specification Tests for the Multi-nomial Logit Model" Econometrica 52:1219-1240.
20. Lancaster, K., (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory, Journal of Political Economy 74:132-157.
21. Louviere, J., Hensher D and Swait J (2000). Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Louviere J., Street D., Carson R, Ainslie A, DeShazo JR, Cameron T, Hensher D, Kohn R, and Marley T. (2002) "Dissecting the Random Component of Utility" Marketing letters, 13(3):177-194
23. Mansky, C. (1977). The Structure of Random Utility Models, Theory and Decisión 8:229-254.
24. McFadden, D. (1974). "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour." In: P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press.
25. Pattanayak, S., and Mercer, D.E., (1998). Valuing Soil Conservation Benefits of Agroforestry: Contour Hedgerows in the Eastern Visayas, Philippines, Agricultural Economics 18:31-46.
26. Pastor, M., Castro, J., Saavedra, M., Humanes, M., Pajarón,M., Civantos, M., Alvarado, M. and Caballero J., (1999): Cultivo del olivar en zonas de especial protección ambiental, Información técnica, 65/99, Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca, Junta de Andalucia.
27. Ribaudo, M. O. (1986). Reducing Soil Erosion: Offsite Benefits. AER-561. ERS, USDA. Washington, DC.
28. Thornes, J., (1996): Desertification in the Mediterranean; In The Mediterranean: Desertification and Land Use, Brandt, Thornes J. Eds, Wiley, Chichester, England.
29. Train K (1998) "Recreation demand models with taste differences over people" Land Economics, 74(2):230-240.
30. UNEP (1992): United Nations Environmental Programs, Status of Desertification and Implementation of the United Nations Plan of Action to Combat Desertification UNEP7GCSS III/3. Nairobi, Kenya.