Using choice experiments to value the natura 2000 nature conservation programs in Finland

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 361-374

  Li, Chuan Zhong ^a   Kuuluvainen, Jari ^b   Pouta, Eija ^b   Rekola, Mika ^b   Tahvonen, Olli ^c  

^a DALARNA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

choice experiment; nature conservation; willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

NATURE CONSERVATION PROGRAM; VALUATION STUDY;

BINARY CODES; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS PRESERVATION; HOUSES; RESOURCE VALUATION; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

CONSERVATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; NATURE CONSERVATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

EID: 7744232647     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-004-9455-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams and J. Louviere (1998), 'Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80, 64-75.
2. Dubourg, W. R., M. W. Jones-Lee and L. Graham (1994), 'Imprecise Preferences and the WTP-WTA Disparity', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9, 115-133.
3. Hanemann, W. M. (1984), 'Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66, 332-341.
4. Hanemann, W. M. (1991), 'Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?', American Economic Review 81, 635-647.
5. Hanemann, W. M. (2003), 'Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Reply', American Economic Review 93, 464.
6. Hanley, N., R. E. Wright and W. Adamowicz (1998), 'Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment: Design Issues, Current Experience and Future Prospects', Environmental and Resource Economics 11(3-4), 413-428.
7. Hellström, E. (1999), 'Environmental Forestry Conflicts in Europe and the Unites States', in M. Palo and J. Unsivuori, eds., World Forests, Society and Environment. World Forests (Vol. 1 pp. 276-284). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Hilden, M., O. Tahvonen, L. Valsta, I. Niininen, E. Ostamo, J. Lepp and L. Herkiä (1998), Natura 2000 Verkoston Arviointi, Ministry of Environment, Helsinki.
9. Just R. E., D. L. Hueth and A. Schmitz (1982), Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
10. Knopp, T. and E. Caldbeck (1990), 'The Role of Participatory Democracy in Forest Management'. Journal of Forestry 88, 13-18.
11. Kriström, B. (1990), 'Valuing Environmental Benefits using the Contingent Valuation Method', Umeå Economic Studies 219, Umeå, Sweden.
12. Kriström, B. (1997), 'Spike Models in Contingent Valuation', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, 1013-1023.
13. Lancaster, K. (1966), 'A New Approach to Consumer Theory', Journal of Political Economy 74, 132-157.
14. Loikkanen, T. (1997), Osallistavan suunnittelun opas luonnonvara- ammattilaisille. [A participatory planning guide for natural resource managers.] Metsäahallitus, Finland [in Finnish].
15. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher and J. D. Swait (2000), Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. McFadden, D. (1974), 'Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior', in P. Zarembka, ed., Frontiers in Econometrics. NewYork: Academic Press.
17. Pouta, E., M. Rekola, J. Kuuluvainen, O. Tahvonen and C. Z. Li (2000), 'Contingent valuation of the Natura 2000 nature conservation programme in Finland', Forestry 73, 119-128.
18. Pouta, E., M. Rekola, J. Kuuluvainen, C. Z. Li and O. Tahvonen (2002), 'Willingness to Pay in Different Policy-Planning Methods: Insights into Respondents' Decision-Making Processes', Ecological Economics 40, 295-311.
19. Rekola, M., E. Pouta, J. Kuuluvainen, O. Tahvonen and C. Z. Li (2000), 'Incommensurable Preferences in Contingent Valuation: The Case of Natura 2000 Network in Finland'. Environmental Conservation 2, 260-268.
20. Shogren, J. -F., S. -Y. Shin, D. -J. Hayes and J. B. Kliebenstein (1994), 'Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept', American Economic Review 84, 255-270.
21. Thomas, J. C. (1993), 'Public Involvement and Governmental Effectiveness. A Decision-Making Model for Public Managers', Administration and Society 24, 444-469.